Organimi vs Functionly
Zero of fourteen models named Organimi first on the direct prompt; zero named Functionly. Organimi was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Functionly by eight and Organimi carries 44 labels and Functionly 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
OrganimiFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFunctionly
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Organimi and Functionly were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 119 answers naming Organimi and the 39 naming Functionly. In those answers Functionly took the first choice one time and Organimi thirteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Organimi Functionly first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Organimi on the left and Functionly on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Organimi38%#1 of 13Functionly0%#11 of 13What the models said about Organimi
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Organimi – ⚠️ Be Cautious - Scalability issues: Not suitable for large organizations” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good for very small teams or startups, but may not scale well beyond ~100 users.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · soft negative
“Simplicity, employee directories | Smaller HR teams” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Organimi is recommended as the best org chart software for businesses looking for an affordable solution, with a free plan” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The best org chart software for a company with a limited budget is Organimi, which is completely free for up to 25 users” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall affordability: Organimi ... Organimi is the most commonly recommended value pick” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Functionly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For a mid-sized B2B company (typically ~150–1,500 employees), Functionly is the strongest fit for organizational design.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Functionly (Collaborative Design) or Ingentis/orgChart (Chart & Analytics)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend Functionly as the top organizational design tool for a mid-sized B2B company” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.