AI recruiting assistants for enterprise buyers
Asked as “AI recruiter”, and as “AI-powered candidate screening tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · HireVue 14%
25Eightfold AI14HireVue08Paradox53others
25% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▼−19Since October 2026: 44% → 25%, −19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Eightfold AI held the lead, −19 points on 44%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Manatal30%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 29% → 30%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Workable23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Workable (23%) replaces Manatal (31% then, 21% now), 2 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Eightfold AI25%Contested▼−19Since October 2026: 44% → 25%, −19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.This page
Manatal30%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 29% → 30%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketWorkable23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Workable (23%) replaces Manatal (31% then, 21% now), 2 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseEightfold AI25%Contested▼−19Since October 2026: 44% → 25%, −19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Eightfold AI25%13%52accepted challenger▼−19Since October 2026: 44% → 25%, −19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.44% → 25%
Eightfold AI25%13%52accepted challenger▼−19Since October 2026: 44% → 25%, −19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.44% → 25%02
HireVue14%24%45accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 7% → 14%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 14%
HireVue14%24%45accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 7% → 14%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 14%03
Paradox8%13%39accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%
Paradox8%13%39accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 8%04
SeekOut6%0%29accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
SeekOut6%0%29accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%05
iCIMS6%4%23accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
iCIMS6%4%23accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%06
Workday Recruiting4%33%24criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Workday Recruiting4%33%24criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%07
Phenom2%5%22accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Phenom2%5%22accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%08
HiredScore2%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
HiredScore2%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%09
Greenhouse2%21%28accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Greenhouse2%21%28accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%10
SmartRecruiters2%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
SmartRecruiters2%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
hireEZ0%6%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
hireEZ0%6%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Gem0%0%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Gem0%0%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12
Beamery0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Beamery0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Workable vs Zoho RecruitWorkable vs GemWorkable vs ParadoxManatal vs AshbyManatal vs GreenhouseManatal vs Zoho RecruitManatal vs GemManatal vs ParadoxAshby vs GreenhouseAshby vs Zoho RecruitAshby vs GemAshby vs ParadoxGreenhouse vs Zoho RecruitGreenhouse vs GemGreenhouse vs ParadoxZoho Recruit vs GemZoho Recruit vs ParadoxGem vs Paradox
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Eightfold AI25%
Eightfold AI25%02HireVue14%
HireVue14%03Paradox8%
Paradox8%04SeekOut6%
SeekOut6%05iCIMS6%
iCIMS6%06Workday Recruiting4%
Workday Recruiting4%07Phenom2%
Phenom2%08HiredScore2%
HiredScore2%09Greenhouse2%
Greenhouse2%10SmartRecruiters2%
SmartRecruiters2%11hireEZ0%
hireEZ0%12Beamery0%
Beamery0%13Gem0%
Gem0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
HireVue24%
11 of 45 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Frequently cited in complaints and lawsuits... Many experts recommend avoiding fully automated video scoring due to poor scientific validity” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Eightfold AI13%
7 of 52 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Sued for building "secret dossiers" on candidates without disclosure... Facing proposed class-action lawsuits” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Paradox13%
5 of 39 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Most top-tier AI recruiting tools (Paradox, Eightfold, Greenhouse) are not recommended for your specific constraint” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Greenhouse21%
6 of 28 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Most top-tier AI recruiting tools (Paradox, Eightfold, Greenhouse) are not recommended” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 923 links across 332 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Pin22 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · HeroHunt.ai21 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lever19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · BrightHire17 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sapia.ai16 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Phenom15 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SeekOut14 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Eightfold11 answers · 19 citations · 5 models
vendor site · G211 answers · 16 citations · 6 models
11 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Greenhouse11 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
19 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “ai recruiter”, “ai recruiting tools”, “best ai recruiter”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eightfold eightfold.ai Eightfold AI 25% | 25% | 520 | 4,400 | 187 | 53,360 company | 17 | |
| HireVue hirevue.com | 14% | 348 | 14,800 | 1,147 | 35,611 | 14 | |
| Paradox paradox.ai | 8% | 199 | 165,000 | 27,047 | 62,844 | 2 | |
| SeekOut seekout.com | 6% | 153 | 6,600 | 52 | 5,796 | 1 | |
| iCIMS icims.com | 6% | 143 | 27,100 | 667 | 1,165,712 | $5,674 | 26 |
| Workday parent site Workday Recruiting 4% | 4% | 184 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | |||
| Workable workable.com | 4% | 332 | 14,800 | 520 | 698,499 | $14,562 | 77 |
| candidate.fyi candidate.fyi | 4% | 70 | 210 | 0 | 494 | 10 | |
| Skima skima.ai Skima AI 4% | 4% | 11 | 140 | 0 | 47,834 | ||
| Pin pin.com | 4% | 104 | 368,000 | 243,385 | 24,375 | 28 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “ai recruiter” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best AI recruiter for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which AI-powered candidate screening tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade AI recruiting tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best AI recruiter for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Negative“Which AI recruiting tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PinHireVueChangedno first choiceGoPerfectagainst: Eightfold AI, HireVue, Paradox, iCIMSnothing named
Three alternatives
Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, iCIMSTwo alternatives
Eightfold AI, ParadoxOne alternative
ManatalGPT-5.4 miniEightfold AIHiredScoreChangedEightfold AIParadoxnothing named
Five alternatives
Bullhorn Amplify, Gem, HiredScore, Paradox, PhenomThree alternatives
Eightfold AI, Paradox, iCIMSSix alternatives
Greenhouse, Lever, Phenom, SeekOut, hireEZ, iCIMSTwo alternatives
Eightfold AI, HireVueGemini 3.5 FlashEightfold AIEightfold AIHeldEightfold AIParadoxagainst: Juicebox, Manatalagainst: HireVue
Four alternatives
Findem, Paradox, Phenom, SeekOutThree alternatives
HireVue, Paradox, Phenom Intelligent Talent ExperienceFive alternatives
Beamery, Findem, Paradox, Phenom, SeekOutTwo alternatives
Eightfold AI, hireEZPerplexity SonarGreenhouseagainst: Noon AI, Paradox, PinHireVueChangedno first choiceNoon AIagainst: Dover, Eightfold AI, LinkedIn Hiring Assistant, Workableagainst: hireEZ
Two alternatives
Eightfold AI, SeekOutThree alternatives
Eightfold AI, Paradox, Sapia.aiEleven alternatives
Eightfold AI, Gem, Greenhouse, HireVue, Paradox, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SeekOut, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, hireEZ, iCIMSOne alternative
ParadoxGrok 4.20Eightfold AIHireVueChangedagainst: RoundOne AI, TestGorillaEightfold AIWorkableagainst: Greenhouse, Lever, Pin, candidate.fyiagainst: Ashby, Greenhouse, HireVue, Lever, Pymetrics, Workday Recruiting
Two alternatives
HiredScore, SeekOutTwo alternatives
Eightfold AI, ParadoxNine alternatives
Beamery, HappyRobot, HireVue, HiredScore, Paradox, Phenom, Sapia.ai, Workday Recruiting, iCIMSFive alternatives
Eightfold AI, HireVue, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Recruiting, iCIMSMistral SmallEightfold AI, SeekOutHireVue, ParadoxChangedEightfold AIAlex AIagainst: HireVue
Three alternatives
Greenhouse, HireVue, PerfectThree alternatives
Greenhouse, HiredScore, SeekOutFive alternatives
HappyRobot, HireVue, HiredScore, Paradox, SeekOutTwo alternatives
Eightfold AI, HireVueDeepSeek V4 FlashEightfold AIHireVueChangedEightfold AIiCIMSagainst: Greenhouse, Paradox, Workday Recruitingagainst: Amazon, HireVue, LinkedIn, Pymetrics, Workday Recruiting, ZipRecruiter
Six alternatives
Betts Connect AI, Greenhouse, HiredScore, Noon AI, Phenom, SeekOutThree alternatives
Eightfold AI, HiredScore, SeekOutSix alternatives
HireVue, HiredScore, Paradox, Phenom, SeekOut, iCIMSOne alternative
Eightfold AILlama 4 MaverickHireVueBrightHire ScreenChangedno first choiceWorkday Recruitingnothing named
Four alternatives
Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, SeekOut, WorkableThree alternatives
Hirebee, SeekOut, TruffleTwo alternatives
Greenhouse, iCIMSQwen 3.7 FlashEightfold AI, Skima AIEightfold AIChangedEightfold AI, ParadoxiCIMSagainst: Amazon’s Discontinued Recruitment Engine, HireVue, Workday Recruiting
Two alternatives
SeekOut, hireEZTwo alternatives
HireVue, ParadoxSeven alternatives
Beamery, Fetcher, Greenhouse, Harver, HireVue, Mya Systems, SeekOutFour alternatives
Eightfold AI, HireVue, Paradox.ai, Workday RecruitingKimi K2Workday Recruiting, iCIMSEightfold AI, PhenomChangedEightfold AI, PhenomSmartRecruitersagainst: Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, HireVue, Lever, Paradox, Workday Recruitingagainst: HireVue, Pymetrics, Workday Recruiting
Seven alternatives
Eightfold AI, HireVue, LinkedIn Recruiter, Paradox, Phenom, SeekOut, hireEZTwo alternatives
HireVue, SmartRecruitersEight alternatives
Beamery, Gem, HireVue, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Paradox, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, iCIMSThree alternatives
RightMatch, Talenteria, candidate.fyiGLM 4.7 FlashXEightfold AIEightfold AIHeldEightfold AISeekOut, Workableagainst: Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, Paradoxagainst: Amazon’s Recruiting AI, Eightfold AI, HireVue
Four alternatives
Greenhouse, HiredScore, Workday Recruiting, iCIMSTwo alternatives
HireVue, ParadoxFive alternatives
Greenhouse, HireVue, Paradox, SeekOut, Workday RecruitingOne alternative
ManatalMiniMax M2.5Pin, Skima AIHireVue, ParadoxChangedEightfold AITalenteria, candidate.fyiagainst: Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, Phenomagainst: Amazon's screening tool, HireVue, Pymetrics
Five alternatives
Eightfold AI, GoodTime, HireVue, Workday Recruiting, iCIMSOne alternative
PymetricsSeven alternatives
Beamery, HireVue, Paradox, Phenom, SeekOut, hireEZ, iCIMSTwo alternatives
RecruiterHorizon.ai, RightMatchGPT-6 LunaSeekOutEightfold Talent AcquisitionChangedno first choicecandidate.fyiagainst: Eightfold AI, Workday Recruiting
Three alternatives
Eightfold AI, HiredScore, ParadoxTwo alternatives
HiredScore, Workday RecruitingTwelve alternatives
Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, HireVue, HiredScore, Oracle Fusion Cloud Recruiting, Paradox, Phenom, SAP SuccessFactors, SeekOut, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, iCIMSTwo alternatives
Ema, ParadoxMuse Glimmer 30BEightfold AIEightfold AIHeldEightfold AIHuntloagainst: HireVue, Workday – HiredScore
Nine alternatives
Gem, Greenhouse, Humanly, Lever, Paradox, SeekOut, Workday Recruiting, hireEZ, iCIMSThree alternatives
HireVue, Paradox, Sapia.aiSeven alternatives
Beamery, Greenhouse, HireVue, Paradox with Olivia, Phenom, Workday Recruiting, iCIMSTwo alternatives
HireAgent Enterprise, daily.dev RecruiterBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 8 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 15 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:24 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:09 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 15 | 63 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 3 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 24 | 207 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 15 | 47 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 9 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 10 | 65 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 21 | 81 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 22 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 36 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:09 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 9 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:39 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:46 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 10 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 8 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 3 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:07 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 14 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 10 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 13 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 6 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Eightfold read as Eightfold AI
HiredScore AI for Recruiting read as HiredScore
Noon read as Noon AI
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
iCIMS Talent Cloud read as iCIMS
Unresolved, counted raw
Alex AI
Amazon's screening tool
Amazon’s Discontinued Recruitment Engine
Betts Connect AI
BrightHire Screen
Bullhorn Amplify
Eightfold Talent Acquisition
Ema
HireAgent Enterprise
JazzHR Hero
Oracle Fusion Cloud Recruiting
Paradox with Olivia
Paradox.ai
Perfect
Phenom Intelligent Talent Experience
RecruiterHorizon.ai
SelectPrism
Talent360‑IntelliHire
Workday – HiredScore
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.