Index › HR › Performance and talent management › Talent intelligence · November 2026 Edition

Talent intelligence

Asked as “talent intelligence platform”, and as “AI talent platform for hiring and mobility”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
21%
Contested · Lessie AI 13%
21SeekOut Recruit13Lessie AI12Eightfold AI54others

21% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SeekOut Recruit (21%) replaces Pin (27% then, 12% now), 9 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.SeekOut Recruit leads at 21%, replacing Pin, which led at 27% and stands at 12% now: 9 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01SeekOut Recruit21%18%45accepted challenger▲+17Since October 2026: 4% → 21%, +17 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.4% → 21%
02Lessie AI13%0%10accepted challenger▲+13Since October 2026: 0% → 13%, +13 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.0% → 13%
03Pin12%0%15accepted challenger▼−15Since October 2026: 27% → 12%, −15 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.27% → 12%
04Eightfold AI12%48%65criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 12%
05hireEZ6%31%16criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 6%
06Loxo4%20%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
07Phenom4%40%40criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
08Gem2%7%15accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 14% → 2%, −12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.14% → 2%
09Gloat2%28%29criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
10Findem2%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Beamery0%53%34criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
14Workday Skills Cloud0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13LinkedIn Talent Insights0%30%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Draup0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Lightcast0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
S01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01SeekOut Recruit21%
02Lessie AI13%
03Pin12%
04Eightfold AI12%
05hireEZ6%
06Loxo4%
07Phenom4%
08Gem2%
09Gloat2%
10Findem2%
11Lightcast0%
12Draup0%
13LinkedIn Talent Insights0%
14Workday Skills Cloud0%
15Beamery0%

What they warned about

Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Eightfold AI
48%
31 of 65 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“Currently facing a 2026 class-action lawsuit in California alleging it builds undisclosed "consumer reports" on job candidates using unverified third-party data” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Phenom
40%
16 of 40 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Why to Avoid: Despite its popularity among large enterprises, implementation is notoriously difficult.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Beamery
53%
18 of 34 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“What I'd Avoid ... Beamery | Now owned by Workday; strong but mid-market pricing reportedly starts around $50K+” Kimi K2, paraphrase prompt
Gloat
28%
8 of 29 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Platforms to Skip for Your Situation | Gloat | Built for enterprises (5,000+ employees); slow setup, enterprise pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 878 links across 241 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 13 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · G235 answers · 70 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Eightfold26 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Pin24 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow17 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Sapia.ai16 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SeekOut12 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Lessie12 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Skima12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Engagedly11 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
11 answers · 14 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Wrangle11 answers · 13 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best talent intelligence platform”, “talent intelligence platform”, “talent intelligence platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
SeekOut Recruit seekout.com21%1215,79619
Lessie lessie.ai
Lessie AI 13%
13%30590321,371 company2
Pin pin.com12%104368,000243,38524,375284
Eightfold eightfold.ai
Eightfold AI 12%
12%5204,40018753,360 company171
hireEZ hireez.com6%1742,400433,058357
Loxo loxo.co4%1005,4001075,248233
Metaview metaview.ai4%479,9004939,923$9,200551
Phenom phenom.com4%33118,1002,22924,4870
Gem gem.com2%182246,000225,11616,29110
Gloat gloat.com2%28727,10035922,7340

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 17 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (eightfold.ai, pin.com, seekout.com). The first result for “best talent intelligence platform” is rollingarrays.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best talent intelligence platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which AI talent platform for hiring and mobility would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top talent intelligence platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best talent intelligence platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a talent intelligence platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which talent intelligence platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Arya, Pin
Five alternatives365Talents, Eightfold AI, Gem, Loxo, iCIMS Talent Cloud
against: Beamery, Phenom
no first choiceChanged
Four alternativesFuel50, Loxo, Manatal, Phenom
against: Eightfold AI
no first choiceLessie AI
Three alternativesGem, Tapflow, Wrangle
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI
no first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI
GPT-5.4 miniSeekOut Recruit
Two alternativesEightfold AI, hireEZ
Fuel50Changed
Two alternativesEightfold AI, Phenom
Eightfold AI
Four alternativesBeamery, Gloat, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit
Loxo
One alternativeMetaview
against: 365Talents, hireEZ
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashFindem
Three alternativesGem, Loxo, SeekOut Recruit
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Phenom
SeekOut RecruitChanged
Three alternativesFindem, Gloat, Phenom
against: Eightfold AI
Eightfold AI
Five alternativesBeamery, Findem, Gloat, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit
Pin
Four alternativesContactOut, Juicebox, Loxo, Metaview
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, hireEZ
no first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Phenomnothing named
Perplexity SonarhireEZ
Two alternativesGem, SeekOut Recruit
against: Eightfold AI
LeverChanged
Three alternatives365Talents, Ashby, Eightfold AI
Eightfold AI
Nine alternatives365Talents, Beamery, Draup, Gloat, Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, hireEZ
Pin
Three alternativesLessie AI, Loxo, Monster
against: Beamery, Phenom, Workday Skills Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Findem, Gloat, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, hireEZ
Grok 4.20Loxo
Three alternativesEightfold AI, Gem, SeekOut Recruit
Eightfold AIChanged
One alternativeSeekOut Recruit
against: Phenom
Eightfold AI
Seven alternativesBeamery, Draup, Gloat, Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights, SeekOut Recruit, TalentNeuron
Juicebox, Qureos
Two alternativesManatal, Skima AI
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI, LinkedIn Talent Insights, SeekOut Recruit, hireEZ
SeekOut Recruit
Two alternativesBeamery, Eightfold AI
against: LinkedIn Talent Insights
against: Beamery, Censia, Eightfold AI, Entelo, Findem, Gloat, HireVue, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, Pymetrics, Retorio, SeekOut Recruit, Talview, Visier, Workday Skills Cloud
Mistral SmallEightfold AI, SeekOut Recruit
Two alternativesSapia.ai, iCIMS Talent Cloud
Eightfold AI, GloatChanged
Two alternativesPhenom, Workday Skills Cloud
Eightfold AI
Four alternativesAshby, Gloat, Loxo, SeekOut Recruit
Lessie AI
Three alternativesGem, Pin, SeekOut Recruit
no first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Gloat, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit
DeepSeek V4 FlashSeekOut Recruit
Two alternativesGem, hireEZ
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI
EngagedlyChanged
Two alternativesFuel50, Phenom
against: Eightfold AI, Gloat, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday Skills Cloud
Eightfold AI
Six alternativesAshby, Beamery, Gloat, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Loxo, SeekOut Recruit
Lessie AI
Three alternativesManatal, Pin, Wrangle
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Phenom
SeekOut Recruit
Two alternativesEngagedly, Fuel50
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Gloat, Workday Skills Cloud
against: Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, Recruit CRM, SmartRecruiters, Workday Skills Cloud
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceEightfold AIChanged
Two alternativesBob Hiring, iMocha
no first choiceManatal
Three alternativesLessie AI, Pin, SeekOut Recruit
no first choiceagainst: Beamery, Eightfold AI, LinkedIn Talent Insights
Qwen 3.7 FlashLessie AI, hireEZ
Two alternativesGem, SeekOut Recruit
against: Eightfold AI
PhenomChanged
One alternativeEngagedly
against: Eightfold AI, Gloat, SeekOut Recruit
Eightfold AI
Seven alternativesBeamery, Draup, Gloat, Lightcast, Metaview, Revelio Labs, SeekOut Recruit
Lessie AI
Three alternativesOwler, Pin, SeekOut Recruit
against: Eightfold AI, Findem, Saavvi
no first choiceagainst: Greenhouse, Lever, LinkedIn Talent Solutionsagainst: CloudHire, Criteria Corp, Phenom, Talent.io, Wellfound, ZoomInfo Talent
Kimi K2Pin, SeekOut Recruit
Two alternativesAshby, Greenhouse
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Phenom
hireEZChanged
Eight alternativesEngagedly, GoFIGR, Lever, Oracle Talent Management, Phenom, SAP Career & Talent Development, Skills Cloud, Workday Skills Cloud
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Gloat
Beamery, Eightfold AI
Nine alternativesFuel50, Gloat, HiredScore, Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom, Revelio Labs, SeekOut Recruit, hireEZ
Pin
Four alternativesBreezy HR, JazzHR, Recooty, Zoho Recruit
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Phenom
no first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, HireVue
GLM 4.7 FlashXSeekOut Recruit
Two alternativesCeipal, Talent.ai
against: Eightfold AI, Phenom
GoFIGRChanged
Three alternativesEightfold AI, Moonhub, Workday Talent Management
Lightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights
Seven alternativesBeamery, Eightfold AI, Phenom TXM Platform, SeekOut Recruit, The Cognitive, Visier, Workday Skills Cloud
Lessie AI, Metaview
Four alternativesPin, SeekOut Recruit, Wrangle, Zoho Recruit
against: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Gloat, LinkedIn Talent Insights, Loxo
no first choiceagainst: Greenhouse, Loxo, Naukri.com, Talent.com, Talentou AI
MiniMax M2.5Greenhouse, SeekOut Recruit
Two alternativesEightfold AI, hireEZ
Eightfold AIChanged
Two alternativesGloat, Workday Talent Management
Eightfold AI
Five alternativesBeamery, Findem, Gloat, LinkedIn Talent Insights, SeekOut Recruit
Metaview, Wrangle
Three alternativesLightcast, LinkedIn Talent Insights, The Cognitive
against: Eightfold AI, Loxo, SeekOut Recruit
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaSeekOut Recruit
One alternativeLightcast
PhenomChanged
Two alternativesEightfold AI, HiredScore
no first choiceGem
One alternativeSeekOut Recruit Core
no first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Manatal, Talenteria, Workday Recruiting
Muse Glimmer 30BSeekOut Recruit
Three alternativesEightfold AI, Lessie AI, hireEZ
against: Beamery, Draup
Eightfold AIChanged
Four alternatives365Talents, Engagedly, Fuel50, Gloat
Eightfold AI
Three alternativesBeamery, Gloat, SeekOut Recruit
Lessie AI, Pinagainst: Beamery, Eightfold AI, Gem, Phenom, SeekOut Recruit, hireEZno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Phenom, Reejig
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:51yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:52yes14 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:11yes925 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:06yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:12yes2140 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:04yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:59yes2423 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:43yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:37yes1041 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:53yes1423 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:08yes2127 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:25yes953 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:55yes248 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:04yes1424 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:49yes107 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:37yes46 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:13no015 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:27yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:25yes1026 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:35yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:10yes2428 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:52yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:20yes20114 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:51yes2567 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:15yes25122 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:21yes1564 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:50yes318 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:20yes2330 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:58yes138 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:55yes89 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:27yes926 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:59yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:27yes933 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:45yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:09yes2530 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:45yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:37yes916 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:47yes2071 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:34yes2583 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:55yes1035 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:03yes927 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:35yes1530 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:22yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:15yes25 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:01yes1022 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:40yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:20yes1036 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:33yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:02yes2338 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:17yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:51yes1019 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:18yes1037 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:28yes1238 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:55yes519 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:13yes311 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:47yes1218 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:29no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:59no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:15no016 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:15yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:30yes1540 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:33no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:53yes2339 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:56yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:17no031 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:30yes1548 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:27yes953 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:31no093 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:44yes219 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:12yes1218 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:43yes1710 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:41yes67 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:45no013 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:21yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:27yes1430 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:34yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:07yes2522 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:10yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:47yes1045 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:51yes2534 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:20yes1545 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:27no014 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:12yes427 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:20yes1921 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Eightfold read as Eightfold AI
SeekOut read as SeekOut Recruit
Workday read as Workday Skills Cloud
Workday Talent Marketplace read as Workday Skills Cloud
ZoomInfo read as ZoomInfo Talent
iCIMS read as iCIMS Talent Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Ascendify
Bob Hiring
Claro
Claro Analytics
CloudHire
Emsi
HiredScores
Humantelligence
IBM Corporation
JobsPikr
Ninja Gig
Oracle Corporation
Oracle Talent Management
Owler
Randstad RiseSmart
SAP Career & Talent Development
Talent.ai
Talentou AI
Workday Inc.
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Succession planningCoaching platforms →