November 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM › Customer › In-app messaging › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

In-app messaging and customer communications for enterprise buyers

Asked as “in-app messaging platform”, and as “customer communications tool for product messaging”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
24%
Contested · CometChat 11%
24Pendo11CometChat09Intercom56others

24% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+9Since October 2026: 15% → 24%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Pendo held the lead, +9 points on 15%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Pendo24%14%29accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 15% → 24%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 24%
02CometChat11%8%25accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 4% → 11%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 11%
03Intercom9%15%39accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 9% → 9%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 9%
04Braze7%6%32accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 7%
05Sendbird6%25%24criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 9% → 6%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 6%
06Stream Chat4%24%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
07Zendesk Messaging4%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
08Appcues2%12%16accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
09Userpilot2%24%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
10Microsoft Teams2%42%12criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
11Slack2%38%13criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15OneSignal0%38%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14PubNub0%25%16criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
13Twilio Conversations0%19%16accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
12Customer.io0%14%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Pendo24%
02CometChat11%
03Intercom9%
04Braze7%
05Sendbird6%
06Stream Chat4%
07Zendesk Messaging4%
08Appcues2%
09Userpilot2%
10Microsoft Teams2%
11Slack2%
12Customer.io0%
13Twilio Conversations0%
14PubNub0%
15OneSignal0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
WhatsApp Business API
100%
9 of 9 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“enterprise organizations typically avoid WhatsApp due to lack of administrative controls, compliance certifications, and data sovereignty options” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Facebook Messenger
100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Consumer-grade messaging apps like Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, and WeChat pose security concerns when used in the workplace.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Telegram
100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Telegram — Not end-to-end encrypted by default ... Infrastructure sovereignty has been questioned.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Intercom
15%
6 of 39 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“These are customer engagement platforms, not in-app chat infrastructure... extremely expensive for thousands of end users” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 898 links across 302 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 26 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · CometChat35 answers · 58 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow22 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Wire14 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · TextUs13 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Sendbird12 answers · 29 citations · 6 models
12 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Knock12 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Product Fruits11 answers · 11 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
10 answers · 10 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best in-app messaging platform”, “in-app messaging platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
Pendo pendo.io24%40912,10076119,185$3,60993
CometChat cometchat.com11%48720129,3297
Intercom intercom.com9%39233,1007,16564,348$3,304120
Braze braze.com7%54027,1006,39555,552$13,11259
Knock knock.app7%5233,10094,5857,0750
Sendbird sendbird.com6%512,9008647,136$2023
Zendesk Messaging zendesk.com
Zendesk Messaging 4%, Zendesk Sunshine Conversations 2%
6%285,365,445$16,18163
Stream Chat getstream.io4%485,40055281,47967
Appcues appcues.com2%1981,9002618,5062
CleverTap clevertap.com2%2141,0002420,153$12,75020

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best in-app messaging platform” is userpilot.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best in-app messaging platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which customer communications tool for product messaging would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade in-app messaging platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best in-app messaging platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an in-app messaging platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which in-app messaging platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Teams, Slack
One alternativeIntercom
Drift, IntercomChanged
Two alternativesMicrosoft Teams, Slack
Braze
Four alternativesCleverTap, Intercom, OneSignal, Pendo
CleverTap, Userpilotagainst: Airship, Brazeno first choiceagainst: Facebook Messenger, WeChat, WhatsApp Business API
GPT-5.4 miniPendo
Two alternativesIntercom, WalkMe
against: Appcues, Userpilot
PendoHeld
Three alternativesGainsight, Intercom, Userpilot
Braze
Three alternativesAirship, Customer.io, OneSignal
Zendesk Messaging, Zendesk Sunshine Conversationsagainst: Intercomno first choiceagainst: PubNub, Sendbird, Stream Chat
Gemini 3.5 FlashIntercom, Pendo
Four alternativesGainsight PX, Sendbird, Stream Chat, Zendesk Messaging
PendoChanged
Three alternativesBraze, Gainsight PX, Intercom
Sendbird
Nine alternativesBraze, CleverTap, CometChat, Intercom, MirrorFly, OneSignal, PubNub, Stream Chat, Twilio Conversations
Element, Matrix, Stream Chat
One alternativeCometChat
against: PubNub, Sendbird
no first choiceagainst: Drift, Intercom, PubNub, Pusher, Sendbird, Stream Chat, Zendesk Messaging
Perplexity SonarPendo
Four alternativesBraze, Intercom, Userflow, Userpilot
IntercomChanged
Three alternativesFront, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zendesk Messaging
Braze
Thirteen alternativesAirship, Appcues, CleverTap, CometChat, Customer.io, Intercom, MoEngage, Pendo, PubNub, Sendbird, Stream Chat, Twilio Conversations, Userpilot
Knockagainst: Pendo, Userpilotno first choiceagainst: Braze, OneSignal, Pendo, Stream Chat, Twilio Conversations
Grok 4.20Braze
Three alternativesCustomer.io, Intercom, Pendo
PendoChanged
Two alternativesBraze, Intercom
against: Customer.io, OpenText, Quadient, Userpilot
Braze, Pendo
Three alternativesIntercom, MoEngage, OneSignal
against: Firebase In-App Messaging, Salesforce
Appcues, Pendo
One alternativeUserpilot
against: Chameleon, CometChat, OneSignal, Produktly, PubNub, Pushwoosh, Sendbird
no first choiceagainst: Facebook Messenger, Firebase, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Snapchat, Telegram, Twilio Conversations, WeChat, WhatsApp Business API
Mistral SmallCometChat
Three alternativesIntercom, Sendbird, Twilio Conversations
FrontChanged
Three alternativesIntercom, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zendesk Messaging
CometChat
Seven alternativesIntercom, MirrorFly, PubNub, Salesforce, Sendbird, Stream Chat, Twilio Conversations
Knockagainst: Intercom, Userpilotno first choiceagainst: Facebook Messenger, Telegram, WhatsApp Business API
DeepSeek V4 FlashSendbird, Stream Chat
Three alternativesCometChat, Intercom, Twilio Conversations
PendoChanged
Two alternativesBraze, Intercom
against: Appcues
Sendbird, Stream Chat
Six alternativesAppcues, Braze, CometChat, Intercom, PubNub, Twilio Conversations
against: OneSignal, Pendo
CometChat
One alternativePubNub
against: Customer.io, Intercom, Knock, Sendbird, Stream Chat
no first choiceagainst: Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp Business API, iMessage
Llama 4 MaverickCometChat
Two alternativesProduct Fruits, Slack
IntercomChanged
Four alternativesBraze, Halo AI, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Zendesk Messaging
no first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Teams, Slack, Webex Webinars
Qwen 3.7 FlashPendo
Three alternativesAppcues, Braze, Customer.io
BrazeChanged
Two alternativesMessagepoint, Pendo
Braze
Five alternativesAirship, CleverTap, Customer.io, Iterable, OneSignal
Knock
Three alternativesMattermost, Produktly, Zoho Cliq
against: Intercom, Pendo
no first choiceagainst: Cisco Jabber, Discord, Facebook Messenger, OneSignal, Telegram, WhatsApp Business API, iMessage
Kimi K2Braze, Pendo
One alternativeIntercom
Zendesk MessagingChanged
Two alternativesPendo, Salesforce Service Cloud
against: Drift
Sendbird
Seven alternativesAbly, CometChat, PubNub, Pusher Channels, Stream Chat, TalkJS, Twilio Conversations
Mattermost, Rocket.Chat
Four alternativesCometChat, Element, Microsoft Power Apps Premium, Stream Chat
against: Knock, OneSignal, Sendbird
CometChat
Three alternativesBird, Sendbird, Stream Chat
against: Facebook Messenger, Signal, Snapchat, WeChat, WhatsApp Business API
GLM 4.7 FlashXIntercom
Seven alternativesBraze, Gainsight PX, MoEngage, Pendo, RingCentral RingEX, Salesloft, WalkMe
against: Microsoft Teams, Product Fruits, Slack
LaunchNotesChanged
Four alternativesBraze, Customer.io, Quadient Inspire, Zendesk Messaging
Intercom
Seven alternativesCometChat, Mattermost, Rocket.Chat, Salesforce Direct Messaging, Sendbird, Twilio Conversations, Zendesk Messaging
Sendbird
Two alternativesPubNub, Stream.io
against: CometChat, Twilio Conversations
no first choiceagainst: Facebook Messenger, Telegram, Viber, WhatsApp Business API, iMessage
MiniMax M2.5Sendbird
Two alternativesStream Chat, Twilio Conversations
OpenText CommunicationsChanged
Five alternativesConversica, Courier, Drift, Salesforce Service Cloud, Zendesk Messaging
no first choice
Nine alternativesAbly, Braze, CometChat, Intercom, PubNub, Salesforce, Sendbird, Stream Chat, TalkJS
CometChat, Knock
One alternativeProduct Fruits
no first choiceagainst: Facebook Messenger, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Telegram, WhatsApp Business API
GPT-6 LunaPendo
Three alternativesAppcues, Gainsight PX, Intercom
PendoHeld
One alternativeBraze
Braze, Iterable
Six alternativesAdobe Journey Optimizer, Airship, Customer.io, Insider, OneSignal, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization
TalkJS
One alternativeCometChat
against: Stream Chat
no first choiceagainst: Intercom, OneSignal
Muse Glimmer 30BPendo
Six alternativesAppcues, Braze, Customer.io, Intercom, Product Fruits, Userpilot
BrazeChanged
Four alternativesCustomer.io, OpenText Communications, Pendo, Quadient Inspire
Braze
Four alternativesCustomer.io, Intercom, Iterable, OneSignal
CometChat
One alternativePubNub
no first choiceagainst: Discord, Google Chat, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Telegram, WhatsApp Business API
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:14no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:32yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:33yes720 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:22yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:34yes1533 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:55yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:24yes2325 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:39yes54 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:41no025 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:01yes1523 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:15yes2446 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:16yes1989 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:56yes417 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:44yes1525 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:00no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:06yes55 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:00no014 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:04yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:37yes1012 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:24yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:41yes2444 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:56yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:49yes554 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:24yes2026 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:29yes2555 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:04yes527 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:26yes210 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:41yes2034 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:21yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:16yes79 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:07yes833 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:06yes108 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:40yes514 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:12yes58 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:42yes2235 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:38yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:37no034 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:18yes2347 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:52yes2365 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:00yes1436 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:38yes826 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:38yes2444 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:11yes159 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:35yes25 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:49no015 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:47yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:00yes2220 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:14yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:33yes2430 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:02yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:57yes1056 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:45yes2565 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:22yes2475 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:22yes533 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:29yes316 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:50yes2223 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:57yes1814 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:44yes611 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:35no021 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:56yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:43yes518 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:44no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:32yes2437 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:53yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:02no038 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:50yes2435 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:05yes928 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:58no030 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:31yes220 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:23yes1420 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:52yes1710 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:21yes27 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:51yes828 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:28yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:35yes1414 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:01yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:06yes2331 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:14yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:31yes1487 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:14yes1048 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:21yes1468 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:29yes1540 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:24yes421 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:56yes2336 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
GetStream (Stream) read as Stream Chat
Stream read as Stream Chat
Stream (GetStream) read as Stream Chat
Stream (GetStream.io) read as Stream Chat
Stream (formerly Chat & Activity Feeds) read as Stream Chat
Twilio read as Twilio Conversations
Twilio (Flex & Conversations) read as Twilio Conversations
Twilio (Messaging APIs) read as Twilio Conversations
WhatsApp read as WhatsApp Business API
WhatsApp (Meta) read as WhatsApp Business API
WhatsApp (including WhatsApp Business API) read as WhatsApp Business API
Zendesk read as Zendesk Messaging
Zendesk (Messaging) read as Zendesk Messaging
Zendesk (Suite) read as Zendesk Messaging
Zendesk Suite read as Zendesk Messaging
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Wickr
Apphitect
BBM Enterprise
Cisco Jabber
Cometchat for Enterprise
Doxee
Fin AI
Messagepoint
Microsoft Power Apps Premium
Microsoft Teams integrations
Nextcloud Talk
Salesforce (Messaging)
Salesforce (via MobilePush or Marketing Cloud)
Salesforce (via Salesforce In-App Messaging)
Salesforce Direct Messaging
Smart Communications (SmartCOMM)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Digital adoptionKnowledge base →