Org charts and org design · November 2026 Edition
ChartHop vs OrgChart
Nine of fourteen models named ChartHop first on the direct prompt; two named OrgChart. ChartHop was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and OrgChart by twelve and ChartHop carries 48 labels and OrgChart 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share28%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels4824A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ChartHop reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Lucidchart was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. ChartHop vs Organimi · ChartHop vs Lucidchart · ChartHop vs Functionly
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the org charts and org design page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ChartHopFirst choices, of fourteen modelsOrgChart
Direct92
Paraphrase41
Comparative51
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained32
Negative301 against ChartHop · 3 against OrgChart
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ChartHop and OrgChart stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
ChartHop OrgChart first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ChartHop on the left and OrgChart on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ChartHop and OrgChart stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Mistral SmallChartHop, OrgChart alternatives: Functionly, Lucidchart, Workleap
ChartHop first, OrgChart an alternative
8 of 14 modelsOrgChart was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashChartHop alternatives: HiBob, Organimi, Rippling, Sift, TeamOhana
Perplexity SonarChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Organimi
DeepSeek V4 FlashChartHop alternatives: Functionly, OrgChart
Qwen 3.7 FlashChartHop, Organizational Charts alternatives: BambooHR, Rippling, iOrgChart
Kimi K2ChartHop, Pingboard alternatives: Lucidchart
GLM 4.7 FlashXChartHop alternatives: Lucidchart, Microsoft Visio, Pingboard, SmartDraw
MiniMax M2.5Built, ChartHop alternatives: GoProfiles, Lucidchart, OrgChart, Organimi, Workleap
GPT-6 LunaChartHop alternatives: OrgChart
OrgChart first, ChartHop not the choice
1 of 14 modelsChartHop was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniOrgChart alternatives: Lucid, Microsoft Visio, Miro
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Pingboard alternatives: BambooHR, ChartHop, Factorial, Personio
Grok 4.20Lucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Creately, Functionly, Microsoft Visio, Miro, Organimi, Pingboard
Muse Glimmer 30BLucidchart alternatives: ChartHop, Organimi, Pingboard
Neither was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 MaverickLucidchart alternatives: Miro, Planfix
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
ChartHop0%#8 of 13OrgChart0%#13 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
ChartHop leads by nineteen points.
ChartHop28%#1 of 15OrgChart9%#5 of 15Enterprise
What the models said about ChartHop
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“full-featured enterprise tiers of tools like ChartHop or OrgChart ... are often costly overkill for small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“If you need the org chart to stay current with HR data ... ChartHop, Workleap Pingboard, FirstHR, BambooHR, Deel, Factorial, or Ingentis org.manager are the best choices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about OrgChart
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“I'd specifically avoid OrgChart (despite its decent ratings, the usability issues are a recurring theme)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“tools like ChartHop or OrgChart ... are often costly overkill for small-to-medium businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution level: Medium-high if your team lacks technical expertise.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tools like OrgChart, ChartHop, or Pingboard (Workleap) are typically the right weight class for your size.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“OrgChart and ChartHop are the top choices due to their automation, integration, and advanced features” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Functionly (Collaborative Design) or Ingentis/orgChart (Chart & Analytics)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
ChartHop vs OrganimiChartHop vs LucidchartChartHop vs FunctionlyChartHop vs PingboardChartHop vs OrgvueChartHop vs MiroOrganimi vs OrgChartLucidchart vs OrgChartFunctionly vs OrgChartOrgChart vs PingboardOrgChart vs OrgvueOrgChart vs MiroAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full org charts standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.