Org charts and org design for small business buyers
Asked as “org chart software”, and as “organizational design tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
38%
Contested · Pingboard 18%
38Organimi18Pingboard15Lucidchart29others
38% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+6Since October 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Organimi held the lead, +6 points on 32%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Organimi38%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
ChartHop28%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Ingentis org.manager18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Ingentis org.manager (18%) replaces Orgvue (24% then, 15% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →
Organimi38%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketChartHop28%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseIngentis org.manager18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Ingentis org.manager (18%) replaces Orgvue (24% then, 15% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Organimi38%0%57endorsed leader▲+6Since October 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.32% → 38%
Organimi38%0%57endorsed leader▲+6Since October 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.32% → 38%02
Pingboard18%5%38accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 11% → 18%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 18%
Pingboard18%5%38accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 11% → 18%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 18%03
Lucidchart15%17%69accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 19% → 15%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.19% → 15%
Lucidchart15%17%69accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 19% → 15%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.19% → 15%04
diagrams.net7%11%19accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 7%
diagrams.net7%11%19accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 7%05
Miro5%15%47accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
Miro5%15%47accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%06
Canva5%26%23criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
Canva5%26%23criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%07
Microsoft Visio2%33%33criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Microsoft Visio2%33%33criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
OrgChart0%70%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
OrgChart0%70%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
SmartDraw0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SmartDraw0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08ChartHop0%25%36criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
ChartHop0%25%36criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%11
Functionly0%24%17accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Functionly0%24%17accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%09
Creately0%12%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Creately0%12%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10
BambooHR0%8%12accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
BambooHR0%8%12accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartHop vs OrgChartChartHop vs PingboardChartHop vs OrgvueChartHop vs MiroOrganimi vs LucidchartOrganimi vs FunctionlyOrganimi vs OrgChartOrganimi vs PingboardOrganimi vs OrgvueOrganimi vs MiroLucidchart vs FunctionlyLucidchart vs OrgChartLucidchart vs PingboardLucidchart vs OrgvueLucidchart vs MiroFunctionly vs OrgChartFunctionly vs PingboardFunctionly vs OrgvueFunctionly vs MiroOrgChart vs PingboardOrgChart vs OrgvueOrgChart vs MiroPingboard vs OrgvuePingboard vs MiroOrgvue vs Miro
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Organimi38%
Organimi38%02Pingboard18%
Pingboard18%03Lucidchart15%
Lucidchart15%04diagrams.net7%
diagrams.net7%05Miro5%
Miro5%06Canva5%
Canva5%07Microsoft Visio2%
Microsoft Visio2%08ChartHop0%
ChartHop0%09Creately0%
Creately0%10BambooHR0%
BambooHR0%11Functionly0%
Functionly0%12SmartDraw0%
SmartDraw0%13OrgChart0%
OrgChart0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Lucidchart17%
12 of 69 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid manual diagramming tools (Visio/Lucid) *for ongoing management* because they create data debt.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Visio33%
11 of 33 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid manual diagramming tools (Visio/Lucid) *for ongoing management* because they create data debt.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
OrgChart70%
7 of 10 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Some tools like OrgChart have interfaces described as "dated and next to impossible for the average user," requiring either a dedicated power user or expensive professional services.” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Miro15%
7 of 47 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Why avoid: ... its free plan and even paid plans for larger teams can become expensive.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 591 links across 137 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
41 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Planfix41 answers · 41 citations · 12 models
38 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zapier32 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G226 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GoProfiles18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
vendor site · FirstHR11 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
9 answers · 9 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 10 models
41 answers · 12 models
38 answers · 10 models
31 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 5 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best org chart software”, “org chart software”, “org chart tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organimi organimi.com | 38% | 115 | 1,300 | 7 | 58,699 | 7 | 1 | |
| Pingboard pingboard.com | 18% | 94 | 2,400 | 2 | 265 | |||
| Lucidchart lucid.co | 15% | 164 | 74,000 | 878 | 684,398 | $313 | 120 | 9 |
| draw.io drawio.com diagrams.net 7%, draw.io 2% | 9% | 40 | 90,500 | 1,096 | 141,930 | |||
| Miro miro.com | 5% | 96 | 135,000 | 3,760 | 1,089,824 | 120 | ||
| Canva canva.com | 5% | 58 | 24,900,000 | 183,421 | 81,177,765 | 101 | ||
| Microsoft Visio microsoft.com | 2% | 97 | 22,200 | 1,019 | 145,358,109 | $12,455 | 103 | 3 |
| HubSpot hubspot.com HubSpot CRM 2% | 2% | 7 | 368,000 | 9,776 | 2,276,428 company | $83,922 | 76 | |
| Ninety.io | 2% | |||||||
| Value Chain Analysis | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (goprofiles.io, peoplemanagingpeople.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best org chart software” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best org chart software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which organizational design tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top org chart tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best org chart software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an org chart software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which org chart tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PingboardValue Chain AnalysisChangedOrganimiagainst: PingboardOrganimino first choiceagainst: Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Four alternatives
BambooHR, Org Chart Studio, Organimi, draw.ioThree alternatives
Business Model Canvas, Customer Journey Mapping, Organizational Structure DesignThree alternatives
Canva, Creately, LucidchartTwo alternatives
Creately, Org Chart StudioGPT-5.4 miniLucidchartLucidchartHeldCreatelyCanva, Microsoft Visioagainst: Lucidchartno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Diligent Entities, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, PingboardThree alternatives
Microsoft Visio, Miro, OrganimiFour alternatives
Canva, Microsoft Visio, Organimi, Plumsail Org ChartGemini 3.5 FlashPingboardNinety.ioChangedLucidchartCanva, LucidchartPingboardagainst: Canva, Google Docs, Microsoft PowerPointagainst: Microsoft Visio, OmniGraffle, Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
Six alternatives
BambooHR, Gusto, Lucidchart, Organimi, Rippling, The OrgThree alternatives
Lucidchart, Miro, NotionSeven alternatives
BambooHR, Canva, Gusto, Organimi, Pingboard, Rippling, The OrgFour alternatives
ChartHop, Google Drawings, Miro, OrganimiNine alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, Cognode, Gusto, Justworks, Lucidchart, Miro, Rippling, The OrgPerplexity SonarOrganimiagainst: GoProfiles, OrgChart, SiftMiroChangedagainst: FunctionlyOrganimiagainst: ChartHop, SiftOrganimino first choiceagainst: Canva, ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, diagrams.net
Three alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, diagrams.netTwo alternatives
Creately, Microsoft VisioSix alternatives
Canva, Creately, Factorial, Lucidchart, Miro, diagrams.netTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, diagrams.netGrok 4.20Lucidchartagainst: Ingentis org.manager, diagrams.netOrganimiChangedagainst: Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft VisioLucidchart, Organimi, Pingboardagainst: Functionly, Ingentis org.manager, SmartDrawOrganimiOrganimi, Pingboardagainst: Ingentis org.manager, SAP SuccessFactorsagainst: Bizneo, ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Lattice, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, OrgPlus, Pingboard
Two alternatives
Organimi, PingboardThree alternatives
Functionly, Lucidchart, MiroTwo alternatives
Creately, MiroFour alternatives
Canva, Lucidchart, Miro, diagrams.netTwo alternatives
ChartHop, LucidchartMistral SmallOrganimi, PingboardLucidchart, MiroChangedOrganimiOrganimi, diagrams.netno first choiceagainst: Factorial, Miro, OrgChart, SmartDraw
One alternative
LucidchartThree alternatives
Asana, ClickUp, HubSpot CRMSeven alternatives
Functionly, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Pingboard, SmartDraw, diagrams.netTwo alternatives
Canva, LucidchartDeepSeek V4 FlashPingboardLucidchartChangedOrganimiagainst: ChartHopLucidchart, OrganimiOrganimi, TeamOrgChartagainst: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visioagainst: Canva, ChartHop, Functionly, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart
Six alternatives
ChartHop, Functionly, Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, SmartDrawFour alternatives
ChartHop, Functionly, Organimi, diagrams.netThree alternatives
Lucidchart, Miro, PingboardTwo alternatives
GoProfiles, diagrams.netOne alternative
GoProfilesLlama 4 MaverickPingboardno first choiceChangedno first choiceOrganimino first choiceagainst: Functionly
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Miro, OrganimiThree alternatives
Functionly, Lucidchart, MiroQwen 3.7 FlashOrganimiOrganimiHeldOrganimidiagrams.netno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Canva, EdrawSoft, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, SAP SuccessFactors, SmartDraw, Workday, draw.io
Three alternatives
Canva, Lucidchart, PingboardThree alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, MiroThree alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, PingboardTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, OrganimiSix alternatives
GoProfiles, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, PingboardKimi K2OrganimiHubSpot CRMChangedOrganimiOrganimiLucidchart, Organimiagainst: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart
Two alternatives
Lucidchart, PingboardFive alternatives
Baserow, Bigin by Zoho CRM, Lucidchart, Monday.com, PipedriveThree alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, PingboardTwo alternatives
Miro, diagrams.netTwo alternatives
ChartHop, PingboardGLM 4.7 FlashXOrganimi, PingboardMiroChangedno first choiceOrganimi, diagrams.netagainst: Canvano first choiceagainst: Atlassian Atlas, Creately, Factorial, FigJam, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Ninety, OrgChart, OrgPlus RealTime, Planfix, Sift, Venngage
Two alternatives
ChartHop, LucidchartTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, McKinsey 7S FrameworkEight alternatives
ChartHop, Creately, Lucidchart, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard, Planfix, diagrams.netTwo alternatives
GoProfiles, MiroMiniMax M2.5PingboardOrganimiChangedOrganimiCanva, draw.iono first choiceagainst: OrgChart
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Factorial, Lucidchart, OrganimiFour alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Miro, PingboardFour alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Miro, PingboardOne alternative
PingboardGPT-6 LunaOrganimino first choiceChangedCanva, Lucidchartagainst: TeamOrgChartdiagrams.netno first choiceagainst: Canva, ChartHop, Lucidchart, Miro
One alternative
LucidchartTwo alternatives
Miro, OrganimiOne alternative
CanvaThree alternatives
Lucidchart, Sift, Visio web appMuse Glimmer 30BPingboardno first choiceChangedOrganimi, PingboardOrganimiagainst: Lucidchartno first choiceagainst: ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, SmartDraw
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, OrganimiThree alternatives
Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, MiroThree alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, MiroTwo alternatives
Miro, diagrams.netBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 7 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 8 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 8 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 11 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:25 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:14 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:55 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 10 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:59 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 5 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 18 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 8 | 145 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 7 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 8 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:56 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:37 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:33 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:40 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:18 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:20 | no | 0 | 64 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:27 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:07 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:59 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 11 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 21 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 13 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 14 | 69 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel HR read as Deel
Ingentis read as Ingentis org.manager
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite (Lucidchart) read as Lucidchart
Lucidchart / Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
PowerPoint read as Microsoft PowerPoint
Unresolved, counted raw
BambooHR's built-in chart
Baserow
Bigin by Zoho CRM
Business Model Canvas
CakeHR
Canva Org Chart
Cognode
Customer Journey Mapping
EdrawSoft
Google Workspace Org Chart add-ons
McKinsey 7S Framework
Ninety.io
OmniGraffle
OrgPlease
Organizational Structure Design
Value Chain Analysis
Visio web app
Wondershare
Wondershare SmartDraw
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.