Index › HR › Performance and talent management › Goals and OKRs · November 2026 Edition

Goals and OKRs

Asked as “OKR software”, and as “goal management platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · Profit.co 13%
29Tability13Profit.co12Perdoo46others

29% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Tability (29%) replaces Perdoo (24% then, 12% now), 17 points clear, past the 13-point floor.Tability leads at 29%, replacing Perdoo, which led at 24% and stands at 12% now: 17 points clear, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Tability29%2%44accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 22% → 29%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.22% → 29%
02Profit.co13%11%44accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 7% → 13%, +6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 13%
03Perdoo12%12%52accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 24% → 12%, −12 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.24% → 12%
04Lattice10%14%43accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 13% → 10%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.13% → 10%
05Leapsome4%4%23accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
06OKRs Tool4%10%20accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 4%
07Mooncamp4%6%16accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%
08Teamflect4%0%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
09Weekdone2%6%32accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
10Betterworks2%31%32criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
11Quantive2%31%26criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
17Microsoft Viva Goals0%55%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
16Asana0%52%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
15Monday.com0%46%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14ClickUp0%44%18criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
13WorkBoard0%34%32criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
1215Five0%9%33accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Tability29%
02Profit.co13%
03Perdoo12%
04Lattice10%
05Leapsome4%
06OKRs Tool4%
07Mooncamp4%
08Teamflect4%
09Weekdone2%
10Betterworks2%
11Quantive2%
1215Five0%
13WorkBoard0%
14ClickUp0%
15Monday.com0%
16Asana0%
17Microsoft Viva Goals0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
WorkBoard
34%
11 of 32 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“the hefty price tag prevents company-wide rollout, its complex interface could be an obstacle for company-wide adoption, and users complain about app performance” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Betterworks
31%
10 of 32 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid ... enterprise-heavy options like Betterworks/Quantive unless you're scaling rapidly.” Grok 4.20, direct prompt
Microsoft Viva Goals
55%
12 of 22 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“avoid discontinued products, not write off whole vendors based on a few reviews... old recommendations for Ally.io” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
Asana
52%
11 of 21 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid "Vibe-Based" Tools: While Asana, Monday.com, and Notion are popular, they are becoming difficult to manage for true OKR accountability” Qwen 3.7 Flash, direct prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 811 links across 134 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Tability55 answers · 136 citations · 12 models
vendor site · OKRs Tool42 answers · 78 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ONES.com30 answers · 67 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Worxmate30 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Mooncamp23 answers · 25 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Profit.co22 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group18 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow14 answers · 14 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Rework14 answers · 14 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G212 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Synergita10 answers · 15 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best okr software”, “okr software”, “okr tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Tability tability.io29%1183201439,8043
Profit.co profit.co13%129590028,00026
Perdoo perdoo.com12%12339018,14716
Lattice lattice.com10%62590,50013,900122,123$1,3281207
Leapsome leapsome.com4%3782,9003251,450$18,53160
OKRs Tool okrstool.com4%58260206,73811
Mooncamp mooncamp.com4%68720058,6781
Teamflect teamflect.com4%1368801212,592308
Synergita OKR synergita.com4%246,0419
SugarOKR sugarokr.com4%1020066

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 12 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (mooncamp.com, okrstool.com, synergita.com, tability.io). The first result for “best okr software” is okrstool.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best OKR software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which goal management platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top OKR tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best OKR software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a OKR software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which OKR tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp
Four alternativesFlowyTeam, Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability
LatticeChanged
Five alternatives15Five, Asana, Engagedly, Profit.co, Weekdone
Tability
Eleven alternativesAtlassian Goals, Betterworks, Cascade Strategy, Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Planisware, Profit.co, Quantive, Weekdone, WorkBoard
BOJA OKR, Synergita OKR
Two alternativesOKRs Tool, Tability
no first choiceagainst: Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard
GPT-5.4 miniBetterworks
Four alternativesLattice, Leapsome, Perdoo, WorkBoard
LatticeChanged
Five alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome, Perdoo, Weekdone
no first choice
Seven alternativesBetterworks, Cascade Strategy, Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard, Workpath
against: Lattice
OKRs Tool, Synergita OKR
One alternativeTability
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashProfit.co
Four alternativesLattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
against: Betterworks, WorkBoard
LatticeChanged
Four alternativesMicrosoft Viva Goals, Profit.co, Quantive, Tability
no first choicePerdoo
Six alternativesClickUp, Coda, Notion, OKRs Tool, Teamflect, Weekdone
against: Profit.co, WorkBoard
no first choice
Five alternativesLattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Viva Goals, Profit.co, Quantive
against: 7Geese, Asana, ClickUp, Excel, Google Sheets, Koan, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive, Trello
Perplexity SonarCascade Strategy
Two alternativesPerdoo, Tability
against: Profit.co
PerdooChanged
Two alternativesAsana, Tability
against: Betterworks, WorkBoard
Perdoo, Tability
Ten alternativesAsana, Betterworks, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Mooncamp, Profit.co, Quantive Results, Teamflect, Weekdone, WorkBoard
against: ClickUp
Tability
Four alternativesClickUp, OKRs Tool, ONES.com, Teamflect
no first choiceagainst: 15Five, Asana, Betterworks, ClickUp, Culture Amp, HiBob, Lattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Viva Goals, Monday.com, Mooncamp, Notion, Perdoo
Grok 4.20Tability
Three alternatives15Five, Lattice, Leapsome
against: Asana, Betterworks, Jira, Quantive, WorkBoard
LatticeChanged
Three alternativesLeapsome, Perdoo, Tability
against: Asana, ClickUp, Engagedly, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard
Weekdone
Six alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive, Tability
Profit.co
Three alternativesPerdoo, Tability, Teamflect
against: 15Five, Lattice, Quantive
no first choiceagainst: Asana, Businessmap, ClickUp, Perdoo, Profit.co, SimpleOKR, Synergita OKR
Mistral SmallTability
Two alternatives15Five, Leapsome
Perdoo, Profit.coChanged
Four alternatives15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, Ninety
Tability
Nine alternatives15Five, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Profit.co, Quantive, Weekdone, craft.io
Profit.co, SugarOKR
Two alternativesOKRs Tool, Perdoo
no first choiceagainst: Betterworks, Lattice, WorkBoard
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability
Four alternatives15Five, Leapsome, Perdoo, Profit.co
TabilityHeld
Four alternativesClickUp, Lattice, Mooncamp, Perdoo
Tability
Eight alternatives15Five, Lattice, Leapsome, ONES.com, Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone, WorkBoard
against: Asana, Betterworks, Microsoft Viva Goals, Monday.com
Tability
Three alternativesOKRs Tool, Perdoo, SugarOKR
no first choiceagainst: 7Geese, Koan, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantiveagainst: Koan, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, OKRs Tool, Perdoo, Quantive, Tability, WorkBoard
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceEngagedlyChangedno first choiceOKRs Tool
Two alternativesProfit.co, Tability
no first choiceagainst: Storyflow
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp
Three alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome
against: Asana, Monday.com, Notion
TabilityChanged
Three alternatives15Five, Lattice, Leapsome
Tability
Four alternativesOKRs Tool, Perdoo, Teamflect, WorkBoard
Teamflect
Five alternativesOKRs Tool, PeopleGoal, Profit.co, Tability, Weekdone
Quantive, Weekdone
Two alternativesPerdoo, Tability
against: Asana, ClickUp, Monday.com
against: 15Five, Asana, Betterworks, ClickUp, Excel/Google Sheets, Jira, Lattice, Monday.com
Kimi K2Tability
Four alternatives15Five, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.co
Lattice, LeapsomeChanged
Five alternatives15Five, Asana, Monday.com, Profit.co, Tability
no first choice
Six alternatives15Five, Lattice, Microsoft Viva Goals, Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone
against: Betterworks, Quantive
Profit.co
Five alternativesOKRs Tool, ONES.com, PeopleGoal, Synergita OKR, Tability
Tability
Four alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome, Profit.co
against: Asana, ClickUp, Jira Align, Microsoft Viva Goals, Monday.com, WorkBoard/Quantive
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability
Four alternatives15Five, Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone
TabilityHeld
Two alternativesPerdoo, Profit.co
Tability
Sixteen alternatives15Five, Asana, Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, ClickUp, Jira, Lattice, Monday.com, Notion, OKRnest, ONES.com, Perdoo, Quantive, Weekdone, WorkBoard, Wrike
Devokr, Teamflect
Six alternativesConfluence, OKR Board for Jira, ONES.com, Profit.co, Synergita OKR, Weekdone
no first choiceagainst: Asana, Excel/Google Sheets, Jira, OKR Board for Jira, Perdoo, PerformYard, Profit, Trello
MiniMax M2.5Leapsome, Tability
Three alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Lattice
TabilityChanged
Four alternativesMooncamp, PeopleGoal, Perdoo, Profit.co
Tability
Four alternativesCascade Strategy, Perdoo, Profit.co, WorkBoard
Perdoo, SugarOKR
Four alternativesOKRs Tool, PeopleGoal, Tability, Teamflect
no first choiceagainst: Generic Spreadsheets, Microsoft Viva Goals, Notion OKR Templates, Perdoo, WorkBoard
GPT-6 LunaPerdoo
Four alternativesBetterworks, Lattice, Profit.co, WorkBoard
Profit.coChanged
Two alternativesLattice, Mooncamp
Perdoo, Weekdone
Six alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Lattice, Mooncamp, Profit.co, WorkBoard
against: Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
Perdoo
Two alternativesOKRs Tool, Weekdone
no first choiceagainst: 7Geese, Betterworks, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive, WorkBoard
Muse Glimmer 30BTability
Five alternatives15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome, Perdoo, Profit.co
TabilityHeld
Two alternativesOKRs Tool, ThriveSparrow
Tability
Eight alternativesBetterworks, Cascade Strategy, Perdoo, Profit.co, Quantive Results, Teamflect, Weekdone, WorkBoard
Profit.co
Six alternativesNotion, OKRs Tool, ONES.com, Perdoo, Synergita OKR, Weekdone
no first choiceagainst: Betterworks, Microsoft Viva Goals, OKRs Tool, Quantive, formerly Gtmhub, WorkBoard
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:56yes1610 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:09yes39 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:38no013 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:49yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:24yes1530 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:48yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:12yes2126 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:50yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:03yes1462 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:29yes1124 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:07yes2542 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:30yes530 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:41yes214 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:25yes919 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:06yes1011 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:39yes44 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:45yes1123 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:40yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:23yes534 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:56yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:51yes2319 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:54yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:30yes527 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:55yes1537 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:30yes1561 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:00yes547 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:21yes316 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:29yes1317 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:06yes97 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:04yes48 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:03no017 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:31yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:21yes733 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:32yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:00yes2531 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:11yes54 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:08yes515 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:57yes1442 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:05yes1074 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:38yes1224 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:01yes823 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:28yes1429 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:15yes107 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:22yes44 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:55yes918 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:53yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:12yes935 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:39yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:18yes1920 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:09yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:30yes521 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:57yes916 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:48yes1515 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:15yes529 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:37yes315 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:40yes1416 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:24no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:29no09 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:41no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:52yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:05yes537 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:04no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:22yes2433 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:05yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:36no030 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:48yes1419 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:03yes1417 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:24yes1065 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:32yes229 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:15yes1425 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:02yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:50yes55 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:26yes920 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:40yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:06yes933 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:46yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:28yes2422 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:57yes95 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:44yes1334 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:57yes2524 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:48yes2435 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:37yes1465 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:53yes415 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:43yes2538 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ally.io read as Microsoft Viva Goals
Cascade read as Cascade Strategy
Gtmhub read as Quantive
Synergita read as Synergita OKR
Unresolved, counted raw
ClearPoint
Devokr
Falen
Futureworks
Generic Spreadsheets
OKR Board
OKRify
OKRnest
Profit
Quantive, formerly Gtmhub
Strides
craft.io
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← 360 feedbackInternal talent marketpl →