People analytics
Asked as “people analytics platform”, and as “HR analytics software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
23%
Contested · Crunchr 18%
23ChartHop18Crunchr12HiBob46others
23% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ChartHop (23%) replaces Crunchr (22% then, 18% now), 5 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.ChartHop leads at 23%, replacing Crunchr, which led at 22% and stands at 18% now: 5 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
BambooHR46%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 53% → 46%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
ChartHop23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ChartHop (23%) replaces Crunchr (22% then, 18% now), 5 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageEnterprise
Visier65%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 57% → 65%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
BambooHR46%Clear leader▼−7Since October 2026: 53% → 46%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketChartHop23%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ChartHop (23%) replaces Crunchr (22% then, 18% now), 5 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageEnterpriseVisier65%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 57% → 65%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ChartHop23%2%45accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 21% → 23%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.21% → 23%
ChartHop23%2%45accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 21% → 23%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.21% → 23%02
Crunchr18%8%39accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 22% → 18%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 18%
Crunchr18%8%39accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 22% → 18%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 18%03
HiBob12%0%28accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.19% → 12%
HiBob12%0%28accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 19% → 12%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.19% → 12%04Visier9%36%47criticized challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 0% → 9%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 9%
Visier9%36%47criticized challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 0% → 9%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 9%05BambooHR5%6%31accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 9% → 5%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 5%
BambooHR5%6%31accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 9% → 5%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 5%06
Leapsome4%7%15accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Leapsome4%7%15accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%07
Rippling4%6%16accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%
Rippling4%6%16accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 3% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 4%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
SAP SuccessFactors0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SAP SuccessFactors0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Tableau0%33%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Tableau0%33%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Workday People Analytics0%29%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday People Analytics0%29%28criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
One Model0%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
One Model0%14%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Culture Amp0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Culture Amp0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Lattice0%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Lattice0%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
ChartHop vs BambooHRChartHop vs LeapsomeChartHop vs RipplingCrunchr vs HiBobCrunchr vs VisierCrunchr vs BambooHRCrunchr vs LeapsomeCrunchr vs RipplingHiBob vs VisierHiBob vs BambooHRHiBob vs LeapsomeHiBob vs RipplingVisier vs BambooHRVisier vs LeapsomeVisier vs RipplingBambooHR vs LeapsomeBambooHR vs RipplingLeapsome vs Rippling
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01ChartHop23%
ChartHop23%02Crunchr18%
Crunchr18%03HiBob12%
HiBob12%04Visier9%
Visier9%05BambooHR5%
BambooHR5%06Leapsome4%
Leapsome4%07Rippling4%
Rippling4%08Culture Amp0%
Culture Amp0%09Lattice0%
Lattice0%10One Model0%
One Model0%11Workday People Analytics0%
Workday People Analytics0%12Tableau0%
Tableau0%13SAP SuccessFactors0%
SAP SuccessFactors0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Visier36%
17 of 47 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Options to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Visier and Crunchr (enterprise tier)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Workday People Analytics29%
8 of 28 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid Visier, Workday, or other enterprise platforms” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
SAP SuccessFactors64%
7 of 11 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-heavy tools (e.g., full SAP SuccessFactors) unless you plan rapid growth—they can be overkill and expensive.” Grok 4.20, scale prompt
ActivTrak75%
3 of 4 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“keystroke logging and screenshot capture tools ... several have faced legal challenges in the EU under GDPR” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 775 links across 221 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 16 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G219 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ThriveSparrow19 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
18 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Leapsome18 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · HiBob16 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Rework14 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 6 models
vendor site · ChartHop13 answers · 17 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 20 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
19 answers · 7 models
18 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best people analytics platform”, “people analytics platform”, “people analytics platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChartHop charthop.com | 23% | 380 | 2,900 | 16 | 6,238 | 0 | ||
| Crunchr crunchr.com | 18% | 107 | 390 | 3 | 1,411 | 1 | 7 | |
| HiBob hibob.com | 12% | 354 | 14,800 | 154 | 266,143 | $54 | 120 | |
| Visier visier.com | 9% | 192 | 2,400 | 72 | 40,267 | 16 | ||
| BambooHR bamboohr.com | 5% | 1074 | 90,500 | 551 | 1,055,247 | $44,698 | 106 | |
| Leapsome leapsome.com | 4% | 378 | 2,900 | 32 | 51,450 | $18,531 | 60 | |
| Rippling rippling.com | 4% | 1438 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 | |
| TalentHR talenthr.io | 4% | 89 | 480 | 1 | 89,831 | 32 | ||
| Factorial factorialhr.com | 4% | 124 | 27,100 | 304,748 | 141,409 | 1 | ||
| Google Sheets google.com | 2% | 62 | 3,350,000 | 53,730 | 1,800,358,416 | $465,944 | 5 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 14 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (peoplemanagingpeople.com). The first result for “best people analytics platform” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best people analytics platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which HR analytics software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top people analytics platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best people analytics platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a people analytics platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which people analytics platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PeoplePilotagainst: VisierHiBobChangedVisierFactorialno first choiceagainst: Amazon's hiring tool, Visier, Worksmart
Four alternatives
Crunchr, HiBob People Analytics, Lattice, OrgnosticThree alternatives
BambooHR, Paycor, PeoplePilotFive alternatives
ChartHop, Culture Amp, One Model, Workday People Analytics, WorklyticsFour alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, Crunchr, LeapsomeGPT-5.4 miniHiBobHiBob, RipplingChangedVisierPeopleForceno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Crunchr, Orgvue, PerceptyxOne alternative
ADP Workforce NowSeven alternatives
ChartHop, Culture Amp, Microsoft Viva Glint, Microsoft Viva Insights, Orgvue, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People Analytics / Prism AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Rippling, Zoho PeopleGemini 3.5 FlashChartHop, VisierChartHop, VisierHeldVisierChartHopagainst: Culture Amp, One Model, Perceptyx, Visier, Workday Peakonno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
HiBob, Lattice, Leapsome, RipplingThree alternatives
Lattice, Leapsome, RipplingSix alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, One Model, Workday Peakon, Workday People AnalyticsSix alternatives
BambooHR, Effy AI, Leapsome, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, RipplingPerplexity SonarCrunchragainst: Visier, Workday People AnalyticsChartHop, CrunchrChangedagainst: VisierVisierFactorialagainst: ChartHop, Lattice, Visier, Workday People Analyticsno first choiceagainst: Crunchr, Culture Amp, Lattice, Leapsome, One Model, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, SAP SuccessFactors, Visier
Three alternatives
ChartHop, Culture Amp, LatticeThree alternatives
Culture Amp, HiBob, LatticeTen alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, HiBob, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Glint, One Model, Tableau, Workday People AnalyticsTwo alternatives
BambooHR, ThriveaGrok 4.20ChartHopagainst: VisierVisierChangedagainst: ADP Workforce Now, DreamTeam, TableauVisierThriveaagainst: Crunchr, VisierVisieragainst: Microsoft Power BI, SAP SuccessFactors, Tableau, Workday Prism Analyticsagainst: ADP, ActivTrak, Aon, Bossware, Fama, HireVue, Humanyze, Teramind, Visier, Workday People Analytics
Two alternatives
HiBob, LatticeThree alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, HiBobFour alternatives
Crunchr, One Model, Panalyt, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
BambooHR, DreamTeam, Google SheetsTwo alternatives
ADP Workforce Analytics, BambooHRMistral SmallChartHop, CrunchrCrunchr People Analytics, HiBobChangedVisierTalentHRno first choicenothing named
One alternative
HiBobTwo alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, ChartHopEight alternatives
15Five, Culture Amp, HiBob, Leapsome, MentorcliQ, Tableau, UKG Pro, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
ActivTrak, BambooHR, Google SheetsDeepSeek V4 FlashChartHopChartHopHeldagainst: VisierVisierTalentHRagainst: Crunchr, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors, Visierno first choiceagainst: Visieragainst: ADP Workforce Now, ActivTrak, BambooHR, Crystal, Humantic AI, Humanyze, JazzHR, Teramind, Textio, Time Doctor, WorkForce Software, Workday People Analytics, Workpuls
Four alternatives
Crunchr, Culture Amp, HiBob, One ModelThree alternatives
BambooHR, Crunchr, HiBobEight alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, Lattice, One Model, Qualtrics People Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsTwo alternatives
ChartHop, EngagedlyFive alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, Lattice, One ModelLlama 4 MaverickHiBobno first choiceChangedno first choiceClaude, Google Sheetsno first choicenothing named
Six alternatives
15Five, BambooHR, ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, RipplingThree alternatives
FeedbackPulse, Lattice, LeapsomeQwen 3.7 FlashHiBobagainst: VisierSynergy, VisierChangedagainst: SAP SuccessFactorsChartHop, One Model, VisierLeapsomeagainst: Culture Ampno first choiceagainst: SAP SuccessFactorsagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Jibble, One Model, PeopleGoal, SAP SuccessFactors, Tableau, Zoho People
Two alternatives
ChartHop, CrunchrFour alternatives
LHH, Microsoft Power BI, OneScore, TableauSix alternatives
Crunchr, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors, Tableau, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
15Five, FeedbackPulse, TalentHRKimi K2ChartHop, CrunchrBambooHR, CrunchrChangedagainst: Visier, Workday People AnalyticsVisierPeopleInsightCrunchragainst: ADP, Humanyze, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday People Analytics
Two alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, HiBobFive alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, Eightfold AI, Qualtrics EmployeeXM, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
ChartHop, Talenteo, WorklyticsFour alternatives
ChartHop, Culture Amp, HiBob, LatticeGLM 4.7 FlashXCrunchrChartHopChangedVisierLeapsomeno first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Lattice, Rippling, greytHR
Two alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHopFour alternatives
BambooHR, Crunchr, Rippling, VisierNine alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, HiBob, Lattice, Orgvue, Qualtrics People Analytics, TableauTwo alternatives
Google Sheets + Looker Studio, PeopleInsightMiniMax M2.5CrunchrHiBob, RipplingChangedVisierBambooHRno first choiceagainst: ADP DataCloud, HireVue, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Pymetrics, Visier, Workday People Analytics
Three alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, HiBobThree alternatives
BambooHR, Crunchr People Analytics, VisierSeven alternatives
ChartHop, Crunchr, HiBob, Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
Culture Amp, Google Sheets, ThriveaGPT-6 LunaChartHopChartHopHeldCrunchr, One Model, VisierMicrosoft Power BIno first choiceagainst: Apploye, Buddy Punch, Deputy, Desklog, Hubstaff, Monitask, Time Doctor, Vericlock, When I Work, Workday People Analytics
Two alternatives
One Model, VisierTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, VisierFour alternatives
ChartHop, Orgvue, SAP People Intelligence, Workday People AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Zoho Analytics, Zoho PeopleMuse Glimmer 30BCrunchragainst: VisierChartHop, CrunchrChangedVisieragainst: TableauBambooHR, Zoho Peopleno first choiceagainst: ActivTrak, Hubstaff, Teramind, Time Doctor
Six alternatives
BambooHR, ChartHop, HiBob, Knoetic, PeoplePilot, ThriveSparrowTwo alternatives
BambooHR, HiBobSix alternatives
ADP Workforce Now, ChartHop, Crunchr, One Model, SAP SuccessFactors People Analytics, Workday People AnalyticsThree alternatives
15Five, Leapsome, PeoplelogicBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:24 | yes | 11 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 25 | 68 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 1 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:09 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:23 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 17 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 6 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 10 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 24 | 268 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 18 | 56 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 25 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 14 | 114 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 5 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:51 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:35 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:03 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 5 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:22 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 18 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:58 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:55 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:47 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 2 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:39 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 25 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 24 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:32 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Eightfold read as Eightfold AI
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion HCM Analytics
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Peakon read as Workday Peakon
Power BI read as Microsoft Power BI
Qualtrics read as Qualtrics EmployeeXM
SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors
SuccessFactors (SAP) read as SAP SuccessFactors
Workday read as Workday People Analytics
Unresolved, counted raw
Amazon's hiring tool
Bossware
Cernor
Fama
HR Space
HiBob People Analytics
MyAnalytics
OneScore (by HiringCafe)
Panalyt
PeopleLens AI
Sapient Insights
Synergy (formerly ChartHop)
UKG People Analytics
brioHR
eqtble : People Analytics as a Service
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.