Workable vs Breezy HR
Four of fourteen models named Workable first on the direct prompt; two named Breezy HR. Workable was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Breezy HR by thirteen and Workable carries 42 labels and Breezy HR 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in fourteen categories this edition.
Named in ten categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the applicant tracking systems page.
By framing
WorkableFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBreezy HR
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Workable and Breezy HR were named in the same answer 140 times, of the 367 answers naming Workable and the 243 naming Breezy HR. In those answers Breezy HR took the first choice twenty-three times and Workable twenty-six.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Workable Breezy HR first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Workable on the left and Breezy HR on the right.The direct prompt
Both were the first choice
2 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Workable first, Breezy HR not the choice
2 of 14 modelsBreezy HR was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Breezy HR32%#1 of 14Workable14%#3 of 14Workable16%#2 of 17Breezy HR14%#3 of 17What the models said about Workable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“users report issues with the company's customer support, and its pricing model raises concerns about high costs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Avoid Workday Recruiting and SmartRecruiters unless you have enterprise-level needs” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“For a 500-person company, Workable or Recruitee often hit the sweet spot of capability, transparency, and adoption.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Workable – Highly rated for its ease of use, strong candidate tracking, and excellent job distribution features.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Breezy HR
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“If you hire only 1 role at a time and want to spend $0: Go with Breezy HR (for ease of use) or Zoho Recruit.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Breezy HR stands out as the best applicant tracking system (ATS) for a company with a limited budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Breezy HR's free plan or Indeed's free candidate management to test your hiring flow.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.