Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › People analytics › Small business · November 2026 Edition
People analytics for small business buyers
Asked as “people analytics platform”, and as “HR analytics software”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46BambooHR09Rippling07TalentHR38others
46% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−7Since October 2026: 53% → 46%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.BambooHR held the lead, −7 points on 53%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
BambooHR46%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 53% → 46%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
ChartHop23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ChartHop (23%) replaces Crunchr (22% then, 18% now), 5 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
Visier65%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 57% → 65%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
BambooHR46%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 53% → 46%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketChartHop23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ChartHop (23%) replaces Crunchr (22% then, 18% now), 5 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseVisier65%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 57% → 65%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01BambooHR46%3%68endorsed leader▼−7Since October 2026: 53% → 46%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.53% → 46%
BambooHR46%3%68endorsed leader▼−7Since October 2026: 53% → 46%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.53% → 46%02
Rippling9%7%42accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%
Rippling9%7%42accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%03
TalentHR7%0%16accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 7%
TalentHR7%0%16accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 7%04ChartHop4%13%38accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
ChartHop4%13%38accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%05
Gusto4%10%20accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Gusto4%10%20accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%06
HiBob4%11%19accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%
HiBob4%11%19accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%07
Leapsome2%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Leapsome2%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%08
ThriveSparrow2%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
ThriveSparrow2%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09
Zoho People2%0%13accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
Zoho People2%0%13accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%10
Personio2%0%10accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
Personio2%0%10accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%11
Crunchr2%56%16criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Crunchr2%56%16criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16
Workday People Analytics0%95%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday People Analytics0%95%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%17Visier0%88%40criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Visier0%88%40criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15
One Model0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
One Model0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Culture Amp0%25%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Culture Amp0%25%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14Microsoft Power BI0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12
Lattice0%9%33accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
Lattice0%9%33accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
ChartHop vs BambooHRChartHop vs LeapsomeChartHop vs RipplingCrunchr vs HiBobCrunchr vs VisierCrunchr vs BambooHRCrunchr vs LeapsomeCrunchr vs RipplingHiBob vs VisierHiBob vs BambooHRHiBob vs LeapsomeHiBob vs RipplingVisier vs BambooHRVisier vs LeapsomeVisier vs RipplingBambooHR vs LeapsomeBambooHR vs RipplingLeapsome vs Rippling
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213M14
151617Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01BambooHR46%
BambooHR46%02Rippling9%
Rippling9%03TalentHR7%
TalentHR7%04ChartHop4%
ChartHop4%05Gusto4%
Gusto4%06HiBob4%
HiBob4%07Leapsome2%
Leapsome2%08ThriveSparrow2%
ThriveSparrow2%09Zoho People2%
Zoho People2%10Personio2%
Personio2%11Crunchr2%
Crunchr2%12Lattice0%
Lattice0%13Culture Amp0%
Culture Amp0%14Microsoft Power BI0%
15One Model0%
One Model0%16Workday People Analytics0%
Workday People Analytics0%17Visier0%
Visier0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Visier88%
35 of 40 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 22 hard negative
“Often enterprise-oriented with pricing that starts around $1/user/month but scales quickly into high annual commitments... Small business users report it's overkill” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Workday People Analytics95%
19 of 20 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 15 hard negative
“platforms a small business should avoid or be extremely cautious about… Workday People Analytics… not designed as a standalone 'people analytics' platform for small teams” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
One Model76%
13 of 17 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Enterprise People Analytics *(Avoid for now)* | Visier, One Model, Crunchr | Not recommended at 30 seats.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Crunchr56%
9 of 16 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“What I'd Avoid ... Visier, Crunchr, or Qualtrics ... likely overkill and over-budget for a small business.” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 803 links across 180 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 16 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · ThriveSparrow31 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
19 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G218 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Workhuman16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · HiBob14 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Thrivea14 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · HRBench14 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
31 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 8 models
23 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best people analytics platform”, “people analytics platform”, “people analytics platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BambooHR bamboohr.com | 46% | 1074 | 90,500 | 551 | 1,055,247 | $44,698 | 106 |
| Rippling rippling.com | 9% | 1438 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 |
| TalentHR talenthr.io | 7% | 89 | 480 | 1 | 89,831 | 32 | |
| ChartHop charthop.com | 4% | 380 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | |
| Gusto gusto.com | 4% | 742 | 673,000 | 10,560 | 1,629,483 | 118 | |
| HiBob hibob.com | 4% | 354 | 14,800 | 154 | 266,143 | $54 | 120 |
| Thrivea thrivea.com | 4% | 14 | 70 | 0 | 1,147 | ||
| Zoho parent site Zoho People 2%, Zoho Analytics 2% | 4% | 309 | 6,600 | 50 | |||
| Leapsome leapsome.com | 2% | 378 | 2,900 | 32 | 51,450 | $18,531 | 60 |
| ThriveSparrow thrivesparrow.com | 2% | 63 | 110 | 1 | 24,978 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best people analytics platform” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best people analytics platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which HR analytics software would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top people analytics platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best people analytics platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a people analytics platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which people analytics platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BambooHRBambooHR, Paylocity AnalyticsChangedBambooHRFactorial, PeopleHumno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Eletive, One Model, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors, Visier, Workday People Analytics
Three alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, Talenteo, ThriveSparrowTwo alternatives
Gusto, RipplingThree alternatives
HiBob, Lattice, PersonioOne alternative
BambooHRGPT-5.4 miniRipplingRipplingHeldagainst: ADP Workforce NowBambooHR, Latticeagainst: VisierBambooHR, Google Sheets, Zoho Peopleno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
BambooHR, Microsoft Power BITwo alternatives
BambooHR, HiBobThree alternatives
ChartHop, HiBob, One ModelThree alternatives
ChartHop, HiBob, Looker StudioGemini 3.5 FlashChartHopagainst: One Model, VisierRipplingChangedRipplingagainst: One Model, VisierGustoagainst: One Model, VisierBambooHR, ChartHop, HiBob, Ripplingagainst: Crunchr, One Model, Visieragainst: Looker, Microsoft Power BI, One Model, Oracle Fusion Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Tableau, Visier, Workday People Analytics, Workday Prism Analytics
Five alternatives
Culture Amp, HiBob, Knoetic, Lattice, RipplingFour alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, HiBob, LatticeSix alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, HiBob, Illoominus, Lattice, LeapsomeSix alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Rippling, Zoho PeopleTwo alternatives
Culture Amp, LatticePerplexity SonarBambooHRagainst: Visier, Workday People AnalyticsBambooHRHeldagainst: Visier, Workday People AnalyticsBambooHRagainst: Crunchr, VisierBambooHRagainst: ChartHop, Ripplingno first choiceagainst: Crunchr, One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, SAP SuccessFactors, Teramind, UKG Pro, Visier, Workday People Analytics
Two alternatives
Lattice, RipplingFour alternatives
ChartHop, Lattice, Rippling, ThriveaFive alternatives
ChartHop, Lattice, PeopleInsight, Rippling, ThriveSparrowOne alternative
ThriveaGrok 4.20BambooHRBambooHR, RipplingChangedagainst: Microsoft Power BI, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Ready, Visier, Zoho AnalyticsBambooHR, ChartHopagainst: Tableau, Visier, Workday People AnalyticsThriveaagainst: Culture Amp, HiBob, Visier, Workday People AnalyticsBambooHRagainst: Visier, Workday People Analyticsagainst: ChartHop, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, Visier, Workday People Analytics
Five alternatives
ChartHop, Primalogik, Rippling, TalentHR, ThriveaThree alternatives
ChartHop, Gusto, IntelliHRFive alternatives
Culture Amp, Gusto, IntelliHR, Lattice, RipplingTwo alternatives
BambooHR, Google SheetsSeven alternatives
Factorial, HiBob, Leapsome, Rippling, Sage HR, ThriveSparrow, ThriveaMistral SmallBambooHRBambooHR, Deel HRChangedBambooHR, ThriveSparrowTalentHRno first choiceagainst: Eletive, One Model, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Visier, Workday People Analytics, Workday Prism Analytics
Two alternatives
ChartHop, TalentHRThree alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, Rippling, ZimyoThree alternatives
HiBob, Rippling, TableauFour alternatives
BambooHR, Culture Amp, Leapsome, PersonioDeepSeek V4 FlashBambooHRGustoChangedBambooHR, Ripplingagainst: VisierLeapsomeagainst: BambooHR, ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, Visier, Workday People AnalyticsBambooHR, HiBob, Personioagainst: One Model, Visieragainst: IBM Planning Analytics, One Model, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Visier, Workday People Analytics
Four alternatives
ChartHop, Leapsome, Rippling, TalentHRTwo alternatives
BambooHR, RipplingFive alternatives
ChartHop, Culture Amp, HiBob, Lattice, LeapsomeThree alternatives
15Five, Deel HR, Zoho PeopleLlama 4 MaverickBambooHRno first choiceChangedno first choiceTalentHRno first choiceagainst: Crunchr, Eletive, Lattice, Visier, Workday Prism Analytics
Four alternatives
Justworks, Personio, TalentHR, ThriveSparrowThree alternatives
BambooHR, Primalogik, Zoho PeopleQwen 3.7 FlashBambooHRagainst: VisierCharted.ioChangedLattice, Ripplingagainst: Gusto, Visier, Workday People AnalyticsAirtableagainst: Microsoft Viva Glint, Visierno first choiceagainst: Excel, SAP, Tableau, Workday People Analyticsagainst: Culture Amp, Eletive, Lattice, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, One Model, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Tableau, Visier, Workday Adaptive Planning, Workday People Analytics
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Lattice, TalentHRThree alternatives
Lattice, Microsoft Power BI, TrakstarTwo alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHopFive alternatives
BambooHR, Excel, Google Sheets, Microsoft Power BI, Monday.comFive alternatives
Deel HR, Pave, Rippling, Trincro, VisierKimi K2BambooHRBambooHRHeldagainst: Crunchr, Gusto, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, VisierBambooHR, Gustoagainst: Culture Amp, RipplingTalentHRno first choiceagainst: ChartHop, Crunchr, Lattice People Analytics, One Model, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics Modules, Visier, Workday People Analytics
Two alternatives
15Five, LatticeTwo alternatives
Rippling, Zoho PeopleTwo alternatives
ChartHop, LatticeThree alternatives
DreamTeam, Google Sheets, Zoho PeopleGLM 4.7 FlashXThriveSparrowBambooHRChangedBambooHR, ChartHopagainst: VisierTalentHRagainst: Culture Amp, HiBob, Visierno first choiceagainst: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday People Analyticsagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Access PeopleHR, Crunchr, Eletive, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors HCM, Visier, Workhuman iQ
Four alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, Lattice, RipplingThree alternatives
Gusto, Rippling, Zoho PeopleThree alternatives
Culture Amp, Lattice, RipplingFour alternatives
BambooHR, Rippling, Thrivea, Zoho PeopleMiniMax M2.5BambooHR, Crunchragainst: VisierBambooHRChangedno first choiceBambooHRagainst: Latticeno first choiceagainst: ADP TotalSource, Factorial, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors, Visier, Workday People Analytics
Two alternatives
Culture Amp, LatticeThree alternatives
Gusto, HR Cloud, RipplingThree alternatives
ActivTrak, Google Forms + Looker Studio, GustoGPT-6 LunaBambooHRBambooHRHeldBambooHR, RipplingZoho Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Hubstaff, Teramind, Time Doctor
One alternative
ChartHopTwo alternatives
Gusto, RipplingThree alternatives
ChartHop, HiBob, LatticeOne alternative
Zoho PeopleMuse Glimmer 30BBambooHRBambooHRHeldTalentHRagainst: VisierThriveano first choiceagainst: ChartHop, Crunchr, Eletive, One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP, Visier, Workday People Analytics
Three alternatives
ChartHop, TalentHR, ThriveSparrowTwo alternatives
TalentHR, Zoho PeopleFive alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, IntelliHR, Primalogik, ZimyoFour alternatives
BambooHR, Engagedly, TalentHR, ThriveSparrowThree alternatives
BambooHR, Leapsome, ThriveSparrowBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:59 | yes | 10 | 51 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 11 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:48 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:43 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 13 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:25 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 8 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 23 | 72 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:20 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:06 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 23 | 71 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:55 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:49 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:51 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:00 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:43 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:44 | no | 0 | 57 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:51 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:54 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:04 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 24 | 74 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 24 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Deel read as Deel HR
Glint read as Microsoft Viva Glint
Lever read as LeverTRM
Lever (Trestle) read as LeverTRM
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud (People Analytics) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Power BI read as Microsoft Power BI
Qualtrics read as Qualtrics EmployeeXM
Workday read as Workday People Analytics
Workhuman read as Workhuman iQ
Unresolved, counted raw
BalancedComp
Charted.io
DIY with Google Sheets/Looker
Factorial or Sage HR
Lattice People Analytics
Microsoft Excel + Power BI
Oracle Fusion Analytics
Oracle Human Resources Analytics
SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics Modules
Trincro
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.