Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Workforce planning › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Workforce planning for small business buyers

Asked as “workforce planning software”, and as “headcount planning tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
15%
Contested · Rippling 15%
15ChartHop15Rippling13BambooHR58others

15% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▼−16Since October 2026: 31% → 15%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.ChartHop held the lead, −16 points on 31%, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ChartHop15%9%34accepted challenger▼−16Since October 2026: 31% → 15%, −16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.31% → 15%
02Rippling15%15%40accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 8% → 15%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 15%
03BambooHR13%6%33accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 6% → 13%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 13%
04Homebase11%3%38accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 20% → 11%, −9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.20% → 11%
05Connecteam11%0%28accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 11%
06When I Work4%5%21accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
07Float4%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
08Runn2%6%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
09Deputy2%12%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
10HiBob2%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%92%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Visier Workforce Planning0%88%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14Workday Adaptive Planning0%85%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
15Anaplan0%83%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11TeamOhana0%8%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
V13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01ChartHop15%
02Rippling15%
03BambooHR13%
04Homebase11%
05Connecteam11%
06When I Work4%
07Float4%
08Runn2%
09Deputy2%
10HiBob2%
11TeamOhana0%
12SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning0%
13Visier Workforce Planning0%
14Workday Adaptive Planning0%
15Anaplan0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday Adaptive Planning
85%
17 of 20 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“Tools designed for large enterprises (e.g., Workday Adaptive Planning, Oracle Workforce Planning) often come with high costs, steep learning curves” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Anaplan
83%
25 of 30 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 13 hard negative
“Enterprise-Level FP&A and Analytics Platforms (e.g., Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, Visier, Oracle Workforce Planning, SAP SuccessFactors) - Why avoid or be cautious?” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Visier Workforce Planning
88%
15 of 17 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“❌ Enterprise-only tools (Anaplan, Visier, Orgvue) built for thousands of employees — overkill and overpriced for 30 people.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, scale prompt
SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
92%
12 of 13 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Enterprise-Level FP&A and Analytics Platforms (e.g., ... SAP SuccessFactors) - Why avoid or be cautious?” Grok 4.20, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 785 links across 213 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 3 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Rework28 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G227 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · WalkMe24 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · FirstHR22 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Disprz16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Rippling13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow12 answers · 14 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workforce planning software”, “workforce planning software”, “workforce planning tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
ChartHop charthop.com15%3802,900166,2380
Rippling rippling.com15%1438301,00017,886712,399$42,0131156
BambooHR bamboohr.com13%107490,5005511,055,247$44,698106
Homebase joinhomebase.com11%353201,0003,839472,253$793120
Connecteam connecteam.com11%69349,500288312,449$13,504120
Lative lative.ai5%6
When I Work wheniwork.com4%267110,0005,608218,244$2034
Float float.com4%1760,500177,38738,65912
Desklog desklog.io4%35
Runn runn.io2%29246,00047129,37121

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 25 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, peoplemanagingpeople.com, rippling.com). The first result for “best workforce planning software” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best workforce planning software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which headcount planning tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top workforce planning tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workforce planning software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a workforce planning software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workforce planning tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BambooHR, Homebase
Two alternativesChartHop, Paylocity
no first choiceChangedHomebase
Three alternativesBambooHR, ClickUp, Paymo
against: Excel/Google Sheets, Workday
Connecteam
Three alternativesBambooHR, Homebase, Humanity
no first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Board, ERPNext, Workday
GPT-5.4 miniRippling
Two alternativesHiBob, Pigment
against: Anaplan
RipplingHeld
Two alternativesBuilt, HiBob
against: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning
Connecteam, Homebase
Five alternativesHiBob, Pigment, Rippling, When I Work, Workday Adaptive Planning
against: Anaplan
Homebase
One alternativeBambooHR
against: Rippling
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashFloat
Six alternativesAgentnoon, ChartHop, Monday.com, Mosaic, Resource Guru, Runn
ChartHopChanged
Five alternativesCausal, Cube, Google Sheets / Excel, Jirav, Runway
against: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning
Float, Runn
Six alternativesChartHop, ClickUp, Deputy, Homebase, Monday.com, Resource Guru
against: Anaplan, Workday
Connecteam, Google Sheets
Five alternativesChartHop, Clockify, Homebase, Sling, When I Work
against: Anaplan, Pigment
no first choice
Thirteen alternatives7shifts, Agentnoon, BambooHR, Causal, ChartHop, Connecteam, Cube, Homebase, Mosaic, Personio, Rippling, Runway, TeamOhana
against: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning
against: Anaplan, Excel, Google Sheets, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday, Workday Adaptive Planning
Perplexity SonarMonday.com
Five alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Deel HR, Productive, Runn
against: Anaplan, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
LativeChanged
One alternativeChartHop
Homebase, When I Work
Six alternativesBambooHR, ChartHop, Connecteam, Float, Rippling, Runn
against: Anaplan, Pigment, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Resource Guru
Four alternativesBambooHR, Connecteam, Float, Homebase
against: Anaplan, Runn, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday
no first choiceagainst: Anaplan, ChartHop, Pigment, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Grok 4.20BambooHR
Four alternativesAgentnoon, ChartHop, Homebase, Rippling
against: Anaplan, Orgvue, Workday Adaptive Planning
ChartHopChanged
Three alternativesRippling, Runn, TeamOhana
against: Anaplan, Pigment, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday, Workday Adaptive Planning
ClickUp, Productive
Four alternativesBambooHR, Planday, Rippling, Runn
against: Anaplan, ChartHop, Hubstaff, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday
Homebase
Two alternativesBitrix24, Zoho People
BambooHR, Paylocity, Personio
Two alternativesHubstaff, Workday Adaptive Planning
against: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
against: Anaplan, ChartHop, Nakisa, Oracle Workforce Planning, Orgvue, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Mistral SmallHiBob, Rippling
Three alternativesChartHop, Connecteam, Leapsome
LativeChanged
Three alternativesChartHop, Rippling, Runn
Rippling
Nine alternativesAgentnoon, BambooHR, ChartHop, Connecteam, Employment Hero, Homebase, Paymo, When I Work, Zoho People
ChartHop
Four alternativesConnecteam, Deputy, Monday.com, TeamOhana
no first choiceagainst: Workdayagainst: Oracle Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
DeepSeek V4 FlashBambooHR, Rippling
Four alternativesConnecteam, HiBob, Homebase, Paymo
RipplingChanged
Two alternativesCausal, ChartHop
against: Anaplan, Planful
Paymo, Runn
Five alternativesAgentnoon, ChartHop, Connecteam, Deputy, When I Work
Connecteam
Three alternativesHomebase, When I Work, Zoho People
against: BambooHR, Deputy
BambooHR, Rippling
One alternativeChartHop
against: Anaplan, Orgvue, Visier Workforce Planning
against: Anaplan, Dayforce, Eightfold AI, One Model, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Orgvue, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro Workforce Management, UKG Ready, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Agentnoon, Pingboard
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop
Four alternativesConnecteam, Homebase, Rippling, TeamOhana
ChartHopHeld
One alternativeRippling
against: Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
Float, Runn
Four alternativesBambooHR, ChartHop, Homebase, Planday
against: Google Sheets / Excel
Connecteam
Four alternativesChartHop, Homebase, When I Work, Zoho People
against: Deputy, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro Workforce Management
no first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planningagainst: Homebase, Oracle Financials, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning, When I Work, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2Float, Runn
Three alternativesBambooHR, Connecteam, Rippling
ChartHopChanged
Two alternativesBambooHR, TeamOhana
Homebase
Four alternatives7shifts, BambooHR, ChartHop, When I Work
Connecteam, SuperSaaS
Three alternativesHomebase, When I Work, Zoho People
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Orgvue, Paychex, Paycor, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
GLM 4.7 FlashXBambooHR, Rippling
Five alternativesConnecteam, Deputy, Homebase, When I Work, Zoho People
LativeChanged
Three alternativesCube FP&A, Forecastio, Rippling
Homebase
Four alternativesBambooHR, ChartHop, Quinyx, Rippling
against: Paylocity
Connecteam, Homebase
Two alternativesWhen I Work, Zoho People
no first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Board, GFOS, IBM Planning Analytics, Planful, Quinyx, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
MiniMax M2.5BambooHR, Paymo
Two alternativesHomebase, Rippling
RipplingChanged
Three alternativesMangoApps' Headcount Planner, TeamOhana, Tiny Tool Calculator
Connecteam
Four alternativesBambooHR, Deel Workforce Planning, Homebase, Runn
against: Quinyx
Desklog, When I Work
One alternativeHomebase
no first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Human Capital Management, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
GPT-6 LunaJirav
One alternativeFloat
ChartHopChanged
One alternativeRippling
Resource Guru
Four alternativesAsana, Float, Runn, Toggl
Homebase
Two alternativesSling, When I Work
no first choiceagainst: TeamOhananothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BDeputy, Homebase
Eight alternativesBambooHR, Connecteam, Employment Hero, HiBob, Paymo, Rippling, Runn, When I Work
ChartHopChanged
Two alternativesLative, TeamOhana
Monday.com, Runn
Nine alternativesAgentnoon, BambooHR, Connecteam, Deel HR, Homebase, Planday, Rippling, Shifts, When I Work
Desklog, When I Work
Three alternativesDeputy, Homebase, TimeplanGo
against: BambooHR, factoHR
no first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Nakisa, Oracle Workforce Management Cloud, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning, WorkForce Software, Workday Adaptive Planning
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:44yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:32yes34 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:04yes1021 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:46yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:20yes937 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:25yes56 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:41yes2427 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:19yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:06yes531 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:15yes1422 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:36yes1535 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:47yes639 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:27yes316 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:48yes1222 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:44no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:24yes25 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:04no016 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:49yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:28yes526 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:57yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:36yes2223 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:23yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:14yes538 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:21yes1821 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:45yes2137 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:48yes518 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:45yes212 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:12yes1317 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:32yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:05yes210 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:46yes1223 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:18yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:19yes534 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:25yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:42yes1934 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:56yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:33yes519 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:55yes1531 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:28yes2540 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:11yes1535 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:58yes624 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:40yes1228 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:54yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:22yes38 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:43yes720 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:25yes105 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:10yes1024 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:34yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:57yes1917 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:40yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:45yes1022 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:15yes820 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:54yes2243 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:01yes516 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:17yes314 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:14yes1222 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:40no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:51no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:24yes1022 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:17yes105 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:04yes1539 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:31no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:00yes2426 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:56yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:44no031 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:59yes1029 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:48yes1540 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:52yes1535 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:50yes218 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:21no05 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:53yes97 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:24no04 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:18yes921 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:47yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:07yes523 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:13yes57 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:53yes2228 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:05yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:38yes1946 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:40yes2227 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:27yes2268 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:36yes1464 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:51yes612 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:25yes1525 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
ADP read as ADP Workforce Now
Deel read as Deel Workforce Planning
HiBob HRIS read as HiBob
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning
UKG read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG (Ultimate Kronos Group) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
UKG Pro (Kronos) read as UKG Pro Workforce Management
Visier read as Visier Workforce Planning
Visier People read as Visier Workforce Planning
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
monday AI Workspace read as Monday.com
Unresolved, counted raw
Firstbase's Headcount Planning Calculator
GFOS
Oracle Financials
Oracle Human Capital Management
Oracle Workforce Management Cloud
Parallel's Headcount Planning for Startups
Procured
Rippling's Headcount Planning Software
Tiny Tool Calculator
Tiny Tool's Headcount Planning Calculator
Toggl
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← People analyticsBenefits administration →