Index › HR › Core HR and payroll › HRIS and HCM platforms · November 2026 Edition

HRIS and HCM platforms

Asked as “HRIS”, and as “human capital management platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
37%
Contested · Zoho People 21%
37Rippling21Zoho People08ADP Workforce Now35others

37% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+11Since October 2026: 26% → 37%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Rippling held the lead, +11 points on 26%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Rippling37%5%57endorsed leader▲+11Since October 2026: 26% → 37%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.26% → 37%
02Zoho People21%0%21accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 24% → 21%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.24% → 21%
03BambooHR8%22%65accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 9% → 8%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 8%
04HiBob8%3%37accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 8%
05ADP Workforce Now8%18%39accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 7% → 8%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 8%
06Gusto6%21%43accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 6%
07Paylocity4%10%31accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
08Deel2%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
09UKG Pro2%39%23criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14Paycom0%50%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
15Paycor0%48%21criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
13Workday HCM0%45%44criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
12SAP SuccessFactors0%39%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM0%29%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Namely0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Rippling37%
02Zoho People21%
03BambooHR8%
04HiBob8%
05ADP Workforce Now8%
06Gusto6%
07Paylocity4%
08Deel2%
09UKG Pro2%
10Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM0%
11Namely0%
12SAP SuccessFactors0%
13Workday HCM0%
14Paycom0%
15Paycor0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Workday HCM
45%
20 of 44 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Workday is described as extremely complex, requiring significant knowledge from every user, with implementations running months into six figures” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Paycor
48%
10 of 21 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Paycor requires excessive time and effort to manage issues that should be simple, with urgent payroll issues routinely taking weeks to resolve” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
BambooHR
22%
14 of 65 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“reports cite limited scalability and integration depth, while pricing may be high relative to its feature set” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
UKG Pro
39%
9 of 23 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“platforms that users have had negative experiences with. Some of the platforms mentioned include ADP Workforce Now, Paycom, UKG, and Paycor.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

67 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 641 links across 178 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 1 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · HiBob28 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group20 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · G213 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Zimyo12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Rippling11 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Workday11 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
10 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Reddit9 answers · 54 citations · 8 models
vendor site · TalentHR9 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
9 answers · 12 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best hris”, “hris”, “hris platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Rippling rippling.com37%1438301,00017,886712,399$42,013115
Zoho parent site
Zoho People 21%
21%3096,60050
BambooHR bamboohr.com8%107490,5005511,055,247$44,698106
HiBob hibob.com8%35414,800154266,143$541206
ADP parent site
ADP Workforce Now 8%
8%5082,740,00023,897
Gusto gusto.com6%742673,00010,5601,629,483118
Paylocity paylocity.com4%2501,220,0002,3801,682,033$8,493797
Deel deel.com2%48040,5001,210307,175$330,608118
Ceridian dayforce.com
Dayforce 2%
2%339450,0002,983208,25238
TalentHR talenthr.io2%89480189,83132

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forbes.com, hibob.com, reddit.com, workday.com). The first result for “best hris” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best HRIS for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which human capital management platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top HRIS platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best HRIS for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a HRIS. What should we look at?”Negative“Which HRIS platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldagainst: Workday HCMno first choice
Eight alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Deel, Gusto, HiBob, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
Zoho People
Three alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, TriNet
no first choiceagainst: Deel, Gusto, Namely, Paycor, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
GPT-5.4 miniRippling
Two alternativesBambooHR, HiBob
ADP Workforce NowChanged
Four alternativesOracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Ready/UKG, Workday HCM
no first choice
Eight alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Gusto
One alternativeTriNet
against: BambooHR
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashRippling
Three alternativesADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Paylocity
against: BambooHR, Workday HCM
RipplingHeld
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, HiBob, Paylocity
against: Gusto, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
no first choice
Nine alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Deel, Gusto, HiBob, Paycom, Paylocity, Rippling, Workday HCM
Zoho People
Four alternativesFreshteam, Gusto, Homebase, Rippling
against: ADP, BambooHR, Workday HCM
Rippling
Three alternativesADP Workforce Now, HiBob, UKG Pro
against: Workday HCM
against: ADP, BambooHR, Gusto, Namely, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paychex Flex, Paycom, SAP SuccessFactors, TriNet Zenefits, Workday HCM
Perplexity SonarRippling
Three alternativesHiBob, Paycom, Paylocity
against: BambooHR, Workday HCM
PaylocityChanged
Five alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, HiBob, Rippling, UKG Pro or Dayforce
against: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
BambooHR
Ten alternativesADP Workforce Now, Deel, Gusto, HiBob, Paycom, Paylocity, Personio, Rippling, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Zoho People
One alternativeGusto
against: BambooHR
no first choiceagainst: BambooHR, Gusto, HiBob, Paycor, Paylocity, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Grok 4.20HiBob, Rippling
Two alternativesBambooHR, Paylocity
against: ADP Workforce Now
RipplingChanged
Five alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, HiBob, Paycor, Paylocity
no first choice
Eight alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Leapsome, Paycor, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Zoho People
Three alternativesBambooHR, Connecteam, Gusto
Paylocity
Two alternativesBambooHR, UKG Pro
against: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Workday HCM
against: ADP, Paycor, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Mistral SmallBambooHR, Rippling
Two alternativesHiBob, Zoho People
HiBobChanged
Three alternativesBambooHR, Paycor, Rippling
against: SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
no first choiceZoho People
Three alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, Homebase
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Gusto, Paycom, Paycor, UKG Ready, Workday HCM
DeepSeek V4 FlashRippling
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, HiBob, Paylocity
RipplingHeld
Two alternativesBambooHR, HiBob
against: ADP Workforce Now, UKG Pro
Rippling
Seven alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Deel, Gusto, Paylocity, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Zoho People
Two alternativesDeel, Gusto
no first choice
Five alternativesADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Paylocity, Rippling, UKG Pro
against: BambooHR, Workday HCM
against: ADP Workforce Now, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paycom, Paycor, Paylocity, UKG Pro
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceGusto
Four alternativesBambooHR, Factorial, Rippling, Zoho People
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Paycom, Paycor, UKG Pro
Qwen 3.7 FlashHiBob, Rippling
Seven alternativesBambooHR, Deel, Gusto, Paylocity, Remote, UKG Pro, Zoho People
RipplingChanged
Three alternativesBambooHR, Deel, Paylocity
Workday HCM
Ten alternativesADP, BambooHR, Dayforce, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paylocity, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Zenefits
against: Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
Gusto
Three alternativesBambooHR, Odoo HR, Zoho People
against: Workday HCM
Dayforce, Rippling, UKG Pro
Three alternativesADP Workforce Now, Kenandy, Namely
against: BambooHR, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, SAP SuccessFactors
against: ADP, BambooHR, Gusto, Paycom, Paycor
Kimi K2BambooHR, Rippling
Three alternativesADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Paylocity
HiBob, RipplingChanged
One alternativeBambooHR
Rippling
Five alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, GoCo, Gusto, Workday HCM
Deel, Zoho People
Four alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, Rippling, TalentHR Free Plan
against: ExcelPayroll, HR.my, Payroll4Free
no first choiceagainst: ADP, Paycor, TriNet, UKG Pro
GLM 4.7 FlashXRippling
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, HiBob, Paylocity
against: Gusto, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
ADP Workforce NowChanged
One alternativeDayforce
against: BambooHR
Rippling
Six alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Deel, Gusto, Workday HCM, Zoho People
Homebase, Zoho People
Five alternativesDeel, Gusto, OrangeHRM, OrangeHRM Cloud, TalentHR
against: Paycor
no first choiceagainst: ADP, Criterion HCM, Insperity, Paychex Flex, Paycor, UKG Pro
MiniMax M2.5BambooHR
Four alternativesADP Workforce Now, HiBob, Paylocity, Rippling
RipplingChanged
Two alternativesBambooHR, Gusto
Rippling
Seven alternativesADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Paycom, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday HCM
TalentHR, Zoho People
One alternativeGusto
against: BambooHR
Rippling
Three alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, Namely
against: Workday HCM
nothing named
GPT-6 LunaRippling
Two alternativesBambooHR, HiBob
ADP Workforce NowChanged
Three alternativesRippling, UKG Ready, Workday HCM
no first choice
Nine alternativesADP, BambooHR, Dayforce, Gusto, Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, Rippling, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, Workday HCM
Zoho People
One alternativeGusto
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Rippling, UKG Pro, UKG Ready, Workday HCM
Muse Glimmer 30BBambooHR
Five alternativesADP Workforce Now, HiBob / Bob, Paycor, Paylocity, Rippling
ADP Workforce NowChanged
Three alternativesHiBob, Paycor, Sage HCM
no first choiceZoho People
Three alternativesBambooHR, Gusto, TalentHR
against: Rippling
no first choiceagainst: ADP, ADP Workforce Now, Gusto, Kronos, Paycom, Paylocity, SAP SuccessFactors, UKG Pro, UKG Ready, Workday HCM
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:33no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:27yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:28yes727 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:43yes105 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:28yes529 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:52yes56 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:29yes1827 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:54yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:15yes518 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:13yes934 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:34yes1581 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:26yes522 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:27yes213 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:41yes1119 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:29no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:16yes65 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:47no013 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:43yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:06yes529 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:42yes56 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:25yes2421 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:53yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:17no034 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:38yes918 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:52yes15239 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:01yes539 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:58yes421 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:38yes1317 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:26yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:21yes68 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:37yes1424 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:04yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:28yes539 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:36yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:03yes2431 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:06yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:53no031 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:10yes1527 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:19yes1644 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:31no045 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:33yes824 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:03yes1229 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:04yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:40yes311 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:07no018 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:40yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:11yes524 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:41yes56 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:44yes2013 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:57yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:47no030 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:35yes925 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:51yes10182 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:45yes527 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:49yes29 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:18yes1421 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:26no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:05no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:49no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:45yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:16yes530 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:35no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:26yes1828 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:13yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:13no032 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:01yes1047 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:22yes1016 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:30no023 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:36yes220 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:53yes1521 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:37yes199 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:09yes07 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:34no018 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:04yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:08yes939 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:22yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:19yes2522 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:07yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:48yes531 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:25yes2223 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:34yes18120 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:22no014 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:00yes416 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:16yes1520 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Ceridian read as Dayforce
Ceridian Dayforce read as Dayforce
Deel HR read as Deel
Deel HR Core read as Deel
HiBob HRIS read as HiBob
Oracle read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Cloud HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle HCM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Paychex read as Paychex Flex
PeopleSoft read as Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
RUN Powered by ADP read as ADP RUN
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors
Workday read as Workday HCM
Workday (Workday GO) read as Workday HCM
Workday GO read as Workday HCM
Unresolved, counted raw
ExcelPayroll
IceHrm Cloud
Kenandy (Kainexus)
MuleSoft
Odoo HR
OrangeHRM Cloud
Sage HCM
TalentHR Free Plan
UKG Pro or Dayforce
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← HR complianceLeave →