SuccessionNow is a dedicated succession planning software tool for organizations of various sizes · successionnow.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
PerformYard is first at 29%.
Lattice is first at 30%. 3 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Workday Succession Planning is first at 34%.
“If your priority is a focused succession solution with minimal complexity: Consider SuccessionNow, PerformYard, or SuccessionHR.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · first choice
“If you ONLY care about who replaces the CEO/Director: Go with SuccessionNow. It is purpose-built and avoids "bloat."”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with PerformYard or SuccessionNow if you want a dedicated succession planning tool”Kimi K2 · Direct question · first choice
“PerformYard or SuccessionNow offer good balance of features, usability, and value”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“it's less ideal for very tight budgets—pricing starts at ~$2,995/year flat rate”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as SuccessionNow, over the 73 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 13 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 4 | View → | |
| 25 | 1 | View → | |
| 24 | 1 | View → | |
| 21 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 3 | View → | |
| 16 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → | |
| 15 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 14 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of SuccessionNow →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on SuccessionNow's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 73 of the 73 answers that named SuccessionNow and are not a share of its labels.
343 of the 343 domain citations in answers naming SuccessionNow came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |