Index › HR › Performance and talent management › Succession planning › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Succession planning for small business buyers

Asked as “succession planning software”, and as “talent review tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Teamflect 12%
29PerformYard12Teamflect10SuccessionNow48others

29% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: PerformYard (29%) replaces BambooHR (18% then, 4% now), 25 points clear, past the 13-point floor.PerformYard leads at 29%, replacing BambooHR, which led at 18% and stands at 4% now: 25 points clear, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01PerformYard29%0%42accepted challenger▲+18Since October 2026: 11% → 29%, +18 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.11% → 29%
02Teamflect12%0%14accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 12%
03SuccessionNow10%12%32accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 10%
04BambooHR4%0%23accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 18% → 4%, −14 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.18% → 4%
05Lattice4%15%27accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 4%
06Creately2%7%15accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%
07Maus2%0%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
0815Five2%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
09Paycom2%42%12criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development0%100%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Workday Succession Planning0%93%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Cornerstone Succession0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10SuccessionHR0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
M07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01PerformYard29%
02Teamflect12%
03SuccessionNow10%
04BambooHR4%
05Lattice4%
06Creately2%
07Maus2%
0815Five2%
09Paycom2%
10SuccessionHR0%
11Cornerstone Succession0%
12Workday Succession Planning0%
13SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
100%
16 of 16 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Platforms like SAP SuccessFactors are designed for large enterprises with extensive HR stacks. They often come with high implementation costs, steep learning curves, and are overkill for a small business.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Workday Succession Planning
93%
13 of 14 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Large HR platforms (like those from SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM, or similar enterprise suites) ... are often massive overkill for small businesses.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Cornerstone Succession
64%
7 of 11 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“avoid enterprise suites (e.g., SAP SuccessFactors or Cornerstone) as they're overkill and expensive for SMBs” Grok 4.20, comparative prompt
Lattice
15%
4 of 27 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“I wouldn't make Lattice my first choice for a small business unless you expect to use more of its platform: it lists a $4,000 minimum annual agreement” GPT-6 Luna, paraphrase prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 807 links across 165 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

41 answers · 71 citations · 12 models
40 answers · 76 citations · 11 models
36 answers · 69 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G221 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group20 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FirstHR19 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
vendor site · PerformYard12 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Disprz12 answers · 12 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best succession planning software”, “succession planning software”, “succession planning tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
PerformYard performyard.com
PerformYard 29%, PerformYard – Talent Development 2%
31%2179,9003458,643$2547
Teamflect teamflect.com12%1368801212,59230
SuccessionNow successionnow.com10%730200
Leapsome leapsome.com6%3782,9003251,450$18,53160
AssessTEAM assessteam.com6%5614003,0975
BambooHR bamboohr.com4%107490,5005511,055,247$44,698106
Lattice lattice.com4%62590,50013,900122,123$1,328120
Paycor paycor.com4%178673,0001,8181,002,900120
TalentHR talenthr.io4%89480189,83132
Creately creately.com2%672,400797,895383,4463

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 17 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best succession planning software” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best succession planning software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which talent review tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top succession planning tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best succession planning software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a succession planning software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which succession planning tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Paycor
Four alternativesBambooHR, Engagedly, PerformYard, Succession Wizard
no first choiceChangedPaycor
Five alternativesBambooHR, PerformYard, Succession Wizard, Teamflect, Zoho People
Paycor, Zoho People
Five alternativesBambooHR, Bitrix24, ELMO Software, OrangeHRM, PerformYard
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniPaycom
Two alternativesCornerstone Succession, Quantum Workplace
against: SAP, Workday Succession Planning
AssessTEAMChanged
Two alternativesLattice, Teamflect
SuccessionHR
Four alternativesLattice, Plum, UKG Pro Succession Planning, UKG Ready
against: Workday Succession Planning, Workday Talent Optimization
Teamflect
One alternativetalyzr
against: Paycom
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashPerformYard
Five alternativesChartHop, ClearCompany, Notion, Teamflect, monday work management
against: Cornerstone Succession, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning
LatticeChanged
Three alternatives15Five, BambooHR, PerformYard
PerformYard
Seven alternativesChartHop, Lattice, Leapsome, SIGMA Succession, Structured Spreadsheets / Notion Templates, SuccessionNow, Teamflect
against: SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning
Teamflect
Five alternativesChartHop, Empxtrack, Google Sheets, PerformYard, Pingboard
against: Cornerstone Succession, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
no first choice
Five alternativesBambooHR, ChartHop, Lattice, Leapsome, PerformYard
against: Cornerstone Succession, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning
against: Cornerstone Succession, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning
Perplexity SonarLattice
Four alternativesLeapsome, PerformYard, SuccessionNow, monday work management
against: Cornerstone Succession, Dayforce, PeopleFluent Succession Management, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
PerformYardChanged
Two alternatives15Five, BambooHR
Lattice
Five alternativesCreately, Leapsome, Peoplebox, Succession Wizard, Teamflect
against: monday work management
PerformYard
Two alternativesCreately, Peoplebox
against: Lattice, SuccessionHR, SuccessionNow
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.20PerformYard
Three alternativesClayHR, Maus, SuccessionNow
against: SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning
LeapsomeChanged
Three alternatives15Five, BambooHR, Lattice
against: SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning
Peoplebox, SuccessionNow
Two alternativesPerformYard, Teamflect
against: Cornerstone Succession, Lattice, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
PerformYard
Two alternativesMaus, Teamflect
against: SuccessionNow
no first choiceagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Developmentnothing named
Mistral SmallPerformYard
Two alternativesMaus, SuccessionNow
against: Paycom, UKG Pro Succession Planning
BambooHR, TalentHRChangedagainst: Quantum Workplace, Workday Succession PlanningKollabHR, SuccessionNow
Three alternativesBambooHR, Lattice, SuccessionHR
Teamflect
Two alternativesBullseye Succession, SuccessionHR
no first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Developmentnothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashPerformYard, SuccessionNow
One alternativeMaus
against: Paycom
LeapsomeChanged
Four alternativesAssessTEAM, BambooHR, Lattice, PerformYard
against: Dayforce, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning
Trakstar
Three alternativesKollabHR, PerformYard, SuccessionNow
against: SuccessionHR
PerformYard Talent
Two alternativesCreately, SuccessionNow
no first choice
Four alternativesMaus, PerformYard, SuccessionHR, SuccessionNow
against: Lattice, Paycom, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, UKG Pro Succession Planning
against: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Workday Succession Planning
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashPerformYard
Three alternativesFactorial, Maus, SuccessionNow
AssessTEAM, PerformYardChanged
One alternativeBambooHR
SuccessionNow
Four alternativesClayHR, Creately, Miro, PerformYard
PerformYard
Three alternativesExcel, Maus, SuccessionNow
no first choice
Six alternativesBambooHR, Factorial, Gusto, Lattice, PerformYard, SuccessionNow
against: Dropbox, Excel, HubSpot, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development, Salesforce, Smartsheet, Workday Succession Planning, monday work management
Kimi K2Maus, SuccessionNow
One alternativePerformYard
against: Paycom
AssessTEAM, PerformYardChanged
Two alternatives15Five, Lattice
SuccessionNow
Three alternativesCreately, Lattice, PerformYard
Teamflect
Two alternativesBambooHR, PerformYard
against: SuccessionNow
SuccessionNow
Four alternativesPaycom, PerformYard, Spreadsheets, Successionly
against: Paycor
nothing named
GLM 4.7 FlashXPerformYard
Two alternativesSuccessionHR, SuccessionNow
BambooHRChanged
Three alternativesLattice, Nine Box Maker, Performly
SuccessionHR, SuccessionNow
Seven alternativesBambooHR, Bullseye, Disprz, Factorial, Lattice, Maus, Paycom
against: Creately, Ingentis org.manager
PerformYard
Two alternativesCreately, Factorial
no first choiceagainst: 9‑Box Talent Grids, SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
MiniMax M2.5SuccessionNow
Two alternativesBambooHR, PerformYard
Leapsome, PerformYardChanged
Three alternatives15Five, AssessTEAM, Lattice
PerformYard, Trakstar
Two alternativesPaycom, SuccessionNow
Creately
One alternativePerformYard
no first choiceagainst: Workday Succession Planningnothing named
GPT-6 LunaTeamflect
Two alternativesCreately, Lattice
15FiveChanged
One alternativePerformYard
against: Lattice
Teamflect
Three alternatives15Five, Creately, Lattice
against: SuccessionNow
Excel, Google Sheets, Teamflect
One alternativeCreately
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BSuccessionNow
Two alternativesPaycom, PerformYard
TalentHRChanged
Two alternativesBambooHR, PerformYard
KollabHR, PerformYard
Three alternativesLattice, SuccessionHR, SuccessionNow
PerformYard – Talent Development
Two alternativesBambooHR – Core / Pro, Creately
no first choiceagainst: Cornerstone Succession, PeopleFluent Succession Management
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:32yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:36yes25 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:07yes917 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:56yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:28yes937 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:42yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:55yes1825 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:17yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:05yes942 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:06yes1037 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:04yes22187 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:01yes1956 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:42yes314 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:01yes918 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:00no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:16yes14 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:20no014 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:19yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:04yes543 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:29yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:23yes2419 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:50yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:49yes548 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:02yes1932 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:41yes2142 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:55yes876 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:52yes311 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:50yes1322 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:30yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:42yes610 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:43yes515 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:28yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:05yes1040 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:53yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:41yes2328 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:49yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:44yes935 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:36yes1123 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:52yes1487 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:07yes829 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:07yes520 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:49yes1123 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:29yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:42yes44 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:11yes515 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:19yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:10yes2239 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:56yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:06yes2221 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:53yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:42yes2538 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:50yes2553 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:21yes1853 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:41yes922 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:28yes29 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:40yes2428 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:21no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:34no04 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:21no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:35yes107 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:18yes534 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:14no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:06yes1428 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:54yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:54yes525 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:57yes1748 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:10yes939 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:12no016 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:18yes216 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:41yes1121 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:37yes199 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:17no03 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:08no015 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:17yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:17yes1229 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:27yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:03yes2127 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:34yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:58no028 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:09yes2333 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:12yes2081 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:52yes1950 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:54yes413 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:58yes1727 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CornerStone OnDemand read as Cornerstone Succession
Cornerstone read as Cornerstone Succession
Cornerstone OnDemand read as Cornerstone Succession
Deel read as Deel HR
Monday.com read as monday work management
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
PeopleFluent read as PeopleFluent Succession Management
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Succession & Development
TalentGuard read as TalentGuard Succession Planning
UKG read as UKG Pro Succession Planning
UKG Pro read as UKG Pro Succession Planning
Workday read as Workday Succession Planning
Workday Human Capital Management read as Workday Succession Planning
monday.com read as monday work management
Unresolved, counted raw
9‑Box Talent Grids
Arcoro
BambooHR – Core / Pro
Bullseye
Bullseye Engagement
Bullseye Succession
Excel template
Nine Box Maker
PerformYard Talent
PerformYard – Talent Development
Performly
Regions Bank
SBA
SIGMA Succession
Saffron
Structured Spreadsheets / Notion Templates
Talent360
Workhuman Future Leaders
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Skills intelligenceTalent intelligence →