CodeSignal is a skills intelligence and validation platform for technical hiring and learning · codesignal.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Coderbyte is first at 36%.
HackerRank is first at 23%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
HackerRank is first at 38%.
“Offers a free plan and is highly ranked for technical hiring... This is a strong choice if you need a robust, all-in-one solution without immediate cost.”Mistral Small · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Highly ranked for its broad assessment suite, analytics, proctoring, and integrations, making it a strong all-around choice”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“Choose CodeSignal for standardized assessments, certification, structured scoring, or high-volume early-career hiring.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · first choice
“A good platform (like Codility or CodeSignal) documents transparent scoring, offers a clean IDE”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · first choice
“Users have reported numerous bugs, system refreshes that lost their code, and random language switches during assessments”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
“Frequent candidate complaints about glitches in the editor... Trustpilot averages around 3/5, with reports of lost work during timed tests.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“CodeSignal assessments requiring proctoring: Be aware that a proctored assessment may record your camera, microphone, and screen”GPT-6 Luna · Negative question · warning
“While these are industry standards, they carry specific complaints regarding *usability* and *relevance* rather than malice.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as CodeSignal, over the 194 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 173 | 31 | Compare → | |
| 145 | 28 | Compare → | |
| 98 | 15 | Compare → | |
| 95 | 23 | Compare → | |
| 72 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 2 | View → | |
| 36 | 0 | View → | |
| 27 | 5 | View → | |
| 27 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 25 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of CodeSignal →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on CodeSignal's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 179 of the 194 answers that named CodeSignal and are not a share of its labels.
482 of the 535 domain citations in answers naming CodeSignal came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 11,915 | undated | Technical hiring assessm, Performance management | ||
| Blog | 422 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | Candidate assessment, Video interviewing | |
| News or press | 50 | 3 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Comparison | 37 | 4 | 2026-08-26 | Candidate assessment | |
| Case study | 31 | 0 | 2026-05-09 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 23 | 1 | 2026-09-19 | ||
| Template or tool | 10 | 0 | 2025-03-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 0 | 2025-07-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-25 |
As the event pages on codesignal.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page codesignal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.