Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Workforce planning › ChartHop vs Homebase
Workforce planning · November 2026 Edition

ChartHop vs Homebase

Ten of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; zero named Homebase. ChartHop was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Homebase by ten and ChartHop carries 42 labels and Homebase 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

ChartHop

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

Homebase

accepted challenger

Named in twelve categories this edition.

First-choice share28%11%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#3A position in a field of 20; printed, not drawn.
Labels4210A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ChartHop reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Planful was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Pigment · ChartHop vs TeamOhana · ChartHop vs 4PLAN HR

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce planning page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ChartHopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsHomebase
Direct100
Paraphrase50
Comparative00
Budget-constrained062 against ChartHop
Scale-constrained10
Negative001 against ChartHop
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ChartHop and Homebase stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
ChartHop Homebase first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and Homebase on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ChartHop and Homebase stood in it.

ChartHop first, Homebase not the choice

10 of 14 modelsHomebase was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5ChartHop, Paylocity alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Rippling, Vena, Visier Workforce Planning
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop, Pigment, TeamOhana alternatives: Cube, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Runn, Saviom, TeamOhana
Grok 4.20ChartHop alternatives: Anaplan, Rippling, Visier Workforce Planning
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Pigment, Planful, TeamOhana, Workday Adaptive Planning
Llama 4 MaverickChartHop alternatives: Vena
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Deel Workforce Planning, Monday.com, Planful, Rotageek, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2ChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Dayforce, Planful, TeamOhana, UKG Pro Workforce Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Dayforce, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning
Muse Glimmer 30BChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Centage, Disprz, Orgvue, Planful, Prophix, Vena

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallDisprz alternatives: ChartHop, Orgvue, Planful
MiniMax M2.5Disprz alternatives: ChartHop, HiBob, Orgvue, Planful, TeamOhana

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Anaplan, HiBob, Rippling
GPT-6 LunaPigment alternatives: Adaptive from Workday, Planful, TeamOhana

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ChartHop leads by four points.
ChartHop15%#1 of 15
Homebase11%#4 of 15
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
ChartHop leads by eighteen points.
ChartHop28%#1 of 20
Homebase11%#3 of 20
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
ChartHop leads by four points.
ChartHop4%#6 of 14
Homebase0%#– of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about ChartHop

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“its current site asks you to request a tailored proposal rather than showing a public price, so check the quote before shortlisting it” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise options like Visier, Workday, or ChartHop ... start at $10k+/year, making them unsuitable for limited budgets” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“ChartHop's real entry rate is $5 per employee per month for Core, not the $8 that circulates on comparison sites.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“ChartHop | Top Pick for Mid-Market | Extremely user-friendly; offers real-time org visibility, headcount, and compensation planning in one dashboard.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“ChartHop – frequently cited for mid-market org design, headcount and compensation planning with a modular per-employee pricing model.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Homebase

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.