Applicant tracking systems for small business buyers
Asked as “applicant tracking system”, and as “ATS”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · 100Hires 20%
32Breezy HR20100Hires14Workable34others
32% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+5Since October 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Breezy HR held the lead, +5 points on 27%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Breezy HR32%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
Greenhouse30%Contested▼−10Since October 2026: 40% → 30%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseGreenhouse42%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 37% → 42%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Breezy HR32%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketGreenhouse30%Contested▼−10Since October 2026: 40% → 30%, −10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseGreenhouse42%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 37% → 42%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Breezy HR32%5%59endorsed leader▲+5Since October 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.27% → 32%
Breezy HR32%5%59endorsed leader▲+5Since October 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.27% → 32%02
100Hires20%0%31accepted challenger▲+18Since October 2026: 2% → 20%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.2% → 20%
100Hires20%0%31accepted challenger▲+18Since October 2026: 2% → 20%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.2% → 20%03
Workable14%8%53accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 16% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 14%
Workable14%8%53accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 16% → 14%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 14%04
Zoho Recruit14%2%42accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 22% → 14%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 14%
Zoho Recruit14%2%42accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 22% → 14%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 14%05
BambooHR5%9%32accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
BambooHR5%9%32accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%06
Manatal5%0%21accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
Manatal5%0%21accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%07
JazzHR4%10%50accepted challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 15% → 4%, −11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.15% → 4%
JazzHR4%10%50accepted challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 15% → 4%, −11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.15% → 4%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
Oracle Taleo0%100%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle Taleo0%100%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
iCIMS0%100%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
iCIMS0%100%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Workday Recruiting0%93%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday Recruiting0%93%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Lever0%72%18criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Lever0%72%18criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%13Greenhouse0%69%29criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Greenhouse0%69%29criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%09
Ashby0%25%12criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
Ashby0%25%12criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%08
Recruitee0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Recruitee0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Greenhouse vs Zoho RecruitGreenhouse vs LeverGreenhouse vs 100HiresGreenhouse vs ManatalWorkable vs Breezy HRWorkable vs AshbyWorkable vs Zoho RecruitWorkable vs LeverWorkable vs 100HiresWorkable vs ManatalBreezy HR vs AshbyBreezy HR vs Zoho RecruitBreezy HR vs LeverBreezy HR vs 100HiresBreezy HR vs ManatalAshby vs Zoho RecruitAshby vs LeverAshby vs 100HiresAshby vs ManatalZoho Recruit vs LeverZoho Recruit vs 100HiresZoho Recruit vs ManatalLever vs 100HiresLever vs Manatal100Hires vs Manatal
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Breezy HR32%
Breezy HR32%02100Hires20%
100Hires20%03Workable14%
Workable14%04Zoho Recruit14%
Zoho Recruit14%05BambooHR5%
BambooHR5%06Manatal5%
Manatal5%07JazzHR4%
JazzHR4%08Recruitee0%
Recruitee0%09Ashby0%
Ashby0%10Lever0%
Lever0%11iCIMS0%
iCIMS0%12Oracle Taleo0%
Oracle Taleo0%13Greenhouse0%
Greenhouse0%14Workday Recruiting0%
Workday Recruiting0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday Recruiting93%
13 of 14 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Built for large enterprises with complex global recruiting requirements. High cost, steep learning curve” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Greenhouse69%
20 of 29 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Overkill for small businesses due to its robust (but complicated) features, higher pricing, and steep learning curve.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Lever72%
13 of 18 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid for small B2B: Enterprise tools like Greenhouse, Lever, or iCIMS” Grok 4.20, paraphrase prompt
Oracle Taleo100%
10 of 10 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Small businesses should avoid enterprise pricing and complexity for SMB needs, as platforms like Taleo, ADP recruiting modules, and enterprise-tier ATS systems are built for large organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 754 links across 181 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
49 answers · 72 citations · 12 models
38 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Recruitee25 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · 100Hires21 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
21 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Zapier17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · JazzHR15 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group13 answers · 14 citations · 6 models
vendor site · CharlieHR11 answers · 11 citations · 6 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
44 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “applicant tracking system”, “applicant tracking systems”, “best applicant tracking system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breezy breezy.hr Breezy HR 32% | 32% | 226 | 3,600 | 59 | 178,670 company | $56 | 25 |
| 100Hires 100hires.com | 20% | 123 | 90 | 2 | 705 | 4 | |
| Workable workable.com | 14% | 332 | 14,800 | 520 | 698,499 | $14,562 | 77 |
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Recruit 14% | 14% | 312 | 2,900 | 46 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 |
| BambooHR bamboohr.com | 5% | 1074 | 90,500 | 551 | 1,055,247 | $44,698 | 106 |
| Manatal manatal.com | 5% | 305 | 2,400 | 267 | 73,150 | 120 | |
| JazzHR jazzhr.com | 4% | 141 | 14,800 | 70 | 11,754 | 19 | |
| Dover dover.com | 2% | 13 | |||||
| Join.com | 2% | ||||||
| Spark Hire sparkhire.com | 2% | 164 | 4,400 | 228 | 11,632 | $971 | 6 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (zapier.com). The first result for “applicant tracking system” is technologyadvice.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best applicant tracking system for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which ATS would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top applicant tracking systems for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best applicant tracking system for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an applicant tracking system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which applicant tracking systems should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Spark Hire, WorkableDoverChangedJazzHRBreezy HR, Zoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: ADP, Deel's ATS, JazzHR, Oracle Taleo, Recooty
Four alternatives
BambooHR, Breezy HR, Teamtailor, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Breezy HR, JazzHR, Manatal, WorkableFour alternatives
BambooHR, Breezy HR, Workable, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
JazzHR, ManatalGPT-5.4 miniWorkableBreezy HR, WorkableChangedBambooHR, JazzHRZoho Recruitno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
100Hires, ApplicantStack, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
JazzHR, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
Greenhouse, Lever, WorkableTwo alternatives
ApplicantStack, TalentHRGemini 3.5 FlashBreezy HRBreezy HRHeldBreezy HRagainst: Greenhouse, LeverBreezy HRBreezy HR, Workableagainst: Greenhouse, Lever, Workday Recruitingagainst: ADP, Jobvite, Oracle Taleo, PCRecruiter, Paychex, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Taleo Business Edition, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Five alternatives
BambooHR, JazzHR, Recruitee, Rippling, WorkableFive alternatives
BambooHR, Lever, Rippling, Workable, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
BambooHR, JazzHR, Workable, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
JazzHR, Manatal, Recooty, Zoho RecruitFive alternatives
Ashby, BambooHR, JazzHR, Recruitee, RipplingPerplexity Sonar100HiresJazzHRChangedBreezy HR, Workable, Zoho RecruitZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Ashby, Breezy HR, Greenhouse, JazzHR, Lever, Workable, Workday Recruiting, Zoho Recruit, iCIMS
Four alternatives
BambooHR, Breezy HR, Workable, Zoho RecruitFive alternatives
BambooHR, Breezy HR, Gusto, Workable, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
100Hires, BambooHR, JazzHR, ManatalTwo alternatives
100Hires, JazzHRGrok 4.20ManatalBambooHRChangedagainst: Greenhouse, Lever, iCIMSBreezy HRagainst: BambooHR, Oracle Taleo, Rippling, Workday RecruitingBreezy HRagainst: OpenCATSno first choiceagainst: Greenhouse, Lever, Oracle Taleo, iCIMSagainst: Ceipal, Greenhouse, JazzHR, Loxo, Oracle Taleo, Recruitee, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Three alternatives
Breezy HR, JazzHR, WorkableFour alternatives
100Hires, Manatal, Workable, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
JazzHR, Manatal, Workable, Zoho RecruitFive alternatives
Dover, Freshteam, Indeed's Built-in Tools, Workello, Zoho RecruitSix alternatives
Ashby, BambooHR, JazzHR, Manatal, RecruitCRM, WorkableMistral SmallWorkableWorkableHeldWorkableagainst: GreenhouseBreezy HR, Zoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Ashby, Greenhouse, Leveragainst: Bullhorn, GoHire, Indeed, LinkedIn, Loxo, Workday Recruiting
Three alternatives
100Hires, Breezy HR, DoverFour alternatives
100Hires, Breezy HR, JazzHR, Zoho RecruitSix alternatives
ApplicantPro, AvaHR, Breezy HR, JazzHR, Manatal, Monday.comTwo alternatives
100Hires, JazzHRSix alternatives
Breezy HR, Freshteam, JazzHR, Recruitee, Workable, Zoho RecruitDeepSeek V4 FlashBreezy HRZoho RecruitChanged100Hires, Breezy HR100Hires, Zoho Recruit100Hiresagainst: Greenhouse, Workableagainst: Ashby, Bullhorn, Greenhouse, JobDiva, Jobvite, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, iCIMS
Four alternatives
BambooHR, JazzHR, Manatal, WorkableTwo alternatives
BambooHR, JazzHRThree alternatives
BambooHR, JazzHR, WorkableTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, ManatalTwo alternatives
JazzHR, Zoho RecruitLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choice100Hiresno first choiceagainst: Workday Recruiting
Three alternatives
ApplicantStack, Breezy HR, Zoho RecruitQwen 3.7 FlashManatal100HiresChangedBreezy HR100Hires, Breezy HRJoin.comagainst: Greenhouse, Leveragainst: Greenhouse, Lever, Oracle Taleo, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Four alternatives
100Hires, Breezy HR, Gritty, Monday.comThree alternatives
Breezy HR, Workable, Zoho RecruitSix alternatives
100Hires, BambooHR, Betterteam, Recruitee, Rippling, WorkableTwo alternatives
JazzHR, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
BambooHR ATS, Recruitee, WorkableKimi K2100Hires, ManatalJazzHRChangedBreezy HR, JazzHRagainst: Greenhouse, LeverBreezy HRno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Breezy HR, Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Lever, Oracle Taleo, PeopleSoft, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting
Two alternatives
Breezy HR, WorkableThree alternatives
100Hires, Breezy HR, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
WorkableFive alternatives
100Hires, ApplicantStack, JazzHR, Manatal, Zoho RecruitGLM 4.7 FlashX100Hires, Breezy HR100HiresChangedRecruiteeagainst: JazzHRBreezy HR, Zoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Greenhouse, Lever, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Four alternatives
BambooHR, Greenhouse, JazzHR, WorkableThree alternatives
Breezy HR, JazzHR, WorkableSix alternatives
Ashby, AvaHR, BambooHR, Breezy HR, Manatal, WorkableTwo alternatives
100Hires, ApplicantStackMiniMax M2.5WorkableBreezy HRChangedBreezy HR100Hires, Breezy HRno first choiceagainst: Greenhouse, Lever, Workday Recruiting
Three alternatives
100Hires, Recruitment Management 365, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
BambooHR, Manatal, WorkableThree alternatives
JazzHR, Manatal, WorkableTwo alternatives
JazzHR, WorkableGPT-6 LunaWorkableBreezy HRChangedBreezy HRagainst: GreenhouseZoho Recruitagainst: Workableno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Breezy HR, Greenhouse, JazzHR, Oracle Recruiting, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, UKG Pro, Workable, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Three alternatives
Ashby, Breezy HR, JazzHRTwo alternatives
JazzHR, WorkableFour alternatives
Ashby, JazzHR, Workable, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
Breezy HRMuse Glimmer 30B100Hires, Breezy HRBambooHRChangedBreezy HRagainst: GreenhouseBreezy HRBambooHRagainst: Bullhorn, Cornerstone OnDemand, Greenhouse, Lever, Oracle Taleo, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS
Two alternatives
Workable, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
Breezy HR, JazzHR, WorkableFour alternatives
Ashby, JazzHR, Manatal, WorkableThree alternatives
100Hires, Manatal, Zoho RecruitThree alternatives
Breezy HR, JazzHR, WorkableBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:17 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 20 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 14 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:43 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 5 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 15 | 92 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 1 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:47 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 21 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 6 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:57 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:41 | yes | 14 | 49 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:18 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:18 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:20 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 5 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:59 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 19 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 10 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:45 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:51 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:04 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 12 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 5 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 24 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:58 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:19 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Breezy read as Breezy HR
Cornerstone read as Cornerstone OnDemand
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Taleo read as Oracle Taleo
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
Unresolved, counted raw
Chattr
Deel's ATS
Flowxtra
Gritty
Homebase Hiring
Homerunner / Fountain
Indeed's Built-in Tools
Jobtoolz
Join.com
Monday.com Recruit
OpenATS
Recruitment Management 365
Simple ATS
Taleo Business Edition (TBE)
Yardstick
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.