Client onboarding platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “client onboarding platform”, and as “customer implementation and onboarding project tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
51%
Clear leader
51Rocketlane24GUIDEcx06Gainsight CS20others
51% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+10Since October 2026: 41% → 51%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Rocketlane held the lead, +10 points on 41%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Rocketlane26%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Rocketlane (26%) replaces Dock (18% then, 9% now), 17 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketRocketlane32%Contested▼−15Since October 2026: 47% → 32%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseRocketlane51%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 41% → 51%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
Rocketlane26%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Rocketlane (26%) replaces Dock (18% then, 9% now), 17 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketRocketlane32%Contested▼−15Since October 2026: 47% → 32%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseRocketlane51%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 41% → 51%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Rocketlane51%16%63endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 41% → 51%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.41% → 51%
Rocketlane51%16%63endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 41% → 51%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.41% → 51%02
GUIDEcx24%13%55accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 25% → 24%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 24%
GUIDEcx24%13%55accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 25% → 24%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 24%03
Gainsight CS6%11%18accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Gainsight CS6%11%18accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%04
Totango2%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Totango2%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the nine products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Asana0%85%13criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Asana0%85%13criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12
Appcues0%55%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Appcues0%55%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Pendo0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Pendo0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
WalkMe0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
WalkMe0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
OnRamp0%24%21accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%
OnRamp0%24%21accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%09
Dock0%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Dock0%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%05
ChurnZero0%19%27accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ChurnZero0%19%27accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Planhat0%12%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Planhat0%12%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08
Moxo0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Moxo0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Rocketlane51%
Rocketlane51%02GUIDEcx24%
GUIDEcx24%03Gainsight CS6%
Gainsight CS6%04Totango2%
Totango2%05ChurnZero0%
ChurnZero0%06OnRamp0%
OnRamp0%07Planhat0%
Planhat0%08Moxo0%
Moxo0%09Dock0%
Dock0%10Pendo0%
Pendo0%11WalkMe0%
WalkMe0%12Appcues0%
Appcues0%13Asana0%
Asana0%What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Rocketlane16%
10 of 63 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Platforms with Specific Enterprise Limitations ... Rocketlane - Performance Issues: Users report slow performance” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Asana85%
11 of 13 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Tools repeatedly flagged as not built for enterprise external onboarding * Asana and Notion. Analyst round-ups specifically exclude them from client onboarding shortlists” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Appcues55%
6 of 11 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“many digital adoption platforms like WalkMe, Whatfix, or Appcues can become expensive at thousands of users” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
GUIDEcx13%
7 of 55 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Approach with caution: GuideCX if you have complex, multi-party, or global onboarding needs” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 943 links across 272 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 16 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
45 answers · 73 citations · 14 models
vendor site · GUIDEcx37 answers · 79 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Rocketlane37 answers · 59 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Software Advice23 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GetApp19 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Albato18 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Capterra16 answers · 25 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Flowla15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Capterra14 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 13 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Software Advice12 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
30 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 5 models
10 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best client onboarding platform”, “client onboarding platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocketlane rocketlane.com | 51% | 179 | 3,600 | 52 | 15,010 | $7,649 | 55 |
| GUIDEcx guidecx.com | 24% | 140 | 1,600 | 7 | 3,425 | 0 | |
| Gainsight CS gainsight.com | 6% | 73 | 59,569 | 58 | |||
| Guidde guidde.com | 4% | 18 | |||||
| Totango totango.com | 2% | 151 | 1,600 | 20 | 1,885 | ||
| FlowForma flowforma.com | 2% | 5 | |||||
| OnboardingHub onboarding-hub.com | 2% | 12 | |||||
| Apptio TechBusiness | 2% | ||||||
| ClientOn | 2% | ||||||
| Kaizan | 2% |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com). The first result for “best client onboarding platform” is typeform.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best client onboarding platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which customer implementation and onboarding project tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade client onboarding platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best client onboarding platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a client onboarding platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which client onboarding platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Apptio TechBusiness, Gainsight CSGUIDEcx, RocketlaneChangedagainst: Asana, Monday.com, NotionWalkMeFlowFormaagainst: Appcues, Chameleon, GUIDEcx, OnRamp, Pendo, Rocketlaneno first choiceagainst: Appian, Baton, GUIDEcx, Gainsight CS, Kissflow, Moxo, OnRamp, Pendo
Two alternatives
Pendo, PlanfulOne alternative
OnRampFive alternatives
GUIDEcx, Moxo, Pendo, Planhat, RocketlaneTwo alternatives
Userflow, ZiteGPT-5.4 miniRocketlaneRocketlaneHeldGUIDEcx, RocketlaneGUIDEcxagainst: WalkMeno first choiceagainst: Cloud Coach, Clustdoc, CogniSaaS, EverAfter, GUIDEcx, Process Street
Five alternatives
ChurnZero, EverAfter, GUIDEcx, Planhat, TotangoThree alternatives
Asana, Monday.com, WrikeNine alternatives
Assembly, ChurnZero, Dock, Moxo, OnRamp, Planhat, Salesforce Financial Services Cloud, Totango, VitallyOne alternative
UserpilotGemini 3.5 FlashRocketlaneRocketlaneHeldagainst: Asana, TrelloRocketlaneRocketlaneno first choiceagainst: Appcues, Appian, Arrows, Asana, Basecamp, Chameleon, ClickUp, Clustdoc, Dock, GUIDEcx, Monday.com, OnRamp, Onboard.io, Pega, Pendo, Rocketlane, Trello, Userpilot, Valuecase
Five alternatives
Dock, GUIDEcx, OnRamp, TaskRay, ValuecaseThree alternatives
GUIDEcx, Smartsheet, TaskRaySeven alternatives
Appian, Fenergo, GUIDEcx, Moxo, OnRamp, Pega, TaskRayFour alternatives
Dock, GUIDEcx, Moxo, ValuecasePerplexity SonarGUIDEcxRocketlaneChangedGUIDEcx, OnRamp, RocketlaneRocketlaneagainst: ChurnZero, GUIDEcx, Gainsight CS, Totango, WalkMe, Whatfixno first choiceagainst: Aligned, Arrows, Clustdoc, Content Snare, Dock, Dubsado, HoneyBook, Jotform, OnRamp, Process Street, SuiteDash
Five alternatives
Gainsight CS, OnRamp, Rocketlane, WalkMe, WhatfixOne alternative
GUIDEcxFive alternatives
Appian, ChurnZero, FlowForma, Nintex, TotangoGrok 4.20Rocketlaneagainst: ChurnZeroRocketlaneHeldagainst: Asana, Monday.comFenergoLifterLMSagainst: Appcues, WalkMe, WhatfixRocketlaneagainst: ChurnZero, Custify, HubSpot onboarding features, Planhat, Rocketlane, Shufti Pro, SuiteDash, Totango, Zendesk Guide, iDenfy
Two alternatives
GUIDEcx, OnRampFour alternatives
ChurnZero, Dock, GUIDEcx, Gainsight CSSix alternatives
GBG, Jumio, NICE Actimize, Onfido, Sumsub, TruliooFive alternatives
ChurnZero, GUIDEcx, Moodle, Rocketlane, TotangoFour alternatives
ChurnZero, GUIDEcx, Gainsight CS, PlanhatMistral SmallGUIDEcx, RocketlaneGUIDEcxChangedRocketlaneRocketlaneno first choiceagainst: Asana, Notion, Pendo, Rocketlane
Three alternatives
ChurnZero, OnRamp, TotangoOne alternative
RocketlaneTwo alternatives
GUIDEcx, OnRampDeepSeek V4 FlashGUIDEcxGUIDEcxHeldGUIDEcxGUIDEcxno first choiceagainst: Appcues, Asana, GUIDEcx, Process Street, Rocketlane, SuiteDash, Trello, Userpilot
Two alternatives
Rocketlane, ValuecaseOne alternative
RocketlaneTwo alternatives
Revver, RocketlaneLlama 4 MaverickRocketlaneGUIDEcx, RocketlaneChangedno first choiceRocketlaneno first choiceagainst: Asana, Notion, Pendo, Rocketlane
Four alternatives
ChurnZero, Enablix, GUIDEcx, OnRampThree alternatives
ChurnZero, Guidde, LaunchBayQwen 3.7 FlashGainsight CS, TotangoClientOn, NudgeChangedagainst: Asana, Monday.comGUIDEcx, RocketlaneRocketlaneno first choiceagainst: Asana, Basecamp, Notion, Rocketlane, Trello
Four alternatives
Monday.com, PandaDoc, Salesforce, SmartsheetTwo alternatives
Aha!, SmartsheetSeven alternatives
Dock, Enablix, Gainsight CS, Moxo, Planhat, Scope.cx, TotangoTwo alternatives
Enablix, LaunchBayKimi K2RocketlaneRocketlaneHeldagainst: PlanhatRocketlaneGUIDEcxagainst: Appcues, Userpilotno first choiceagainst: ADP, BigTime, GUIDEcx, Rocketlane, TriNet
Four alternatives
ChurnZero, GUIDEcx, Gainsight CS, OnRampOne alternative
GUIDEcxSix alternatives
ChurnZero, EverAfter, GUIDEcx, Moxo, Planhat, TotangoThree alternatives
Arrows, Rocketlane, SuiteDashGLM 4.7 FlashXGUIDEcxGainsight CSChangedRocketlaneRocketlaneagainst: Appcues, ChurnZero, Userpilotno first choiceagainst: ChurnZero, Rocketlane
Two alternatives
ChurnZero, RocketlaneThree alternatives
ChurnZero, GUIDEcx, RocketlaneFifteen alternatives
Aligned, Appcues, ChurnZero, Custify, Dock, Flowla, GUIDEcx, Pendo, Planhat, ServiceNow, Trumpet, UKG Pro, Userpilot, WalkMe, WorkdayTwo alternatives
LaunchBay, OnboardingHubMiniMax M2.5RocketlaneRocketlaneHeldagainst: DockRocketlaneGuiddeagainst: OnRampno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
ChurnZero, Flowla, GUIDEcx, Gainsight CSTwo alternatives
GUIDEcx, Gainsight CSFive alternatives
Arrows, ChurnZero, GUIDEcx, Gainsight CS, PlanhatFour alternatives
Easy LMS, Gainsight CS, Rocketlane, VitallyGPT-6 LunaRocketlaneRocketlaneHeldFenergoRocketlaneno first choiceagainst: Asana, Dubsado, HoneyBook
Two alternatives
GUIDEcx, OnRampOne alternative
GUIDEcxFive alternatives
GUIDEcx, Moxo, OnRamp, Precursive, RocketlaneOne alternative
GUIDEcxMuse Glimmer 30BRocketlaneGUIDEcxChangedGUIDEcxGuidde, Kaizan, OnboardingHubagainst: WalkMeno first choiceagainst: Asana, Monday.com, Notion, Rocketlane, WalkMe
Two alternatives
ChurnZero, GUIDEcxTwo alternatives
Gainsight CS, RocketlaneFive alternatives
ChurnZero, Gainsight CS, Planhat, Rocketlane, TotangoBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:40 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:44 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:14 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:54 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 10 | 51 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 22 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:58 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 25 | 64 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:39 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:46 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:47 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 8 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:04 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 23 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:23 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:52 | yes | 19 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 14 | 43 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 7 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:05 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:16 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 23 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 24 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:55 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 19 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:48 | yes | 20 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 20 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:20 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:39 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:50 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:18 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 10 | 411 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:13 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:22 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:30 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:41 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 23 | 64 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 25 | 92 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 19 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Gainsight read as Gainsight CS
HubSpot read as HubSpot CRM
Monday read as Monday.com
Unresolved, counted raw
ADP
Aha!
Apptio TechBusiness
ClientOn
Cloud Coach
CogniSaaS
Digital Onboarding
FIS
Fieldguide
HubSpot onboarding features
InvestGlass
Kaizan
NICE Actimize
Nudge
Onboardly
Ondato
Plaid Layer
Procore
Qontext
Salesforce (with Flow + AppExchange)
Salesforce Experience / Revenue Cloud
Salv
Scope.cx
Temenos
iDenfy
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.