Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Org charts › ChartHop vs Pingboard
Org charts and org design · November 2026 Edition

ChartHop vs Pingboard

Nine of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; two named Pingboard. ChartHop was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Pingboard by twelve and ChartHop carries 48 labels and Pingboard 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.

ChartHop

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

Pingboard

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share28%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels4835A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ChartHop reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lucidchart was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs Lucidchart · ChartHop vs Functionly

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ChartHopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPingboard
Direct92
Paraphrase401 against Pingboard
Comparative54
Budget-constrained001 against Pingboard
Scale-constrained311 against Pingboard
Negative321 against ChartHop · 4 against Pingboard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, ChartHop and Pingboard were named in the same answer eighty-six times, of the 419 answers naming ChartHop and the 114 naming Pingboard. In those answers Pingboard took the first choice thirteen times and ChartHop eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ChartHop and Pingboard stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
ChartHop Pingboard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and Pingboard on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ChartHop and Pingboard stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Kimi K2ChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Lucidchart

ChartHop first, Pingboard an alternative

8 of 14 modelsPingboard was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
Mistral SmallChartHop, OrgChart alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, Workleap
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Functionly, OrgChart
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop, Organizational Charts alternatives: BambooHR, Rippling, iOrgChart
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
MiniMax M2.5Built, ChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Workleap
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: OrgChart

Pingboard first, ChartHop an alternative

1 of 14 modelsChartHop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Pingboard alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, Factorial, Personio

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.20Lucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Creately, Functionly, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard
Muse Glimmer 30BLucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Organimi, Pingboard

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: Lucid, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Llama 4 MaverickLucidchart alternatives: Miro, Planfix

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Pingboard leads by eighteen points.
Pingboard18%#2 of 13
ChartHop0%#8 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: ChartHop leads at mid-market.
ChartHop28%#1 of 15
Pingboard5%#6 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
ChartHop leads by sixteen points.
ChartHop16%#2 of 13
Pingboard0%#12 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about ChartHop

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“full-featured enterprise tiers of tools like ChartHop or OrgChart ... are often costly overkill for small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you need the org chart to stay current with HR data ... ChartHop, Workleap Pingboard, FirstHR, BambooHR, Deel, Factorial, or Ingentis org.manager are the best choices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Pingboard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Updates are mostly manual unless you set up custom automation, and it lacks native HRIS-level directory syncing” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“simple org chart software (like Pingboard) lacks the data-driven modeling needed for strategic planning” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“those are more HR-platform style products and can cost more than a simple diagramming tool” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Better alternatives: ... Tools with built‑in employee directories and live updates (e.g., Pingboard, ChartHop, Organimi, Ingentis, etc.)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice
“A dedicated org chart + directory tool — it keeps charts automatically current by syncing with your HR system” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Most mid-market B2B companies find Pingboard or ChartHop to be the sweet spot” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.