Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Workforce planning › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition
Workforce planning for enterprise buyers
Asked as “workforce planning software”, and as “headcount planning tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
Clear leader
43Anaplan24Workday Adaptive Planning06Dayforce27others
43% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026=heldSince October 2026: 43% → 43%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Anaplan held the lead, ±0 points on 43%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
ChartHop15%Contested▼−16Since October 2026: 31% → 15%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop28%Contested▼−9Since October 2026: 37% → 28%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Anaplan43%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 43% → 43%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This page
ChartHop15%Contested▼−16Since October 2026: 31% → 15%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop28%Contested▼−9Since October 2026: 37% → 28%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseAnaplan43%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 43% → 43%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Anaplan43%15%73endorsed leader=heldSince October 2026: 43% → 43%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.43% → 43%
Anaplan43%15%73endorsed leader=heldSince October 2026: 43% → 43%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.43% → 43%02
Workday Adaptive Planning24%11%64accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 29% → 24%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.29% → 24%
Workday Adaptive Planning24%11%64accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 29% → 24%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.29% → 24%03
Pigment6%14%37accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%
Pigment6%14%37accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%04
Dayforce6%9%11accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
Dayforce6%9%11accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%05Visier Workforce Planning4%17%53accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
06ChartHop4%13%31accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%
ChartHop4%13%31accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%07
TeamOhana2%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
TeamOhana2%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM0%29%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM0%29%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
Rippling0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Rippling0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Orgvue0%19%32accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Orgvue0%19%32accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
UKG Pro Workforce Management0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
UKG Pro Workforce Management0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%12%34accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%12%34accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Board0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Board0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Planful0%6%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Planful0%6%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ChartHop vs 4PLAN HRChartHop vs PlanfulChartHop vs Workday Adaptive PlanningChartHop vs ConnecteamPigment vs HomebasePigment vs TeamOhanaPigment vs 4PLAN HRPigment vs PlanfulPigment vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPigment vs ConnecteamHomebase vs TeamOhanaHomebase vs 4PLAN HRHomebase vs PlanfulHomebase vs Workday Adaptive PlanningHomebase vs ConnecteamTeamOhana vs 4PLAN HRTeamOhana vs PlanfulTeamOhana vs Workday Adaptive PlanningTeamOhana vs Connecteam4PLAN HR vs Planful4PLAN HR vs Workday Adaptive Planning4PLAN HR vs ConnecteamPlanful vs Workday Adaptive PlanningPlanful vs ConnecteamWorkday Adaptive Planning vs Connecteam
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304V05
060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Anaplan43%
Anaplan43%02Workday Adaptive Planning24%
Workday Adaptive Planning24%03Pigment6%
Pigment6%04Dayforce6%
Dayforce6%05Visier Workforce Planning4%
06ChartHop4%
ChartHop4%07TeamOhana2%
TeamOhana2%08SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%09Orgvue0%
Orgvue0%10Planful0%
Planful0%11Board0%
Board0%12UKG Pro Workforce Management0%
UKG Pro Workforce Management0%13Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM0%
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM0%14Rippling0%
Rippling0%What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Anaplan15%
11 of 73 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“avoid enterprise options like Anaplan ($50K+/yr) that overkill for your scale” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Visier Workforce Planning
17%
9 of 53 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“You do not want to buy Visier People Essentials as well as Visier Workforce Planning.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning11%
7 of 64 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“if the business case assumes it's all included or automatically native... Get the full license, integration, implementation, and ongoing-administration scope in writing.” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
Orgvue19%
6 of 32 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Require heavy custom build‑out (Anaplan, Pigment, Orgvue) unless you have dedicated modeling resources.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 866 links across 222 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 3 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Disprz33 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G226 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Rework25 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Workday21 answers · 40 citations · 7 models
20 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow20 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · WalkMe17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Anaplan12 answers · 28 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
33 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workforce planning software”, “workforce planning software”, “workforce planning tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaplan anaplan.com | 43% | 154 | 18,100 | 532 | 78,179 | 31 | ||
| Workday parent site Workday Adaptive Planning 24%, Workday Workforce Planning 2% | 27% | 128 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | ||||
| Pigment pigment.com | 6% | 68 | 49,500 | 25,645 | 12,248 | 22 | ||
| Ceridian dayforce.com Dayforce 6% | 6% | 339 | 450,000 | 2,983 | 208,252 | 38 | ||
| Visier Workforce Planning visier.com | 4% | 96 | 40,267 | 16 | ||||
| ChartHop charthop.com | 4% | 380 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | ||
| TeamOhana teamohana.com | 2% | 43 | 320 | 4 | 470 | 4 | ||
| OneStream onestream.com | 2% | 11 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 | |
| Workday workday.com | 2% | 352 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 | 80 | 1 | |
| Adaptive from Workday | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 25 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, workday.com). The first result for “best workforce planning software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workforce planning software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which headcount planning tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade workforce planning tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workforce planning software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a workforce planning software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workforce planning tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AnaplanWorkdayChangedagainst: AnaplanAnaplanAnaplanno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Paylocity, Rippling, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Rippling, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Board, Oracle Workforce Planning, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningGPT-5.4 miniAnaplanAnaplanHeldWorkday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive Planning, Workday Workforce Planningagainst: Anaplan for HR and Workforceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
IBM Planning Analytics, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Anaplan, Board, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics Cloud, Visier Workforce PlanningOne alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCMGemini 3.5 FlashPigmentPigmentHeldAnaplanVisier Workforce Planningno first choiceagainst: 7shifts, BambooHR, Excel, Google Sheets, Gusto, Homebase, Personio
Four alternatives
Anaplan, Orgvue, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Anaplan, TeamOhana, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, SAP SuccessFactors Strategic Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningPerplexity SonarAnaplanagainst: ChartHop, PigmentAnaplanHeldagainst: ChartHopAnaplanChartHopagainst: Visier Workforce Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics, Orgvue, Paylocity
Two alternatives
Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Pigment, TeamOhana, Workday Adaptive PlanningEight alternatives
ChartHop, Gloat, Orgvue, Pigment, Saviom, TeamOhana, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningGrok 4.20AnaplanWorkday Adaptive PlanningChangedVisier Workforce PlanningAnaplanno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday
Three alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Anaplan, ChartHop, Pigment, Rippling, Visier Workforce PlanningFive alternatives
Anaplan, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle HCM Cloud Workforce Planning, Pigment, Planful, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningMistral SmallAnaplan, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningAnaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningChangedWorkday Adaptive PlanningAnaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Agentnoon, Anaplan, Crunchr, Faethm, Oracle's planning tool, Orgvue, Pigment, SAP SuccessFactors' new planning tool, Spreadsheets, Visier Workforce Planning
Three alternatives
Orgvue, Planful, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce PlanningOne alternative
Visier Workforce PlanningNine alternatives
Anaplan, Board, ChartHop, Deel Workforce Planning, Gloat, Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Management, Orgvue, Planful, Visier Workforce PlanningOne alternative
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce PlanningDeepSeek V4 FlashAnaplan, OneStreamAnaplanChangedAnaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningDayforceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCMno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Board, Infor Workforce Management, JDA, Kronos, Nakisa Organization Design, Oracle Fusion HCM Workforce Planning/EPBCS, OrgChart, Orgvue, Pigment, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Analytics, TalentNeuron, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Management, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Board, Orgvue, Pigment, TeamOhana, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Pigment, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce PlanningFour alternatives
Anaplan, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Oracle Strategic Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningLlama 4 MaverickAnaplanno first choiceChangedno first choiceAnaplanno first choiceagainst: Agentnoon, ChartHop, Crunchr, Faethm, Pingboard
Four alternatives
Disprz, Orgvue, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
ChartHop, Pigment, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningQwen 3.7 FlashAnaplanAnaplanHeldno first choiceDayforceno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Dayforce, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, Spreadsheets, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Workday
Four alternatives
ONES.com, Planful, Runn, Visier Workforce PlanningTwo alternatives
Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningSix alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Management, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, WorkdayThree alternatives
Anaplan, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro Workforce ManagementKimi K2Workday Adaptive PlanningPigmentChangedagainst: AnaplanWorkday Adaptive PlanningTeamOhanaagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Excel, Rippling
Three alternatives
Anaplan, Nakisa, Visier Workforce PlanningTwo alternatives
TeamOhana, Workday Adaptive PlanningSeven alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Management, Orgvue, Pigment, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, ChartHop, PigmentGLM 4.7 FlashXWorkday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive PlanningHeldAnaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningChartHopagainst: Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Anaplan, ChartHop, HiBob, Oracle HCM planning tool, Orgvue, Pigment, Planful, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro / Dayforce, Vena, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday
Three alternatives
Anaplan, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM Workforce Planning, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce PlanningTen alternatives
ChartHop, Deel Workforce Planning, Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Management, Orgvue, Planful, Runn, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Vena, Visier Workforce Planning, eResource SchedulerOne alternative
Dayforce Strategic Workforce PlanningMiniMax M2.5Workday Adaptive PlanningWorkday Adaptive PlanningHeldno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCMLimelightagainst: job.rocksWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Excel, Google Sheets
Four alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Workforce Planning, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, VenaOne alternative
TeamOhanaFour alternatives
Anaplan, Factorial, Lattice, PlandayGPT-6 LunaAnaplanAnaplanHeldAnaplanagainst: SAP Analytics CloudAdaptive from Workdayno first choiceagainst: Excel or Google Sheets, Legacy Oracle Hyperion Workforce Planning, SAP Analytics Cloud, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday Workforce Planning
Three alternatives
Orgvue, Pigment, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Orgvue, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Cloud EPM PlanningFive alternatives
Anaplan, Orgvue, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive PlanningMuse Glimmer 30BAnaplanAnaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningChangedWorkday Adaptive PlanningDayforceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Strategic Workforce Planning, Orgvue, Pigment, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Eight alternatives
IBM Planning Analytics, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Orgvue, Pigment, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday Workforce PlanningTwo alternatives
ChartHop, PigmentSeven alternatives
Anaplan, Dayforce Strategic Workforce Planning, Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Planning, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro Strategic Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce PlanningOne alternative
ChartHopBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 10 | 71 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:45 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 10 | 94 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 9 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:15 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 19 | 59 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:51 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:18 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:44 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 21 | 137 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 22 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 21 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:55 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:51 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 10 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:48 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:21 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 6 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:23 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:18 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:40 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 23 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 24 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 22 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 16 | 138 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Dayforce SWP read as Dayforce Strategic Workforce Planning
Deel read as Deel Workforce Planning
HiBob HRIS read as HiBob
IBM read as IBM Planning Analytics
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Fusion HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
SAP SuccessFactors HCM read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
SAP SuccessFactors Human Capital Management read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
UKG read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Visier read as Visier Workforce Planning
Visier People read as Visier Workforce Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Access PeopleXD
Anaplan for HR and Workforce
ChartMogul/Agentic SWP tools
JDA
Legacy Oracle Hyperion Workforce Planning
Limelight
Nakisa Organization Design
Oracle Cloud EPM Planning
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM Workforce Planning
Oracle Fusion Cloud Workforce Planning
Oracle Fusion HCM Workforce Planning/EPBCS
Oracle HCM Cloud Workforce Planning
Oracle HCM planning tool
Oracle's planning tool
Plan
SAP SuccessFactors Strategic Workforce Planning
SAP SuccessFactors' new planning tool
UKG Pro SWP
UKG Pro Strategic Workforce Planning
job.rocks
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.