Org charts and org design · November 2026 Edition
Functionly vs Orgvue
Zero of fourteen models named Functionly first on the direct prompt; zero named Orgvue. Functionly was named by eight of the fourteen models and Orgvue by nine and Functionly carries 21 labels and Orgvue 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share9%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%30%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2110A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Functionly reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Functionly · ChartHop vs Orgvue · Organimi vs Functionly
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FunctionlyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOrgvue
Direct00
Paraphrase513 against Orgvue
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained01
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Functionly and Orgvue stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Functionly Orgvue first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Functionly on the left and Orgvue on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Functionly and Orgvue stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Grok 4.20Lucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Creately, Functionly, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard
Mistral SmallChartHop, OrgChart alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, Workleap
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Functionly, OrgChart
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Pingboard alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, Factorial, Personio
GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: Lucid, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
Llama 4 MaverickLucidchart alternatives: Miro, Planfix
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop, Organizational Charts alternatives: BambooHR, Rippling, iOrgChart
Kimi K2ChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Lucidchart
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
MiniMax M2.5Built, ChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Workleap
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: OrgChart
Muse Glimmer 30BLucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Organimi, Pingboard
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Orgvue is not named for this buyer.
Functionly0%#11 of 13Orgvue—not namedMid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: Orgvue leads at enterprise.
Orgvue15%#3 of 13Functionly0%#– of 13What the models said about Functionly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For a mid-sized B2B company (typically ~150–1,500 employees), Functionly is the strongest fit for organizational design.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Functionly (Collaborative Design) or Ingentis/orgChart (Chart & Analytics)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend Functionly as the top organizational design tool for a mid-sized B2B company” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Orgvue
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Invest in Orgvue/Ingentis only if you have dedicated budget for complex workforce costing and global compliance requirements.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd generally recommend Orgvue if your main need is organizational design plus workforce planning” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Tools like *ChartHop*, *OrgVue*, or *Pingboard*.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for Deep Enterprise-Grade Modeling: Orgvue ... Caveat: Higher learning curve and significantly higher price point” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared
ChartHop vs FunctionlyChartHop vs OrgvueOrganimi vs FunctionlyOrganimi vs OrgvueLucidchart vs FunctionlyLucidchart vs OrgvueFunctionly vs OrgChartFunctionly vs PingboardFunctionly vs MiroOrgChart vs OrgvuePingboard vs OrgvueOrgvue vs MiroAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full org charts standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.