The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
ChartHop is first at 15%.
ChartHop is first at 28%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Anaplan is first at 43%.
“Excellent for strategic planning; robust reporting... Ratings: 4.5/5 (strong in analytics depth).”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“Best for: Organizations needing people analytics and workforce insights layered on top of existing HRIS data.”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · alternative
“Best For: Large organizations looking for out-of-the-box workforce analytics and strategic talent planning.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“For analytics-focused organizations: Visier People provides superior workforce intelligence”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · alternative
“Avoid enterprise platforms such as Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, or Visier”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“What to avoid - Enterprise-only suites (Visier, Crunchr, Faethm, Orgvue)”Kimi K2 · Direct question · warning
“specifically mentioned as tools to skip”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Skip Crunchr, Faethm and Visier”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Visier Workforce Planning, over the 105 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 93 | 20 | View → | |
| 84 | 17 | View → | |
| 62 | 13 | View → | |
| 51 | 0 | View → | |
| 46 | 0 | View → | |
| 45 | 2 | View → | |
| 31 | 2 | View → | |
| 30 | 0 | View → | |
| 28 | 0 | View → | |
| 21 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Visier Workforce Planning →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 96 of the 105 answers that named Visier Workforce Planning and are not a share of its labels.
328 of the 328 domain citations in answers naming Visier Workforce Planning came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 804 | 20 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| News or press | 247 | undated | |||
| Case study | 46 | 0 | 2022-10-04 | ||
| Conference or event | 23 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 22 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2025-03-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 0 | 2024-01-31 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2020-04-16 |
As the event pages on visier.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page visier.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.