3 categories · RankedRadancy
Radancy is a talent acquisition platform for global employers, built on agentic AI · radancy.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Manatal is first at 19%.
Teamtailor is first at 39%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Phenom is first at 45%.
Why models recommend it
“Best For: Enterprise programmatic job advertising, media strategy, and global employer branding.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Another top contender, known for its robust programmatic capabilities and large network”Mistral Small · Direct question · alternative
“Need one enterprise platform: Shortlist Radancy, Phenom, Symphony Talent, or iCIMS.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“*Radancy* is called out as Best for Enterprise in SaaSworthy listings.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Enterprise suites with opaque, custom pricing—such as Radancy, Phenom, Symphony Talent, and Eightfold: Do not buy until the vendor documents every included module”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“Enterprise platforms (like Phenom or Radancy) are often too expensive, complex, and slow to deploy for mid-market teams.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
“enterprise solutions like Phenom, Beamery, and Radancy typically require $20,000–$50,000+ annual commitments”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · warning
“Be wary of mega-enterprise platforms (SmartRecruiters Enterprise, Radancy, etc.) priced at $50K+/year”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scale-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Radancy, over the 91 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 64 | 30 | View → | |
| 47 | 1 | View → | |
| 46 | 16 | View → | |
| 43 | 11 | View → | |
| 37 | 0 | View → | |
| 33 | 4 | View → | |
| 32 | 1 | View → | |
| 28 | 2 | View → | |
| 25 | 1 | View → | |
| 18 | 4 | View → |
What the models named instead of Radancy →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Radancy's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- global employers
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 85 of the 91 answers that named Radancy and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
283 of the 283 domain citations in answers naming Radancy came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 735 | 10 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 33 | 7 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 28 | 8 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| News or press | 14 | 5 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 0 | 2025-07-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2023-08-01 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2025-09-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24The buyers guide to intelligent career site technology 2 report or ebook
- 2026-09-23Beyond ai adoption building ai maturity for workday customers blog
- 2026-09-23Connecting workday and programmatic advertising for smarter hiring blog
- 2026-09-23Why candidate drop off starts before candidates ever reach workday blog
- 2026-09-18Press coverage news or press
- 2026-09-18Radancy stellt agentic ai fur die talent acquisition vor news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page radancy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.