Index › HR › Performance and talent management › Goals and OKRs › Mooncamp vs Teamflect
Goals and OKRs · November 2026 Edition

Mooncamp vs Teamflect

Two of fourteen models named Mooncamp first on the direct prompt; zero named Teamflect. Mooncamp was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Teamflect by seven and Mooncamp carries 16 labels and Teamflect 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Mooncamp

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Teamflect

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels1611A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Mooncamp reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tability was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Tability vs Mooncamp · Tability vs Teamflect · Profit.co vs Mooncamp

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the goals and okrs page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MooncampFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTeamflect
Direct20
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained02
Scale-constrained00
Negative101 against Mooncamp
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Mooncamp and Teamflect stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Mooncamp Teamflect first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Mooncamp on the left and Teamflect on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Mooncamp and Teamflect stood in it.

Mooncamp first, Teamflect not the choice

2 of 14 modelsTeamflect was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mooncamp alternatives: FlowyTeam, Perdoo, Profit.co, Tability
Qwen 3.7 FlashMooncamp alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniBetterworks alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Perdoo, WorkBoard
Gemini 3.5 FlashProfit.co alternatives: Lattice, Leapsome, Microsoft Viva Goals, Quantive
Perplexity SonarCascade Strategy alternatives: Perdoo, Tability
Grok 4.20Tability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Leapsome
Mistral SmallTability alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome
DeepSeek V4 FlashTability alternatives: 15Five, Leapsome, Perdoo, Profit.co
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Tability alternatives: 15Five, Lattice, Perdoo, Profit.co
GLM 4.7 FlashXTability alternatives: 15Five, Perdoo, Profit.co, Weekdone
MiniMax M2.5Leapsome, Tability alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Lattice
GPT-6 LunaPerdoo alternatives: Betterworks, Lattice, Profit.co, WorkBoard
Muse Glimmer 30BTability alternatives: 15Five, Betterworks, Leapsome, Perdoo, Profit.co

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mooncamp leads by ten points.
Mooncamp12%#4 of 20
Teamflect2%#11 of 20
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Mooncamp4%#7 of 17
Teamflect4%#8 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Mooncamp leads by two points.
Mooncamp2%#8 of 11
Teamflect0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Mooncamp

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“five paid seats for Perdoo and Mooncamp, which can make "low" per-user pricing misleading for small teams” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tability or Mooncamp for clean UIs, weekly check-ins, and visual alignment” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Pure OKR Focus: Mooncamp” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“1. Mooncamp (Best Overall for Mid-Market)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Teamflect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“It is widely cited as having the most generous free tier for startups, often allowing up to 10 users for free.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.