Org charts and org design for enterprise buyers
Asked as “org chart software”, and as “organizational design tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 62 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
18%
Contested · ChartHop 16%
18Ingentis org.manager16ChartHop15Orgvue52others
18% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Ingentis org.manager (18%) replaces Orgvue (24% then, 15% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Ingentis org.manager leads at 18%, replacing Orgvue, which led at 24% and stands at 15% now: 3 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Organimi38%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
ChartHop28%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Ingentis org.manager18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Ingentis org.manager (18%) replaces Orgvue (24% then, 15% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This page
Organimi38%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 32% → 38%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop28%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseIngentis org.manager18%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Ingentis org.manager (18%) replaces Orgvue (24% then, 15% now), 3 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Ingentis org.manager18%5%44accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 12% → 18%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 18%
Ingentis org.manager18%5%44accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 12% → 18%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 18%02ChartHop16%11%47accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 20% → 16%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.20% → 16%
ChartHop16%11%47accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 20% → 16%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.20% → 16%03
Orgvue15%0%21accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 24% → 15%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.24% → 15%
Orgvue15%0%21accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 24% → 15%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.24% → 15%04
OrgChart10%3%34accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 7% → 10%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 10%
OrgChart10%3%34accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 7% → 10%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 10%05
Workday5%29%17criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
Workday5%29%17criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%06Organimi5%44%18criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
Organimi5%44%18criticized challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%07
Nakisa Org Design Suite2%9%11accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%
Nakisa Org Design Suite2%9%11accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 3% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 2%08
Lucidchart2%39%54criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
Lucidchart2%39%54criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%09
SAP SuccessFactors2%36%14criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
SAP SuccessFactors2%36%14criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%10
Miro2%62%21criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Miro2%62%21criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Microsoft Visio0%53%36criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
Microsoft Visio0%53%36criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%12
Pingboard0%33%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Pingboard0%33%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11Sift0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartHop vs OrgChartChartHop vs PingboardChartHop vs OrgvueChartHop vs MiroOrganimi vs LucidchartOrganimi vs FunctionlyOrganimi vs OrgChartOrganimi vs PingboardOrganimi vs OrgvueOrganimi vs MiroLucidchart vs FunctionlyLucidchart vs OrgChartLucidchart vs PingboardLucidchart vs OrgvueLucidchart vs MiroFunctionly vs OrgChartFunctionly vs PingboardFunctionly vs OrgvueFunctionly vs MiroOrgChart vs PingboardOrgChart vs OrgvueOrgChart vs MiroPingboard vs OrgvuePingboard vs MiroOrgvue vs Miro
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910S11
1213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Ingentis org.manager18%
Ingentis org.manager18%02ChartHop16%
ChartHop16%03Orgvue15%
Orgvue15%04OrgChart10%
OrgChart10%05Workday5%
Workday5%06Organimi5%
Organimi5%07Nakisa Org Design Suite2%
Nakisa Org Design Suite2%08Lucidchart2%
Lucidchart2%09SAP SuccessFactors2%
SAP SuccessFactors2%10Miro2%
Miro2%11Sift0%
12Pingboard0%
Pingboard0%13Microsoft Visio0%
Microsoft Visio0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Visio53%
19 of 36 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Microsoft Visio: It is excellent for static diagrams, but it requires manual maintenance (no HRIS integration), which is impossible to scale” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
Lucidchart39%
21 of 54 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Lucidchart/Miro: Their auto-layout engines can produce confusing spatial arrangements for complex, matrixed structures.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Miro62%
13 of 21 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“General-purpose whiteboards and design canvases such as Miro or Canva — useful for discussing a proposed reorganization; don’t treat a board as the canonical employee hierarchy” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
Pingboard33%
10 of 30 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Basic or Free Org Chart Apps (e.g., Organimi for non-enterprise use, Pingboard lower tiers...) ... Poor scalability, weak security” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 892 links across 187 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 7 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Zapier40 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Planfix40 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G234 answers · 57 citations · 13 models
32 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
vendor site · TheOrgChart.com29 answers · 57 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Nakisa24 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GoProfiles22 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Jostle17 answers · 17 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Organimi14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
40 answers · 12 models
38 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 11 models
14 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best org chart software”, “org chart software”, “org chart tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ingentis ingentis.com Ingentis org.manager 18% | 18% | 73 | 30 | 0 | 11,481 company | 5 | ||
| ChartHop charthop.com | 16% | 380 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | ||
| Orgvue orgvue.com | 15% | 107 | 880 | 10 | 20,029 | $9,026 | 22 | |
| Nakisa nakisa.com Nakisa Org Chart Suite 10%, Nakisa Org Design Suite 2%, Nakisa Workforce Planning 2%, Nakisa HR Suite 2% | 15% | 19 | 320 | 74 | 5,231 | 7 | ||
| OrgChart orgchartstudio.com | 10% | 66 | 33,100 | 5 | 428 | |||
| Workday workday.com | 5% | 352 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 | 80 | ||
| Organimi organimi.com | 5% | 115 | 1,300 | 7 | 58,699 | 7 | 1 | |
| OrgPlease! orgplease.com | 3% | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Lucidchart lucid.co | 2% | 164 | 74,000 | 878 | 684,398 | $313 | 120 | 9 |
| OneDirectory onedirectory.com | 2% | 5 | 170 | 0 | 3,468 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.jostle.me, goprofiles.io, organimi.com, theorgchart.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best org chart software” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best org chart software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which organizational design tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade org chart tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best org chart software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an org chart software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which org chart tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Ingentis org.managerLucidchart, Miro, OrgChart, SmartDrawChangedno first choiceOrganimino first choiceagainst: Canva, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, OrgChart, OrgvueSix alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Korn Ferry's Design Platform, Org Relationships, OrganizeMe, SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayNine alternatives
Beyond Intranet, ChartHop, GoProfiles, Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayThree alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartGPT-5.4 miniWorkdayOrgvueChangedLucidchartOrgvueagainst: Lucidchart, Pingboardno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Visio, Miro
Five alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, OrgChart, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactorsOne alternative
Workday Adaptive PlanningSeven alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Microsoft Visio, Miro, OrgChart, Orgvue, Personio, SiftOne alternative
OrgChartGemini 3.5 FlashChartHopOrgvueChangedagainst: Lucidchart, MiroNakisa Workforce Planning, OrgvueMicrosoft Org Explorer, Nakisa HR Suiteagainst: ChartHop, Lucidchart, PingboardChartHopagainst: Lucidchart, Miro, Workdayagainst: Canva, ChartLoop, Creately, Figma, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Oracle HCM Cloud, Organimi, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors, Sift, The Org, Workday
Eight alternatives
Lucidchart, Nakisa Hanelly, OrgChart, Organimi, Orgvue, Prolifiq MAP, Sift, Upland AltifyThree alternatives
ChartHop, Nakisa Hanelly, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Pingboard, SiftFour alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, OrgChart, SAP SuccessFactors, WorkdayTwo alternatives
OrgChart, PingboardPerplexity SonarIngentis org.managerOrgvueChangedChartHop, OrgChartagainst: Creately, Microsoft VisioOrganimiagainst: ChartHopno first choiceagainst: Canva, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Nakisa Org Design Suite
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, OrgChart, SiftTwo alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.managerSeven alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OneDirectory, Pingboard, Sift, TeamOrgChartOne alternative
Ingentis org.managerGrok 4.20Ingentis org.managerOrgvueChangedagainst: Functionly, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, MiroIngentis org.manageragainst: Organimi, PingboardIngentis org.manageragainst: ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, MiroNakisa Org Chart Suiteagainst: ChartHop, Organimi, Pingboardagainst: BambooHR, Creately, Excel, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi, Pingboard, SmartDraw, draw.io
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, PingboardFour alternatives
BCG's OrgBuilder, Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrganimiTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioTwo alternatives
Nakisa Org Chart Suite, WorkleapSeven alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft 365, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors, The OrgChart, WorkdayMistral SmallChartHop, Ingentis org.managerthe McKinsey 7-S FrameworkChangedIngentis org.manager, OrgvueIngentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Chart SuiteChartHopagainst: Microsoft Viva Insights, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Peakonagainst: Creately, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, SmartDraw
One alternative
LucidchartFour alternatives
Balanced Scorecard, Porter's Value Chain, SAFe, Spotify ModelThree alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioTwo alternatives
GoProfiles, WorkleapOne alternative
OrgChartDeepSeek V4 FlashNakisa Org Chart SuiteOrgvueChangedIngentis org.manager, OrgvueOrgPlease!against: Ingentis org.manager, OrgChart, Organimi, Pingboardno first choiceagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChartThree alternatives
BCG OrgBuilder, Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Design SuiteThree alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioOne alternative
LucidchartLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop, Ingentis org.managerChartHopChangedagainst: Microsoft PowerPointno first choiceIngentis org.manager, SAP SuccessFactors, Workdayagainst: Canvano first choiceagainst: Canva, Creately, Excel, Google Sheets, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Two alternatives
Microsoft Visio, PingboardTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, SAS Visual AnalyticsSix alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi, PingboardTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioKimi K2ChartHop, Ingentis org.managerNakisa Org Design SuiteChangedChartHopOrgChart, OrgPlease!against: ChartHopChartHop, Ingentis org.manageragainst: Canvaagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard, SAP SuccessFactors, SAP built-in modules, Workday
Two alternatives
Lucidchart, PingboardThree alternatives
Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCMEight alternatives
GoProfiles, Ingentis org.manager, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgChart, Pingboard, SiftTwo alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Design SuiteTwo alternatives
Pingboard, TheOrgChart.comGLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop, Ingentis org.managerNakisa Workforce Planning, OrgvueChangedChartHopOrgChartagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, MiroChartHopagainst: Creately, Excel, Google Sheets, Lucidchart, Miro, diagrams.net
Three alternatives
Jostle, Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioOne alternative
Ingentis org.managerFour alternatives
Ingentis org.manager, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OneDirectory, SmartDrawTwo alternatives
ChartHop, PingboardTwo alternatives
OrgChart, PingboardMiniMax M2.5Nakisa Org Chart Suite, OrgChartWorkdayChangedno first choiceOneDirectoryagainst: OrgPleaseNakisa Org Chart Suiteagainst: Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, and Word, Microsoft Visio, Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday
Two alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.managerFour alternatives
Microsoft Visio, OrgExplorer, Pingboard, Power BITwo alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.managerTwo alternatives
Lucidchart, OrgChartGPT-6 LunaOrganimi Sales ChartsOrgvueChangedno first choiceagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft VisioOrgChartno first choiceagainst: Canva, Excel, Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Miro, diagrams.net, draw.io
Three alternatives
ChartHop, DemandFarm, SquivrOne alternative
WorkdayFive alternatives
ChartHop, Nakisa Org Design Suite, OrgChart, Orgvue, Workday Organization Management / Org StudioTwo alternatives
Sift Org Chart, Simple Org ChartThree alternatives
ChartHop, Lucidchart, OrgChartMuse Glimmer 30BNakisa Org Chart SuiteOrgvueChangedLucidchart, Microsoft VisioOrgChart, Organimi, The Orgagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Mirono first choiceagainst: Lucidchart, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OrgChart, OrgvueTwo alternatives
ChartHop, Nakisa Org Design SuiteThree alternatives
ChartHop, Ingentis org.manager, OrgvueBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:49 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 21 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 21 | 78 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:09 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:19 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:13 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:04 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 15 | 45 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:05 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 23 | 55 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 23 | 96 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:01 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 20 | 93 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 24 | 84 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 12 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:49 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:53 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 9 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:51 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:38 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 23 | 70 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 1 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:05 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 12 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 22 | 72 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 11 | 67 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 22 | 75 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 2 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ingentis read as Ingentis org.manager
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Lucidchart / Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite read as Lucidchart
Nakisa read as Nakisa Org Design Suite
PowerPoint read as Microsoft PowerPoint
SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors
Unresolved, counted raw
BCG OrgBuilder
BCG's OrgBuilder
BCG's OrgBuilder tool
Balanced Scorecard
Creately's Organizational Design Software
Humantiv
Ingentis Org Design Software
Ingentis OrgManager
Korn Ferry's Design Platform
Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, and Word
Microsoft Org Explorer
Miro's Org Chart Creator
Nakisa Org Chart Software
Org Relationships
OrgDynamix
OrgExplorer
OrgPlease
Organimi Sales Charts
OrganizeMe
Orgasmic
Porter's Value Chain
Power BI org chart visuals
Prolifiq MAP
SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework)
SAP built-in modules
SAS Visual Analytics
Salesforce's own Buyer Relationship Map
Savi
Sift Org Chart
Simple Org Chart
Sociometer
Spotify Model
Squivr
The OrgChart (theorgchart.com)
Upland Altify
Visio Data Visualizer
Workday Organization Management / Org Studio
the McKinsey 7-S Framework
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.