Org charts and org design · November 2026 Edition
ChartHop vs Functionly
Nine of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; zero named Functionly. ChartHop was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Functionly by eight and ChartHop carries 48 labels and Functionly 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share28%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels4821A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ChartHop reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lucidchart was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs Lucidchart · ChartHop vs OrgChart
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ChartHopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFunctionly
Direct90
Paraphrase45
Comparative50
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained30
Negative301 against ChartHop
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ChartHop and Functionly stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
ChartHop Functionly first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and Functionly on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ChartHop and Functionly stood in it.
ChartHop first, Functionly an alternative
9 of 14 modelsFunctionly was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
Mistral SmallChartHop, OrgChart alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, Workleap
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Functionly, OrgChart
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop, Organizational Charts alternatives: BambooHR, Rippling, iOrgChart
Kimi K2ChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Lucidchart
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
MiniMax M2.5Built, ChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Workleap
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: OrgChart
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Pingboard alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, Factorial, Personio
Grok 4.20Lucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Creately, Functionly, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard
Muse Glimmer 30BLucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Organimi, Pingboard
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: Lucid, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Llama 4 MaverickLucidchart alternatives: Miro, Planfix
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
ChartHop0%#8 of 13Functionly0%#11 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
ChartHop leads by nineteen points.
ChartHop28%#1 of 15Functionly9%#4 of 15Enterprise
ChartHop leads by sixteen points.
ChartHop16%#2 of 13Functionly0%#– of 13What the models said about ChartHop
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“full-featured enterprise tiers of tools like ChartHop or OrgChart ... are often costly overkill for small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you need the org chart to stay current with HR data ... ChartHop, Workleap Pingboard, FirstHR, BambooHR, Deel, Factorial, or Ingentis org.manager are the best choices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Functionly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For a mid-sized B2B company (typically ~150–1,500 employees), Functionly is the strongest fit for organizational design.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Functionly (Collaborative Design) or Ingentis/orgChart (Chart & Analytics)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend Functionly as the top organizational design tool for a mid-sized B2B company” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
ChartHop vs OrganimiChartHop vs LucidchartChartHop vs OrgChartChartHop vs PingboardChartHop vs OrgvueChartHop vs MiroOrganimi vs FunctionlyLucidchart vs FunctionlyFunctionly vs OrgChartFunctionly vs PingboardFunctionly vs OrgvueFunctionly vs MiroAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full org charts standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.