Candidate assessment
Asked as “pre-employment assessment platform”, and as “skills testing tool for hiring”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
51%
Clear leader
51TestGorilla12Criteria Corp06Toggl Hire31others
51% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−1Since October 2026: 52% → 51%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.TestGorilla held the lead, −1 point on 52%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
TestGorilla68%Clear leader▼−8Since October 2026: 76% → 68%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketTestGorilla51%Clear leader▼−1Since October 2026: 52% → 51%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
SHL41%Clear leader▲+21Since October 2026: 20% → 41%, +21 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →
TestGorilla68%Clear leader▼−8Since October 2026: 76% → 68%, −8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketTestGorilla51%Clear leader▼−1Since October 2026: 52% → 51%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseSHL41%Clear leader▲+21Since October 2026: 20% → 41%, +21 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01TestGorilla51%5%56endorsed leader▼−1Since October 2026: 52% → 51%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.52% → 51%
TestGorilla51%5%56endorsed leader▼−1Since October 2026: 52% → 51%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.52% → 51%02
Criteria Corp12%6%36accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.19% → 12%
Criteria Corp12%6%36accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.19% → 12%03
Codility4%9%34accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Codility4%9%34accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%04
EmployTest4%0%15accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
EmployTest4%0%15accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%05
HackerRank2%7%41accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
HackerRank2%7%41accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%06
CodeSignal2%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
CodeSignal2%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%07
Harver2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Harver2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
HireVue0%25%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
HireVue0%25%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10SHL0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SHL0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
The Predictive Index0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The Predictive Index0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Vervoe0%0%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Vervoe0%0%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Mercer | Mettl0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Mercer | Mettl0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
TestGorilla vs HackerRankTestGorilla vs CodeSignalTestGorilla vs HarverCriteria Corp vs CodilityCriteria Corp vs EmployTestCriteria Corp vs HackerRankCriteria Corp vs CodeSignalCriteria Corp vs HarverCodility vs EmployTestCodility vs HackerRankCodility vs CodeSignalCodility vs HarverEmployTest vs HackerRankEmployTest vs CodeSignalEmployTest vs HarverHackerRank vs CodeSignalHackerRank vs HarverCodeSignal vs Harver
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01TestGorilla51%
TestGorilla51%02Criteria Corp12%
Criteria Corp12%03Codility4%
Codility4%04EmployTest4%
EmployTest4%05HackerRank2%
HackerRank2%06CodeSignal2%
CodeSignal2%07Harver2%
Harver2%08Vervoe0%
Vervoe0%09Mercer | Mettl0%
Mercer | Mettl0%10SHL0%
SHL0%11The Predictive Index0%
The Predictive Index0%12HireVue0%
HireVue0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Proctorio100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Aggressive monitoring (eye tracking, mouse movement, gaze detection), algorithmic bias against students with darker skin tones, invasive browser lockdown” Kimi K2, negative prompt
ProctorU80%
4 of 5 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“alleging these companies engaged in unfair and deceptive practices” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
HireVue25%
5 of 20 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“What to avoid on a tight budget ... HireVue is built for enterprise-scale AI video interviewing and starts at ~$35,000/yr with no free tier.” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
Honorlock43%
3 of 7 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Similar invasive monitoring concerns, network traffic analysis, privacy complaints” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
69 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 822 links across 241 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 5 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · TestGorilla28 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group27 answers · 42 citations · 9 models
25 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
24 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Criteria Corp18 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G217 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
vendor site · FirstHR14 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Rework14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · EmployTest12 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
22 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “assessment platforms”, “best pre-employment assessment platform”, “pre-employment assessment platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TestGorilla testgorilla.com | 51% | 254 | 4,400 | 170 | 58,548 | $462 | 76 | |
| Criteria criteriacorp.com Criteria Corp 12% | 12% | 102 | 2,400 | 39 | 103,671 company | $6,427 | 63 | 3 |
| Toggl toggl.com Toggl Hire 6% | 6% | 19 | 70 | 1 | 257,259 company | 30 | ||
| Codility codility.com | 4% | 235 | 3,600 | 114 | 3,042 | $108 | 3 | |
| EmployTest employtest.com | 4% | 33 | 170 | 0 | 4,422 | 3 | ||
| Test Partnership testpartnership.com | 4% | 4 | ||||||
| HackerRank hackerrank.com | 2% | 278 | 33,100 | 1,116 | 58,699 | 22 | ||
| CodeSignal codesignal.com | 2% | 179 | 14,800 | 548 | 152,420 | $5,323 | 23 | |
| Harver harver.com | 2% | 51 | 1,300 | 136 | 8,635 | $1,218 | 6 | |
| TestDome testdome.com | 2% | 53 | 880 | 22 | 34,709 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (criteriacorp.com). The first result for “assessment platforms” is testportal.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best pre-employment assessment platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which skills testing tool for hiring would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top assessment platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best pre-employment assessment platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a pre-employment assessment platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which assessment platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Criteria Corp, Harver, PlumBryqChangedno first choiceTestGorillano first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
JobCannon, SHL, TestGorilla, Vervoe, WonderlicTwo alternatives
Criteria Corp, TestGorillaOne alternative
Toggl HireGPT-5.4 miniCriteria CorpTestGorillaChangedCodility, HackerRankCanditech, TestDomeno first choiceagainst: Canvas, Canvas LMS, ETS, PowerSchool
Four alternatives
HighMatch, TestGorilla, Testlify, The Predictive IndexFive alternatives
Coderbyte, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, Qualified, VervoeSeven alternatives
Cornerstone, Criteria Corp, Docebo, HireVue, LearnUpon, SHL, TalentLMSGemini 3.5 FlashTestGorillaagainst: Korn Ferry, SHLTestGorillaHeldagainst: Codility, HackerRankno first choiceTestGorillaagainst: CodeSignal, HackerRankno first choiceagainst: Honorlock, Proctorio, Respondus Monitor
Three alternatives
Criteria Corp, The Predictive Index, VervoeThree alternatives
Coderbyte, Vervoe, iMochaEight alternatives
Adaface, Coderbyte, EmployTest, Google Forms, Loom, TestDome, Toggl Hire, TypeformPerplexity SonarCriteria Corpagainst: The Predictive IndexTestGorillaChangedno first choiceTestGorillano first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Codility, TestGorilla, VervoeSeven alternatives
Bryq, CodeSignal, Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, SHL, VervoeEleven alternatives
Canvas, CodeSignal, ExamSoft, Formative, Google Forms, HackerRank, Kahoot!, Mercer | Mettl, Questionmark, TestGorilla, TypeformThree alternatives
Bryq, EmployTest, TestDomeGrok 4.20Criteria Corpagainst: HireVueTestGorillaChangedagainst: HireVueno first choiceToggl Hireno first choiceagainst: Aon, Criteria Corp, Harver, HireVue, Paradox, SHL, Wonderlic
Three alternatives
Harver, TestGorilla, Thomas InternationalFive alternatives
Adaface, Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, Test PartnershipThree alternatives
EmployTest, TestGorilla, TestlifyMistral SmallCodility, HackerRankCodeSignal, Test PartnershipChangedno first choiceEmployTest, Toggl Hireno first choiceagainst: Codility, HackerRank, RiskLens, SAFE Security, TestGorilla
Two alternatives
TestGorilla, Thomas InternationalThree alternatives
Codility, HackerRank, VervoeOne alternative
TestGorillaDeepSeek V4 FlashTestGorillaTestGorillaHeldTestGorillaTestGorillano first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Canditech, Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRankFour alternatives
Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, VervoeEleven alternatives
Canditech, CodeSignal, Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, HireVue, Mercer | Mettl, SHL, Synap, The Predictive Index, VervoeThree alternatives
Criteria Corp, EmployTest, Toggl HireFour alternatives
Criteria Corp, Harver, HireVue, TestGorillaLlama 4 MaverickThomas Internationalno first choiceChangedno first choiceTestGorillano first choiceagainst: RiskLens, TestGorilla, Xobin
Four alternatives
Codility, EmployTest, HackerRank, WeirdlyTwo alternatives
EmployTest, TestDomeQwen 3.7 FlashTestGorillaagainst: PymetricsTestGorillaHeldCodility, HackerRankTestGorillano first choiceagainst: CoderPad, Codility, Criteria Corp, HireVue, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Workday
Four alternatives
HackerRank, PI Online, Spark Hire, VervoeThree alternatives
HackerRank, PLUM.io, VervoeFive alternatives
CodeSignal, Harver, Mercer | Mettl, TestGorilla, VervoeThree alternatives
CoderPad, Ducknowl, TestDomeKimi K2TestGorillaTestGorillaHeldno first choiceEmployTest, TestGorillaagainst: Toggl Hireno first choiceagainst: Aon Consulting, ExamSoft, Honorlock, ProctorU, Proctorio, Workday
Five alternatives
Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, HireVue, VervoeTwo alternatives
Codility, Criteria CorpEleven alternatives
Cloud Assess, CodeSignal, Codility, Criteria Corp, ExamBuilder, HackerRank, Honorlock, Mercer | Mettl, SHL, Synap, TestGorillaTwo alternatives
HackerRank, TestlifyGLM 4.7 FlashXTestGorillaTestGorillaHeldno first choiceTestGorillano first choiceagainst: BetterMe's "Childhood Trauma Test", Canvas LMS, Clickworker.com, Crowdgen.com, Examity, Google Forms, Honorlock, Moodle, Pearson's AIMSweb, ProctorU, Proctorio, Respondus
Three alternatives
Criteria Corp, HireVue, Thomas InternationalFive alternatives
Adaface, Codility, Criteria Corp, HireVue, Test PartnershipThree alternatives
EmployTest, Hire Success® Employment Testing System, TestlifyMiniMax M2.5Prevue HR, TestGorillaTestGorillaChangedno first choiceToggl Hireagainst: TestGorillano first choiceagainst: ExamSoft, ProctorU, Proctorio, Respondus LockDown Browser
Four alternatives
Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, HireVueFour alternatives
Codility, Criteria Corp, HackerRank, Skills BaseOne alternative
EmployTestGPT-6 LunaCriteria CorpTestGorillaChangedno first choiceTestGorillano first choicenothing named
One alternative
TestGorillaTwo alternatives
Criteria Corp, VervoeTwo alternatives
EmployTest, HackerRankMuse Glimmer 30BCodility, ThomasCriteria Corp, Test PartnershipChangedCodilityTestGorillaagainst: HireVueno first choiceagainst: Examity, Examplify, Knockri, ProctorExam, ProctorTrack, ProctorU, Proctorio, Respondus Monitor / Respondus
Three alternatives
HackerRank, HireVue, WeirdlyFour alternatives
Codility, HackerRank, TestGorilla, VervoeFour alternatives
CodeSignal, HackerRank, Mercer | Mettl, TestGorillaThree alternatives
Assessing AI, EmployTest, TestTrickBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 14 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:02 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 12 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 3 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 11 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:57 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 25 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:07 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 19 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:37 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 21 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 20 | 51 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 20 | 115 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:53 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 1 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 8 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 21 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 17 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 19 | 185 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 15 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:18 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:42 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:28 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 8 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:40 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:58 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 21 | 63 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 14 | 71 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:49 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:54 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:47 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:29 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 25 | 113 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:36 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Criteria read as Criteria Corp
Criteria (Criteria Corp) read as Criteria Corp
Criteria (HireSelect) read as Criteria Corp
Criteria (by Criteria Corp) read as Criteria Corp
Unresolved, counted raw
Alkymetrics
Alps
Aon Consulting
Assessing AI
BetterMe's "Childhood Trauma Test"
Clickworker.com
Crowdgen.com
Culture Index
Edcafe AI
Edulastic
Examarius
Examplify
Fieldguide
Gradescope (by Turnitin)
HighMatch
Hire Success® Employment Testing System
Kahoot
Knockri
Maki People
Moodle with plugins
OnlineExamMaker
Otus
PI Online (Performance Innovations)
PLUM.io
Pear Assessment
Pearson's AIMSweb
Respondus Monitor
Respondus Monitor / Respondus
Socrative
Testmoz
Think Exam
Thomas
ThriveMap
Trivie
Wayground
Wizer
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.