Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Talent acquisition › Applicant tracking syste › 100Hires vs Manatal
Applicant tracking systems · November 2026 Edition

100Hires vs Manatal

Zero of fourteen models named 100Hires first on the direct prompt; zero named Manatal. 100Hires was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Manatal by ten and 100Hires carries 17 labels and Manatal 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

100Hires

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Manatal

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels1714A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, 100Hires reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Greenhouse was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Greenhouse vs 100Hires · Greenhouse vs Manatal · Workable vs 100Hires

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the applicant tracking systems page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
100HiresFirst choices, of fourteen modelsManatal
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained22
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Manatal
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where 100Hires and Manatal stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
100Hires Manatal first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 100Hires on the left and Manatal on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where 100Hires and Manatal stood in it.

Neither was named

14 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: BambooHR, Greenhouse, Jobvite, Lever, Workable
GPT-5.4 miniGreenhouse alternatives: Lever, Workable
Gemini 3.5 FlashAshby alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint
Perplexity SonarGreenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Lever, Pinpoint, Workable
Grok 4.20Greenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Workable
Mistral SmallWorkable alternatives: Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, Zoho Recruit
DeepSeek V4 FlashAshby alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashAshby, Greenhouse alternatives: Lever, SmartRecruiters
Kimi K2Greenhouse alternatives: Ashby, Lever
GLM 4.7 FlashXBreezy HR, Workable alternatives: Ashby, Crelate
MiniMax M2.5Breezy HR, Workable alternatives: Ashby, BambooHR, Greenhouse, JazzHR
GPT-6 LunaAshby alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever
Muse Glimmer 30BGreenhouse, Lever, Workable alternatives: Ashby, BambooHR

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
100Hires leads by fourteen points.
100Hires20%#2 of 14
Manatal5%#6 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
100Hires4%#7 of 17
Manatal4%#8 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
100Hires0%#– of 10
Manatal0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about 100Hires

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“100Hires and Zoho Recruit are top choices due to their low cost and robust features” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“🏆 Top Recommendation: 100Hires” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Manatal

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“May feel cumbersome for managing large candidate pools.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best applicant tracking system for a company with a limited budget is Manatal, which is available at $15 per user a month” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Greenhouse vs 100HiresGreenhouse vs ManatalWorkable vs 100HiresWorkable vs ManatalBreezy HR vs 100HiresBreezy HR vs ManatalAshby vs 100HiresAshby vs ManatalZoho Recruit vs 100HiresZoho Recruit vs ManatalLever vs 100HiresLever vs ManatalAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full applicant tracking syste standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.