People analytics · November 2026 Edition
HiBob vs Visier
Three of fourteen models named HiBob first on the direct prompt; one named Visier. HiBob was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Visier by fourteen and HiBob carries 28 labels and Visier 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in twenty-two categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
First-choice share12%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%36%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2847A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, HiBob reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs HiBob · ChartHop vs Visier · Crunchr vs HiBob
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the people analytics page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HiBobFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVisier
Direct315 against Visier
Paraphrase433 against Visier
Comparative013
Budget-constrained004 against Visier
Scale-constrained011 against Visier
Negative014 against Visier
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where HiBob and Visier stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
HiBob Visier first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HiBob on the left and Visier on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where HiBob and Visier stood in it.
HiBob first, Visier not the choice
3 of 14 modelsVisier was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniHiBob alternatives: Crunchr, Orgvue, Perceptyx
Llama 4 MaverickHiBob alternatives: 15Five, BambooHR, ChartHop, Crunchr, Culture Amp, Rippling
Qwen 3.7 FlashHiBob alternatives: ChartHop, Crunchr
Visier first, HiBob an alternative
1 of 14 modelsHiBob was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop, Visier alternatives: HiBob, Lattice, Leapsome, Rippling
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Grok 4.20ChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Lattice
Mistral SmallChartHop, Crunchr alternatives: HiBob
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Crunchr, Culture Amp, HiBob, One Model
MiniMax M2.5Crunchr alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, HiBob
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: One Model, Visier
Muse Glimmer 30BCrunchr alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, HiBob, Knoetic, PeoplePilot, ThriveSparrow
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5PeoplePilot alternatives: Crunchr, HiBob People Analytics, Lattice, Orgnostic
Perplexity SonarCrunchr alternatives: ChartHop, Culture Amp, Lattice
Kimi K2ChartHop, Crunchr
GLM 4.7 FlashXCrunchr alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: Visier leads at enterprise.
Visier65%#1 of 12HiBob0%#– of 12What the models said about HiBob
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“HiBob is a modern HR platform built specifically for mid-sized organizations that offers the strongest overall blend of configurability, user experience, analytics depth” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“HiBob and Crunchr are standout choices due to their strong analytics, scalability, and focus on mid-market needs.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Visier
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Options to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Visier and Crunchr (enterprise tier)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Visier, Workday, or other enterprise platforms” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise platforms like Visier, One Model, or Workday Peakon often cost tens of thousands of dollars annually and require dedicated data teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Visier offers dedicated people analytics with custom quotes and provides predictive models and an AI assistant for enterprise people analytics functions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Widely recognized as the market leader in pure-play people analytics, designed specifically for large-scale enterprise environments.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Visier or ChartHop if you have a mature HR function, multiple HR systems, and want to minimize data cleaning effort” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.