Workforce planning · November 2026 Edition
Homebase vs TeamOhana
Zero of fourteen models named Homebase first on the direct prompt; one named TeamOhana. Homebase was named by ten of the fourteen models and TeamOhana by nine and Homebase carries 10 labels and TeamOhana 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in twelve categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share11%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 20; printed, not drawn.
Labels1017A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Homebase reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Homebase · ChartHop vs TeamOhana · Pigment vs Homebase
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce planning page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HomebaseFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTeamOhana
Direct01
Paraphrase02
Comparative00
Budget-constrained60
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Homebase and TeamOhana stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | |||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Homebase TeamOhana first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Homebase on the left and TeamOhana on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Homebase and TeamOhana stood in it.
TeamOhana first, Homebase not the choice
1 of 14 modelsHomebase was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop, Pigment, TeamOhana alternatives: Cube, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Runn, Saviom, TeamOhana
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Pigment, Planful, TeamOhana, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2ChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Dayforce, Planful, TeamOhana, UKG Pro Workforce Management
MiniMax M2.5Disprz alternatives: ChartHop, HiBob, Orgvue, Planful, TeamOhana
GPT-6 LunaPigment alternatives: Adaptive from Workday, Planful, TeamOhana
Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5ChartHop, Paylocity alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Rippling, Vena, Visier Workforce Planning
GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Anaplan, HiBob, Rippling
Grok 4.20ChartHop alternatives: Anaplan, Rippling, Visier Workforce Planning
Mistral SmallDisprz alternatives: ChartHop, Orgvue, Planful
Llama 4 MaverickChartHop alternatives: Vena
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Deel Workforce Planning, Monday.com, Planful, Rotageek, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Dayforce, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning
Muse Glimmer 30BChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Centage, Disprz, Orgvue, Planful, Prophix, Vena
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Homebase leads by eleven points.
Homebase11%#4 of 15TeamOhana0%#11 of 15Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: TeamOhana leads at enterprise.
TeamOhana2%#7 of 14Homebase0%#– of 14What the models said about Homebase
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about TeamOhana
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Choose ChartHop or TeamOhana if HR and Recruiting are heavily involved” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with TeamOhana if you want a purpose-built, easy-to-implement solution” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation: TeamOhana” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
ChartHop vs HomebaseChartHop vs TeamOhanaPigment vs HomebasePigment vs TeamOhanaHomebase vs 4PLAN HRHomebase vs PlanfulHomebase vs Workday Adaptive PlanningHomebase vs ConnecteamTeamOhana vs 4PLAN HRTeamOhana vs PlanfulTeamOhana vs Workday Adaptive PlanningTeamOhana vs ConnecteamAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full workforce planning standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.