Workday People Analytics monitors workforce data to surface hidden trends, risks and opportunities, and ranks these insights by importance, highlighting where to act and the root causes · workday.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
ActivTrak is first at 39%.
ActivTrak is first at 47%.
Teramind is first at 27%.
“Its main appeal is a closer fit with the Workday environment—not necessarily being the most flexible choice for a mixed-system data estate.”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · alternative
“Native or built-in analytics (like those in Workday or HiBob) are often a better fit until your data infrastructure is more mature.”Mistral Small · Negative question · alternative
“If you use a single vendor for everything (e.g., total Workday shop), Workday People Analytics might be sufficient.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Ideal For: Organizations fully committed to Workday seeking embedded analytics without additional integrations.”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · alternative
“Visier / Workday are powerful for strategic workforce planning but are typically overkill and over-budget for mid-sized companies”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · warning
“Avoid Visier, Workday, or other enterprise platforms”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“treat AI hiring or screening tools—including Workday’s screening tools—as a heightened due-diligence area. Workday is facing ongoing litigation alleging discriminatory effects”GPT-6 Luna · Negative question · warning
“it has been scrutinized for opaque AI/ML models in its analytics tools, with concerns about bias and lack of explainability”MiniMax M2.5 · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Workday People Analytics, over the 113 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 105 | 52 | View → | |
| 56 | 8 | View → | |
| 56 | 5 | View → | |
| 51 | 4 | View → | |
| 33 | 0 | View → | |
| 31 | 7 | View → | |
| 27 | 0 | View → | |
| 22 | 0 | View → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → | |
| 19 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Workday People Analytics →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Workday People Analytics's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 106 of the 113 answers that named Workday People Analytics and are not a share of its labels.
234 of the 234 domain citations in answers naming Workday People Analytics came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |