Succession planning
Asked as “succession planning software”, and as “talent review tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
30%
Contested · PerformYard 13%
30Lattice13PerformYard09SuccessionNow47others
30% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+2Since October 2026: 28% → 30%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Lattice held the lead, +2 points on 28%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PerformYard29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: PerformYard (29%) replaces BambooHR (18% then, 4% now), 25 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Lattice30%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 28% → 30%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Workday Succession Planning34%Contested▼−5Since October 2026: 39% → 34%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
PerformYard29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: PerformYard (29%) replaces BambooHR (18% then, 4% now), 25 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketLattice30%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 28% → 30%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseWorkday Succession Planning34%Contested▼−5Since October 2026: 39% → 34%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Lattice30%3%32endorsed leader▲+2Since October 2026: 28% → 30%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.28% → 30%
Lattice30%3%32endorsed leader▲+2Since October 2026: 28% → 30%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.28% → 30%02PerformYard13%0%39accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 4% → 13%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 13%
PerformYard13%0%39accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 4% → 13%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 13%03
SuccessionNow9%4%26accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 11% → 9%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 9%
SuccessionNow9%4%26accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 11% → 9%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 9%04
Teamflect9%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%
Teamflect9%0%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%05
TalentGuard Succession Planning4%0%18accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
TalentGuard Succession Planning4%0%18accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%06
ChartHop2%0%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
ChartHop2%0%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development0%47%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development0%47%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09Workday Succession Planning0%30%23criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Workday Succession Planning0%30%23criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08
Cornerstone Succession0%26%27criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Cornerstone Succession0%26%27criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
UKG Pro Succession Planning0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
UKG Pro Succession Planning0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
15Five0%0%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
15Five0%0%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Lattice vs TalentGuard Succession PlanningLattice vs ChartHopPerformYard vs SuccessionNowPerformYard vs TeamflectPerformYard vs TalentGuard Succession PlanningPerformYard vs ChartHopSuccessionNow vs TeamflectSuccessionNow vs TalentGuard Succession PlanningSuccessionNow vs ChartHopTeamflect vs TalentGuard Succession PlanningTeamflect vs ChartHopTalentGuard Succession Planning vs ChartHop
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Lattice30%
Lattice30%02PerformYard13%
PerformYard13%03SuccessionNow9%
SuccessionNow9%04Teamflect9%
Teamflect9%05TalentGuard Succession Planning4%
TalentGuard Succession Planning4%06ChartHop2%
ChartHop2%0715Five0%
15Five0%08Cornerstone Succession0%
Cornerstone Succession0%09Workday Succession Planning0%
Workday Succession Planning0%10Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM0%11UKG Pro Succession Planning0%
UKG Pro Succession Planning0%12SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development0%
SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development47%
14 of 30 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Dedicated enterprise software (like SAP SuccessFactors) is too expensive for this scenario.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Cornerstone Succession26%
7 of 27 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Platforms like SAP SuccessFactors, Cornerstone, or PageUp are powerful but can be overkill for mid-sized companies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Workday Succession Planning30%
7 of 23 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Unlike large enterprises that need massive suites like Workday or SAP, mid-market B2B companies thrive on tools that integrate into daily workflows” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Excel
75%
3 of 4 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid relying on spreadsheets as your primary succession repository if you are managing complex or growing leadership tiers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 792 links across 198 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
35 answers · 56 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Disprz27 answers · 28 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · FirstHR22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G220 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
vendor site · BullseyeEngagement17 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
vendor site · SkillPanel16 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Peoplebox15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group13 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Engagedly13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 12 models
23 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best succession planning software”, “succession planning software”, “succession planning tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice lattice.com | 30% | 625 | 90,500 | 13,900 | 122,123 | $1,328 | 120 | |
| PerformYard performyard.com | 13% | 217 | 9,900 | 34 | 58,643 | $25 | 47 | |
| SuccessionNow successionnow.com | 9% | 73 | 0 | 20 | 0 | |||
| Teamflect teamflect.com | 9% | 136 | 880 | 12 | 12,592 | 30 | ||
| Creately creately.com | 6% | 67 | 2,400 | 797,895 | 383,446 | 3 | ||
| Disprz disprz.ai | 6% | 66 | ||||||
| TalentGuard Succession Planning talentguard.com | 4% | 41 | 0 | 27,310 | 3 | |||
| Peoplebox peoplebox.ai | 4% | 31 | 210 | 6 | 15,519 | 0 | ||
| SuccessionStack successionstack.com | 4% | 11 | 10 | 0 | 2 | |||
| ChartHop charthop.com | 2% | 380 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 17 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best succession planning software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best succession planning software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which talent review tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top succession planning tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best succession planning software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a succession planning software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which succession planning tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Engagedlyno first choiceChangedagainst: Workday Succession Planningno first choicePerformYardno first choiceagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
Three alternatives
Cornerstone Succession, Lattice, PeopleboxFour alternatives
ChartHop, ELMO Software, Lattice, PeopleboxGPT-5.4 miniLatticeLatticeHeldno first choiceagainst: Quantum Workplacetalyzrno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cornerstone Succession, PerformYardFour alternatives
BambooHR, HiBob, PerformYard, PersonioOne alternative
BambooHRGemini 3.5 FlashLattice, Leapsomeagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession PlanningLatticeChangedagainst: SAP, Workday Succession Planningno first choiceChartHop, PerformYard, Teamflectagainst: Cornerstone Succession, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Developmentno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Developmentagainst: Excel, Google Sheets
Four alternatives
HiBob, SuccessionHR, TalentGuard Succession Planning, TeamflectFive alternatives
Culture Amp, HiBob, Leapsome, PerformYard, RipplingEight alternatives
ChartHop, Cornerstone Succession, Lattice, Plum, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, TalentGuard Succession Planning, Teamflect, Workday Succession PlanningFive alternatives
Airtable, Empxtrack, Google Sheets / Excel, Lucidchart, monday work managementNine alternatives
Agentive, ChartHop, ClearCompany, HiBob, Lattice, Performio, Quantum Workplace, Rippling, SeraPointPerplexity SonarPeopleboxagainst: Cornerstone SuccessionLatticeChangedSAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession PlanningPeopleboxagainst: Latticeno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Dayforce, Engagedly, Lattice, TalentGuard Succession PlanningFive alternatives
15Five, Betterworks, HiBob, Paylocity, PerformYardNine alternatives
ChartHop, Cornerstone Succession, Eightfold AI, Lattice, Leapsome, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, PeopleFluent Succession Management, Peoplebox, TalentGuard Succession PlanningThree alternatives
ChartHop, Creately, PerformYardGrok 4.20PerformYardagainst: Accendo, Cornerstone Succession, PageUp, PeopleFluent Succession Management, SUCCESSIONappLatticeChangedagainst: Dayforce, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession PlanningLattice, SuccessionNowTeamflectagainst: SuccessionNowno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ClayHR, Disprz, SuccessionNow, TalentGuard Succession PlanningFour alternatives
15Five, HiBob, Leapsome, PerformYardSix alternatives
ChartHop, Cornerstone Succession, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, UKG Pro Succession Planning, Workday Succession PlanningTwo alternatives
Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel templates, PerformYardMistral SmallSuccessionNow, SuccessionStackLatticeChangedSAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession PlanningFactorial, PerformYardno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
Two alternatives
Disprz, TalentGuard Succession PlanningFive alternatives
ChartHop, Cornerstone Succession, PerformYard, Qandle, UKG Pro Succession PlanningTwo alternatives
Maus, SuccessionNowDeepSeek V4 FlashTalentGuard Succession Planningagainst: Cornerstone SuccessionLatticeChangedSuccessionStack, TalentGuard Succession Planningagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM Talent Management, UKG Pro Succession PlanningTeamflectagainst: Cornerstone Succession, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Developmentno first choiceagainst: Cornerstone Succession, Excel, PageUp, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Smartsheet
Three alternatives
Disprz, Neobrain, UKG Pro Succession PlanningTwo alternatives
15Five, LeapsomeSix alternatives
Cornerstone Succession, PerformYard, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, SUCCESSIONapp, SuccessionNow, Workday Succession PlanningThree alternatives
Creately, Nakisa Workforce Planning, SuccessionNowSix alternatives
Lattice, Paycom, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, SuccessionHR, Workday Succession Planning, WorkzoomLlama 4 MaverickDisprz, Neobrain, TalentGuard Succession Planningno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashDisprzagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Succession & DevelopmentLatticeChangedagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planningno first choiceagainst: Cornerstone SuccessionSuccessionNow, Zoho Peopleagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Developmentno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Neobrain, PerformYard, TalentGuard Succession PlanningTwo alternatives
15Five, PeopleboxFour alternatives
Bullseye Succession Planning, Excel, Nakisa Workforce Planning, PaycomKimi K2PerformYard, SuccessionNowLatticeChangedno first choiceTeamflectLattice, PerformYardagainst: Dayforce, Nakisa Workforce Planning
Three alternatives
Paycom, Teamflect, UKG ReadyTwo alternatives
15Five, LeapsomeThree alternatives
Creately, PerformYard, SuccessionNowFour alternatives
ChartHop, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP, Workday Succession PlanningGLM 4.7 FlashXDisprzLatticeChangedPerformYard, SuccessionHR, SuccessionNowCreately, SuccessionHR, SuccessionNowno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Lattice, Neobrain, PerformYard, SuccessionNow, TalentGuard Succession PlanningThree alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, PerformYardFive alternatives
Cornerstone Succession, Mitratech Perform, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession PlanningSix alternatives
CharlieHR – Free Succession Planning Template, Lattice, PerformYard, Sigma Assessment Systems – Free Template Library, Smartsheet – Free Succession Planning Templates, Which Framework – Free Succession Planning ToolMiniMax M2.5PerformYard, SuccessionNowagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession PlanningLatticeChangedagainst: Workday Succession Planningno first choiceCreatelyno first choiceagainst: Excel, Google Sheets, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
Two alternatives
ChartHop, Eightfold AITwo alternatives
BambooHR, Quantum WorkplaceThree alternatives
Excel/Google Sheets templates, PerformYard, SuccessionNowGPT-6 LunaLatticeLatticeHeldno first choiceTeamflectno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Engagedly, Your existing HCM's succession moduleOne alternative
15FiveSix alternatives
Cornerstone Succession, Dayforce Succession Planning, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Career and Talent Development, SuccessionHR, Workday Succession PlanningOne alternative
CreatelyMuse Glimmer 30BSuccessionStackLatticeChangedno first choiceCreatelyno first choiceagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Trakstar, isolved
Two alternatives
PerformYard, SuccessionNowTwo alternatives
15Five, PerformYardEight alternatives
Cegid Talentsoft, Cornerstone Galaxy, Cornerstone Succession, Gloat, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, TalentGuard Succession Planning, Workday Succession PlanningThree alternatives
Eightfold AI, SuccessionNow, TeamflectBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 7 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 22 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:46 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 7 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:38 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 19 | 38 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 13 | 116 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 6 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 6 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 17 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 12 | 53 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:29 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:27 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:26 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:38 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:21 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 19 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:39 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 14 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 22 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:32 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 20 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 24 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 14 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Cornerstone read as Cornerstone Succession
Cornerstone OnDemand read as Cornerstone Succession
Deel read as Deel HR
Monday.com read as monday work management
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Succession Planning read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
PeopleFluent read as PeopleFluent Succession Management
Peoplebox.ai read as Peoplebox
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
TalentGuard read as TalentGuard Succession Planning
UKG read as UKG Pro Succession Planning
UKG Pro read as UKG Pro Succession Planning
Workday read as Workday Succession Planning
Workday HCM read as Workday Succession Planning
Workday Human Capital Management read as Workday Succession Planning
Workday Succession read as Workday Succession Planning
Workday Talent read as Workday Succession Planning
Workday Talent Management read as Workday Succession Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Accendo
Agentive
Bullseye Succession Planning
CharlieHR – Free Succession Planning Template
Cornerstone Performance / Cornerstone Succession
Disprz – Succession Planning Template & Checklist
Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel templates
LinovHR
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM Talent Management
Qandle
SeraPoint
Sigma Assessment Systems – Free Template Library
Smartleader
Smartsheet – Free Succession Planning Templates
Talent Successor
Which Framework – Free Succession Planning Tool
Your existing HCM's succession module
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.