The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Calendly is first at 50%.
ModernLoop is first at 28%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
GoodTime is first at 55%.
“Cal.com is positioned as the best overall interview scheduling software for flexibility, customization, routing, and transparent pricing.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Cal.com – best overall free & open source ... 1 user, zero budget, want unlimited event types: Cal.com free.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“For most teams, start with Cal.com (balanced and flexible) or Calendly (if simplicity is key).”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“Cal.com – Best overall for flexibility, customization, routing and transparent pricing”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
“General-purpose schedulers such as Calendly, Cal.com, Koalendar, or YouCanBookMe: ... verify panel coordination, candidate routing, ATS write-back”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“Cal.com - Recent Concerns ... Production code went private; public repo became "Cal.diy"”MiniMax M2.5 · Negative question · warning
“less proven for pure recruiting at mid-market scale”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Cal.com, over the 95 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 83 | 21 | Compare → | |
| 53 | 14 | Compare → | |
| 45 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 30 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 27 | 0 | View → | |
| 25 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 1 | View → | |
| 16 | 2 | View → | |
| 16 | 1 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Cal.com →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 92 of the 95 answers that named Cal.com and are not a share of its labels.
205 of the 285 domain citations in answers naming Cal.com came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 650 | 95 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 40 | 33 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Report or ebook | 32 | 13 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 30 | 5 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Case study | 13 | 12 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 7 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 3 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| News or press | 2 | undated |
Every page cal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.