Index › HR › Workforce planning and analytics › Workforce planning › 4PLAN HR vs Connecteam
Workforce planning · November 2026 Edition

4PLAN HR vs Connecteam

Zero of fourteen models named 4PLAN HR first on the direct prompt; zero named Connecteam. 4PLAN HR was named by seven of the fourteen models and Connecteam by ten and 4PLAN HR carries 15 labels and Connecteam 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

4PLAN HR

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Connecteam

accepted challenger

Named in eighteen categories this edition.

First-choice share5%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 20; printed, not drawn.
Labels1513A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, 4PLAN HR reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ChartHop was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs 4PLAN HR · ChartHop vs Connecteam · Pigment vs 4PLAN HR

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce planning page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
4PLAN HRFirst choices, of fourteen modelsConnecteam
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative001 against Connecteam
Budget-constrained02
Scale-constrained30
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where 4PLAN HR and Connecteam stood in it.
ModelDirect4HParaphrase4HComparative4HBudget-constrained4HScale-constrained4HNegative4H
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.204H4H
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash4H
Kimi K24H4H
GLM 4.7 FlashX4H
MiniMax M2.54H
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B4H4H4H
4H 4PLAN HR Connecteam4H first choice4H named as an alternative4H argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 4PLAN HR on the left and Connecteam on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where 4PLAN HR and Connecteam stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Deel Workforce Planning, Monday.com, Planful, Rotageek, Visier Workforce Planning, Workday Adaptive Planning
Kimi K2ChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Abacum, Dayforce, Planful, TeamOhana, UKG Pro Workforce Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Dayforce, UKG Pro Workforce Management, Visier Workforce Planning
Muse Glimmer 30BChartHop alternatives: 4PLAN HR, Centage, Disprz, Orgvue, Planful, Prophix, Vena

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5ChartHop, Paylocity alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Rippling, Vena, Visier Workforce Planning
GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: Anaplan, HiBob, Rippling
Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop, Pigment, TeamOhana alternatives: Cube, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Planful, Runn, Saviom, TeamOhana
Grok 4.20ChartHop alternatives: Anaplan, Rippling, Visier Workforce Planning
Mistral SmallDisprz alternatives: ChartHop, Orgvue, Planful
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Pigment, Planful, TeamOhana, Workday Adaptive Planning
Llama 4 MaverickChartHop alternatives: Vena
MiniMax M2.5Disprz alternatives: ChartHop, HiBob, Orgvue, Planful, TeamOhana
GPT-6 LunaPigment alternatives: Adaptive from Workday, Planful, TeamOhana

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
4PLAN HR is not named for this buyer.
Connecteam11%#5 of 15
4PLAN HR—not named
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: 4PLAN HR leads at mid-market.
4PLAN HR5%#5 of 20
Connecteam4%#8 of 20
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Connecteam is not named for this buyer.
4PLAN HR0%#– of 14
Connecteam—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about 4PLAN HR

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Demo 2–3 dedicated tools — ChartHop, 4PLAN HR, and either Pigment (if Finance uses it) or Planful/Prophix” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Dedicated tools: 4PLAN HR, Pigment, or similar platforms designed for mid-market” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“If you have about 500 employees or more, demo 4PLAN HR” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Connecteam

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Not a strategic planning tool.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Connecteam's free plan if you have 10 or fewer employees, as it offers the most comprehensive feature set at no cost.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.