Index › HR › Talent acquisition › Applicant tracking syste › Zoho Recruit vs Lever
Applicant tracking systems · November 2026 Edition

Zoho Recruit vs Lever

Zero of fourteen models named Zoho Recruit first on the direct prompt; one named Lever. Zoho Recruit was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Lever by thirteen and Zoho Recruit carries 26 labels and Lever 50, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Zoho Recruit

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Lever

accepted challenger

Named in twelve categories this edition.

First-choice share9%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2650A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Zoho Recruit reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Greenhouse was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Greenhouse vs Zoho Recruit · Greenhouse vs Lever · Workable vs Zoho Recruit

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the applicant tracking systems page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Zoho RecruitFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLever
Direct011 against Lever
Paraphrase01
Comparative03
Budget-constrained501 against Lever
Scale-constrained01
Negative012 against Lever
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Zoho Recruit and Lever were named in the same answer forty-three times, of the 327 answers naming Zoho Recruit and the 264 naming Lever. In those answers Lever took the first choice five times and Zoho Recruit four.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Zoho Recruit and Lever stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Zoho Recruit Lever first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Zoho Recruit on the left and Lever on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Zoho Recruit and Lever stood in it.

Lever first, Zoho Recruit not the choice

1 of 14 modelsZoho Recruit was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Muse Glimmer 30BGreenhouse, Lever, Workable alternatives: Ashby, BambooHR

Neither was the first choice, one was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: BambooHR, Greenhouse, Jobvite, Lever, Workable
GPT-5.4 miniGreenhouse alternatives: Lever, Workable
Gemini 3.5 FlashAshby alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint
Perplexity SonarGreenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Lever, Pinpoint, Workable
Mistral SmallWorkable alternatives: Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, Zoho Recruit
DeepSeek V4 FlashAshby alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever
Qwen 3.7 FlashAshby, Greenhouse alternatives: Lever, SmartRecruiters
Kimi K2Greenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Lever
GPT-6 LunaAshby alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Grok 4.20Greenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Workable
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GLM 4.7 FlashXBreezy HR, Workable alternatives: Ashby, Crelate
MiniMax M2.5Breezy HR, Workable alternatives: Ashby, BambooHR, Greenhouse, JazzHR

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Zoho Recruit leads by fourteen points.
Zoho Recruit14%#4 of 14
Lever0%#10 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Zoho Recruit leads by four points.
Zoho Recruit9%#5 of 17
Lever5%#6 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Lever leads at enterprise.
Lever4%#5 of 10
Zoho Recruit0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Zoho Recruit

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Zoho is a top contender for tight budgets because it offers a robust Free plan for startups and small businesses” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Lever

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Avoid expensive enterprise systems like Greenhouse or Lever unless you have the scale” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Works adequately for tracking candidates (though some users find it lacking in reporting and sourcing)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Top Pick: Lever ... Choose Lever if you want the best balance of functionality, scalability, and modern features” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Lever / Greenhouse: The gold standard for scaling tech companies. Highly customizable, great analytics” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.