Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › HR › Performance and talent management › Succession planning › Teamflect vs ChartHop
Succession planning · November 2026 Edition

Teamflect vs ChartHop

Zero of fourteen models named Teamflect first on the direct prompt; zero named ChartHop. Teamflect was named by seven of the fourteen models and ChartHop by ten and Teamflect carries 10 labels and ChartHop 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Teamflect

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

ChartHop

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share9%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1016A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teamflect reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.TalentGuard Succession Planning was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Lattice vs Teamflect · Lattice vs ChartHop · PerformYard vs Teamflect

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the succession planning page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TeamflectFirst choices, of fourteen modelsChartHop
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained51
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teamflect and ChartHop stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Teamflect ChartHop first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teamflect on the left and ChartHop on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teamflect and ChartHop stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashLattice, Leapsome alternatives: HiBob, SuccessionHR, TalentGuard Succession Planning, Teamflect
Kimi K2PerformYard, SuccessionNow alternatives: Paycom, Teamflect, UKG Ready
MiniMax M2.5PerformYard, SuccessionNow alternatives: ChartHop, Eightfold AI

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Engagedly alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, Lattice, Peoplebox
GPT-5.4 miniLattice alternatives: Cornerstone Succession, PerformYard
Perplexity SonarPeoplebox alternatives: Dayforce, Engagedly, Lattice, TalentGuard Succession Planning
Grok 4.20PerformYard alternatives: ClayHR, Disprz, SuccessionNow, TalentGuard Succession Planning
Mistral SmallSuccessionNow, SuccessionStack alternatives: Disprz, TalentGuard Succession Planning
DeepSeek V4 FlashTalentGuard Succession Planning alternatives: Disprz, Neobrain, UKG Pro Succession Planning
Llama 4 MaverickDisprz, Neobrain, TalentGuard Succession Planning
Qwen 3.7 FlashDisprz alternatives: Neobrain, PerformYard, TalentGuard Succession Planning
GLM 4.7 FlashXDisprz alternatives: Lattice, Neobrain, PerformYard, SuccessionNow, TalentGuard Succession Planning
GPT-6 LunaLattice alternatives: Engagedly, Your existing HCM's succession module
Muse Glimmer 30BSuccessionStack alternatives: PerformYard, SuccessionNow

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Teamflect leads by twelve points.
Teamflect12%#2 of 13
ChartHop0%#– of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Teamflect leads by eight points.
Teamflect9%#4 of 12
ChartHop2%#6 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Teamflect is not named for this buyer.
Teamflect—not named
ChartHop0%#12 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Teamflect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“1. Teamflect ⭐ Best Free Option ... Completely free starter tier with essential features” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about ChartHop

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared
Lattice vs TeamflectLattice vs ChartHopPerformYard vs TeamflectPerformYard vs ChartHopSuccessionNow vs TeamflectSuccessionNow vs ChartHopTeamflect vs TalentGuard Succession PlanningTalentGuard Succession Planning vs ChartHopAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full succession planning standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.