4 categories · RankedCodility
Codility is an online coding test and interview platform for assessing technical talent through skill-based assessments and interviews · codility.com ↗
Strongest at mid-market. Ranked 7 of 80 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Coderbyte is first at 36%.
HackerRank is first at 23%. 7 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
HackerRank is first at 38%.
Why models recommend it
“Codility | Defensible hiring decisions; agentic AI coding | ~$1,200/yr (120 credits) | Strongest proctoring, VS Code env, Claude Code integration”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Choose Codility if you need defensible, custom work-sample assessments, strong compliance/auditability and explicit coding-agent support.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Codility offers the best balance of assessment quality, pricing, and defensibility.”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“positioned as best for repeatable, defensible technical hiring decisions... Codility scored highest on published criteria”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Why Avoid the Giants? (HackerRank & Codility) ... often poor choices for *strictly* limited budgets”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“these are often viewed unfavorably compared to competitors like HackerRank or HackerEarth”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“While these are industry standards, they carry specific complaints regarding *usability* and *relevance* rather than malice.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“significantly cheaper than enterprise-focused platforms like HackerRank or Codility (which start around $1,200+/year)”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Codility, over the 251 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 222 | 32 | Compare → | |
| 145 | 14 | Compare → | |
| 139 | 31 | Compare → | |
| 94 | 25 | Compare → | |
| 67 | 8 | Compare → | |
| 53 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 44 | 5 | View → | |
| 39 | 1 | View → | |
| 37 | 1 | View → | |
| 32 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Codility →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Codility's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- enterprises
- Price stated
- Starter Annual billing only $1200; Scale Monthly Yearly – Save 17% $6000 $6000; Custom Bespoke requirements Let’s talk
- Starting price
- 1200
- Free plan or trial
- Request a free trial
- Integrations
- 5
- Certifications
- ISO 27001, CCPA, GDPR, WCAG 2.2 AA, SOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- EU, US, EU and US data hosting on AWS
- Customers named
- GitHub, SpaceX, Tesla, EY, LSEG, SAP, Barclays, Citi
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 235 of the 251 answers that named Codility and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
554 of the 692 domain citations in answers naming Codility came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 141 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | Skills intelligence | |
| Report or ebook | 23 | 0 | 2025-10-02 | Candidate assessment | |
| Case study | 17 | 0 | 2022-10-19 | ||
| Conference or event | 17 | 0 | 2023-11-16 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 10 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-21 | Skills intelligence | |
| Template or tool | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Codility alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-23Codility vs leetcode comparison
- 2026-09-23Codility vs blueoptima comparison
- 2026-08-06Eu ai act hiring checklist template or tool
- 2026-08-03Codility vs codesignal comparison
- 2026-08-03Codility vs coderpad comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page codility.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.