TeamOhana is a workforce planning and org design platform that connects Finance, HR, and Talent teams in a single real-time ledger · teamohana.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
ChartHop is first at 15%.
ChartHop is first at 28%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Anaplan is first at 43%.
“Choose ChartHop or TeamOhana if HR and Recruiting are heavily involved”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“Start with TeamOhana if you want a purpose-built, easy-to-implement solution”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“My default recommendation: TeamOhana”GPT-6 Luna · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Best for: Companies needing to reconcile approved headcount plans against live reqs and actual hires.”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · alternative
No model argued against it.
The products named in the same answers as TeamOhana, over the 45 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 30 | 7 | View → | |
| 28 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 19 | 2 | View → | |
| 19 | 1 | View → | |
| 17 | 0 | View → | |
| 16 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 13 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of TeamOhana →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on TeamOhana's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 43 of the 45 answers that named TeamOhana and are not a share of its labels.
128 of the 139 domain citations in answers naming TeamOhana came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 59 | 6 | 2026-09-28 | Workforce planning, Org charts | |
| Podcast or video | 41 | 11 | 2026-09-17 | Workforce planning | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 27 | 3 | 2026-09-11 | Workforce planning | |
| Case study | 14 | 4 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Every page teamohana.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.