TestGorilla is a talent sourcing and skills assessment platform for talent professionals · testgorilla.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Ranked first. Next is Canditech at 14%.
Ranked first. Next is Criteria Corp at 12%. 6 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
SHL is first at 41%.
“TestGorilla is designed for both technical and non-technical hiring... specifically aimed at providing an affordable solution for small- and medium-sized enterprises”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · first choice
“For most companies with a limited budget, TestGorilla offers the best combination of free tier, affordability, and assessment variety.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Strong for skills, cognitive, and personality tests; good anti-cheating and integrations. Pros: Large library, affordable.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · first choice
“Start with TestGorilla for its balance of features, pricing transparency, and ease of implementation”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · first choice
“Why to Be Cautious: While popular for its variety of assessments, users often complain about the ratio of "fluff" to actual coding questions.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Better suited to teams consolidating general hiring assessments than to teams needing a deep software-engineering workbench.”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · warning
“TestGorilla is favored by small businesses, indicating a potential mismatch for larger companies”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · warning
“Some AI models flag it for issues such as poor technical support and limited budget flexibility”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as TestGorilla, over the 277 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 169 | 19 | Compare → | |
| 139 | 24 | Compare → | |
| 98 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 83 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 78 | 24 | Compare → | |
| 67 | 2 | View → | |
| 51 | 5 | View → | |
| 50 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 43 | 1 | View → | |
| 39 | 2 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of TestGorilla →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on TestGorilla's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 254 of the 277 answers that named TestGorilla and are not a share of its labels.
602 of the 677 domain citations in answers naming TestGorilla came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 |