7 categories · RankedChartHop
ChartHop is an organizational intelligence platform for people analytics, headcount planning and HCM, with modules covering areas such as compensation and org charts · charthop.com ↗
1 more
Strongest at mid-market, contested with Organimi. Ranked 13 of 87 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Organimi is first at 38%.
Ranked first, contested: Organimi has 14%. 9 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ingentis org.manager is first at 18%.
Why models recommend it
“If you need the org chart to stay current with HR data ... ChartHop, Workleap Pingboard, FirstHR, BambooHR, Deel, Factorial, or Ingentis org.manager are the best choices.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · first choice
“ChartHop | Top Pick for Mid-Market | Extremely user-friendly; offers real-time org visibility, headcount, and compensation planning in one dashboard.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“Need deep, self-serve analytics and benchmarking with minimal IT lift → Crunchr or ChartHop. Both are cited specifically for mid-market teams.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
“ChartHop – frequently cited for mid-market org design, headcount and compensation planning with a modular per-employee pricing model.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
What gives them pause
“its current site asks you to request a tailored proposal rather than showing a public price, so check the quote before shortlisting it”GPT-6 Luna · Budget-constrained question · warning
“full-featured enterprise tiers of tools like ChartHop or OrgChart ... are often costly overkill for small-to-medium businesses”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Enterprise options like Visier, Workday, or ChartHop ... start at $10k+/year, making them unsuitable for limited budgets”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“ChartHop's real entry rate is $5 per employee per month for Core, not the $8 that circulates on comparison sites.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as ChartHop, over the 419 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 116 | 15 | Compare → | |
| 106 | 22 | Compare → | |
| 97 | 38 | Compare → | |
| 97 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 86 | 13 | Compare → | |
| 75 | 22 | Compare → | |
| 75 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 74 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 73 | 15 | View → | |
| 67 | 12 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of ChartHop →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on ChartHop's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- HR and Finance teams at small businesses to large enterprises
- Price stated
- We charge a transparent base fee per employee, per month (PEPM). You only pay for the specific modules you need—like Headcount Planning or Compensation—so the platform grows right alongside your headcount.
- Integrations
- 100
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II
- Customers named
- Sweetgreen, 1Password, Truework, Rexall, Fanatics, Zapier, Toyota Connected, Korn Ferry
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 380 of the 419 answers that named ChartHop and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
841 of the 841 domain citations in answers naming ChartHop came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 9 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 19 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 13 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 14 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| Kimi K2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 14 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | undated | |||
| Blog | 9 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 9 | undated | HRIS and HCM platforms, Workforce planning | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | undated | Org charts, Performance management | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Case study | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page charthop.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.