OT and IoT security for small business buyers
Asked as “OT security platform”, and as “industrial and IoT device security tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
49%
Clear leader
49Microsoft Defender for IoT09Fortinet OT Security Platform07Cisco Cyber Vision36others
49% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+9Since October 2026: 40% → 49%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Microsoft Defender for IoT held the lead, +9 points on 40%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessMicrosoft Defender for IoT49%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 40% → 49%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketMicrosoft Defender for IoT38%Contested▲+17Since October 2026: 21% → 38%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
Claroty xDome36%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 35% → 36%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Claroty xDome36%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 35% → 36%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Defender for IoT49%9%54endorsed leader▲+9Since October 2026: 40% → 49%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.40% → 49%
02
Fortinet OT Security Platform9%3%34accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%
Fortinet OT Security Platform9%3%34accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%03
Cisco Cyber Vision7%8%12accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%
Cisco Cyber Vision7%8%12accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%04
Nozomi Networks Guardian7%38%39criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 7%
Nozomi Networks Guardian7%38%39criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 7%05
Armis Centrix4%41%34criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Armis Centrix4%41%34criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%06Claroty xDome4%52%48criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Claroty xDome4%52%48criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%07Palo Alto Networks OT Security2%42%19criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
Dragos Platform0%64%33criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Dragos Platform0%64%33criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10
Forescout Vistaro Platform0%41%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Forescout Vistaro Platform0%41%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Tenable OT Security0%14%29accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Tenable OT Security0%14%29accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%09AWS IoT Device Defender0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Claroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Fortinet OT Security Platform
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Armis CentrixMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Tenable OT SecurityMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityClaroty xDome vs Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDome vs Fortinet OT Security PlatformClaroty xDome vs Armis CentrixClaroty xDome vs Tenable OT SecurityClaroty xDome vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformClaroty xDome vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityNozomi Networks Guardian vs Fortinet OT Security PlatformNozomi Networks Guardian vs Armis CentrixNozomi Networks Guardian vs Tenable OT SecurityNozomi Networks Guardian vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformNozomi Networks Guardian vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityFortinet OT Security Platform vs Armis CentrixFortinet OT Security Platform vs Tenable OT SecurityFortinet OT Security Platform vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformFortinet OT Security Platform vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityArmis Centrix vs Tenable OT SecurityArmis Centrix vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformArmis Centrix vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityTenable OT Security vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformTenable OT Security vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityForescout Vistaro Platform vs Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
M01
0203040506P07
08A09
1011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Defender for IoT49%
02Fortinet OT Security Platform9%
Fortinet OT Security Platform9%03Cisco Cyber Vision7%
Cisco Cyber Vision7%04Nozomi Networks Guardian7%
Nozomi Networks Guardian7%05Armis Centrix4%
Armis Centrix4%06Claroty xDome4%
Claroty xDome4%07Palo Alto Networks OT Security2%
08Tenable OT Security0%
Tenable OT Security0%09AWS IoT Device Defender0%
10Forescout Vistaro Platform0%
Forescout Vistaro Platform0%11Dragos Platform0%
Dragos Platform0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Claroty xDome52%
25 of 48 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Small B2B (Unless Budget Allows) | Claroty | ~$150,000 | Enterprise-focused, expensive per-asset licensing” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Dragos Platform64%
21 of 33 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Quote-based pricing, often $10K+ starting, six figures for full deployment; heavy site-based licensing” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Nozomi Networks Guardian38%
15 of 39 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“it carries a high "negative feedback" rating among smaller buyers due to significant complexity and resource intensity” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Armis Centrix41%
14 of 34 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Modular enterprise subscription pricing; setup and normalization take sustained effort; expensive module packaging and add-on costs” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 906 links across 230 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 44 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Guideflow33 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
publisher (Gane)29 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G224 answers · 49 citations · 13 models
vendor site · SourceForge24 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Microsoft21 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Fortinet19 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Asimily17 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GitHub16 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
29 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ot security platform”, “ot and iot security platforms”, “ot security platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Defender for IoT 49% | 49% | 143 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | |||
| Fortinet parent site Fortinet OT Security Platform 9% | 9% | 86 | 49,500 | 2,339 | |||
| Cisco parent site Cisco Cyber Vision 7% | 7% | 19 | 165,000 | 48,352 | |||
| Nozomi Networks Vantage nozominetworks.com Nozomi Networks Guardian 7%, Nozomi Networks Vantage 0% | 7% | 127 | 20 | 0 | 3,643 | 25 | |
| Armis Centrix armis.com Armis Centrix 4%, Armis Centrix for OT/IoT Security 2% | 7% | 105 | 170 | 2 | 197,925 | $2,192 | 12 |
| Claroty xDome claroty.com | 4% | 154 | 170 | 3 | 4,901 | 14 | |
| Acreto acreto.io | 2% | 7 | 90 | 0 | 4 | ||
| Asimily asimily.com | 2% | 10 | |||||
| Azure azure.com Azure Sphere 2% | 2% | 1 | 301,000 | 47,904 | |||
| CISA Malcolm | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (fortinet.com, g2.com, trustradius.com). The first result for “best ot security platform” is fortinet.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best OT security platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which industrial and IoT device security tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top OT and IoT security platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best OT security platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a OT security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which OT and IoT security platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Asimilyno first choiceChangedno first choiceAcretono first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Acreto, Forescout Vistaro Platform, OrdrFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianOne alternative
Microsoft Defender for IoTGPT-5.4 miniFortinet OT Security PlatformArmis Centrix for OT/IoT SecurityChangedArmis Centrix, Nozomi Networks Guardianagainst: Cisco MDR with Secure technologiesFortinet OT Security Platformagainst: Tenable OT Securityno first choiceagainst: Darktrace, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT Security, Zscaler OT/IoT Segmentation
Two alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianOne alternative
Tenable One OT ExposureThree alternatives
FortiNDR, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTTwo alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianGemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Defender for IoTClaroty xDome, MemfaultChangedArmis Centrix, Claroty xDomeCISA Malcolmagainst: Dragos Platformno first choiceagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianagainst: Armis Centrix, Cisco ISE, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Qualys, Rapid7, Tenable Nessus
Three alternatives
Armis Centrix, Fortinet OT Security Architecture, Nozomi Networks GuardianFive alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Azure IoT Hub Security, Cybellum, Finite State, Nozomi Networks VantageThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for IoT, Network Ecosystem Modules, Nozomi Networks GuardianFour alternatives
Claroty xDome, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Fortinet OT Ecosystem, Microsoft Defender for IoT, TXOne NetworksPerplexity SonarMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTHeldArmis CentrixMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomino first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, Tenable OT Security
Two alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Tenable One OT SecurityOne alternative
AWS IoT Device DefenderSix alternatives
Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, Tenable One OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Tenable OT SecurityGrok 4.20Nozomi Networks Guardianagainst: Dragos Platform, Honeywell, WaterfallArmis CentrixChangedagainst: Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianArmis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoTagainst: Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDomeNozomi Networks Guardianagainst: AWS IoT Device Defender, Acreto, Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Google Cloud IoT Core, Legacy Zingbox, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Three alternatives
Cisco Cyber Vision, Claroty xDome, Fortinet OT Security PlatformThree alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Azure SphereThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityThree alternatives
Cisco Cyber Vision, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTMistral SmallMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceChangedAcreto, Microsoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks VantageCisco Cyber Vision, Microsoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: Acksys, Digi, MDEX, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, Teltonika, Unitronics
Two alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Palo Alto Networks IoT SecurityOne alternative
Tenable OT SecurityDeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, NozomiMicrosoft Defender for IoTHeldagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Three alternatives
Asimily, Awen Collective, Fortinet OT Security PlatformTwo alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, FirstPointThree alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, TXOne NetworksFive alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, GRASSMARLIN, Security Onion, Tenable OT Security, ZeekLlama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Defender for IoTMicrosoft Defender for IoTHeldMicrosoft Defender for IoTMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Defender for IoT
One alternative
Cisco Cyber VisionTwo alternatives
Palo Alto Networks OT Security, Shield-IoTThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security PlatformThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Tenable OT SecurityQwen 3.7 FlashFortinet OT Security Platformagainst: Nozomi, ZeekArmis CentrixChangedagainst: Tenable NessusMicrosoft Defender for IoTNozomi Networks Guardianagainst: Dragos Platform, Nmap, Snort, Suricatano first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Check Point Legacy IoT Products, Claroty xDome, Darktrace, Dragos Platform, Google Cloud IoT Core, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, Sectrio
Three alternatives
Claroty xDome, SecureNet, Tenable Vulnerability ManagementSix alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Azure IoT Security Center, EdgeX Foundry, Microchip CryptoAuthentication / ATSAMC Series, QEMU / Binwalk, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Armis Centrix, Tenable One OT ExposureFive alternatives
Check Point, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Glorieus, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, SCADAfenceKimi K2Industrial Defender PhoenixMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian
Three alternatives
Cisco Cyber Vision, Forcepoint, Nozomi Networks GuardianOne alternative
Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Siemens, SuricataGLM 4.7 FlashXFortinet OT Security Platformagainst: Cisco Cyber VisionMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedFortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Palo Alto Networks OT Security
One alternative
SCADAfenceFour alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Acreto, Armis Centrix, Fortinet OT Security PlatformThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks VantageFour alternatives
AlphaGuardian Networks — SiteRadar, GRASSMARLIN, Malcolm Bundle, SiemensMiniMax M2.5Cisco Cyber Vision, Microsoft Defender for IoTAzure Sphere, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityChangedNozomi Networks Guardian, runZeroagainst: Claroty xDome, Darktrace, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityCisco Cyber Visionno first choiceagainst: Ring, Verkada, Wyze
Three alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, OPSWAT MetaDefender for OT & CPS, OT Cyber DirectTwo alternatives
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall, Cisco Cyber VisionTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for IoT, Tenable OT SecurityOne alternative
Microsoft Defender for IoTGPT-6 LunaClaroty xDomeSiemens' Asset Visibility & Cybersecurity Package for SMBsChangedMicrosoft Defender for IoTMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Microsoft Defender for IoTTwo alternatives
Finite State, Microsoft Defender for IoTFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, optionally with OT Watch Complete, Nozomi Networks VantageOne alternative
CISA's open-source MalcolmMuse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityMicrosoft Defender for IoTHeldMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Darktrace, Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomino first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Two alternatives
Cisco Cyber Vision, Fortinet OT Security PlatformThree alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Acreto, Fortinet OT Security PlatformFour alternatives
Acreto, Forescout eyeInspect, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks VantageOne alternative
Fortinet OT Security PlatformBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:25 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:06 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:28 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:38 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:02 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:31 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 10 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:07 | yes | 24 | 92 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:22 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:19 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:43 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:16 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:35 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:12 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:19 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:11 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 18 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:27 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:47 | yes | 23 | 44 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 18 | 54 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 20 | 53 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 23 | 80 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:11 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:18 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 20 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:33 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:14 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 5 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:39 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:18 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:18 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:25 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:34 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:37 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 10 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:02 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 24 | 79 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:39 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:33 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:27 | yes | 22 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:14 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 16 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:15 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 19 | 37 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Armis read as Armis Centrix
Armis (Armis Centrix) read as Armis Centrix
Claroty read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (Claroty xDome) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (Platform & xDome) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome / CTD) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome or CTD) read as Claroty xDome
Dragos read as Dragos Platform
Forescout read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Fortinet read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiGate + OT Security Subscription) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Microsoft read as Microsoft Defender for IoT
Nozomi Networks read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Enterprise) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Essentials/SMB Edition) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Guardian or Scout) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Nozomi Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto (full suite) read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks (OT security module) read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security (Prisma or Industrial OT) read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Tenable read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable OT (formerly Indegy) read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.One OT Exposure read as Tenable One OT Exposure
Tenable.ot read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.ot (formerly OT Inspector) read as Tenable OT Security
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS IoT Greengrass
AlphaGuardian Networks — SiteRadar
Armis Centrix for OT/IoT Security
Awen Collective
Azure IoT Hub Security
Azure IoT Security Center
CISA Free Training & Tools
CISA's open-source Malcolm
Check Point Legacy IoT Products
Cisco MDR with Secure technologies
Claroty xDome Essential
Cybellum
Dragos Platform, optionally with OT Watch Complete
EasyNAC
EdgeX Foundry
Fortinet OT Ecosystem
Fortinet OT Security Architecture
Glorieus
Honeywell Forge Cybersecurity
Industrial Defender Phoenix
Legacy Zingbox (now part of Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security)
MITRE Caldera for OT
Malcolm Bundle
Memfault
Microchip CryptoAuthentication / ATSAMC Series
Network Ecosystem Modules (Palo Alto Networks / Fortinet)
OPSWAT MetaDefender for OT & CPS
OT Cyber Direct
QEMU / Binwalk
Ring (Amazon)
Rockwell Automation's PTC/ Kepware
STSAFE-A11A
SecureNet
Siemens' Asset Visibility & Cybersecurity Package for SMBs
Verkada
Waterfall
Wyze
Zscaler OT/IoT Segmentation
snap7 protocol library
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.