Tenable OT Security is an OT and IoT security product from Tenable that extends IT vulnerability management to operational technology environments · tenable.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Defender for IoT is first at 49%.
Microsoft Defender for IoT is first at 38%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Claroty xDome is first at 36%.
“I'd suggest starting with Microsoft Defender for IoT or Tenable OT Security”MiniMax M2.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Often a simpler choice if your priority is vulnerability/asset visibility, though the available review data suggests it's not always the cheapest option.”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“If you already use Tenable for IT vulnerability management, this integrates seamlessly and can be cost-effective as an add-on.”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“Choose Tenable if your primary goal is finding missing software patches/vulnerabilities across your enterprise.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Users report Tenable OT Security pricing can be "higher than expected for smaller plants," making it less ideal for truly limited budgets.”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Limited features in some advanced reporting areas, can struggle with deep OT protocol analysis compared to pure-play OT vendors.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Tenable OT Security, over the 78 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | 24 | Compare → | |
| 60 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 59 | 8 | View → | |
| 55 | 20 | Compare → | |
| 45 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 43 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 33 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 30 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 13 | 0 | View → | |
| 10 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of Tenable OT Security →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Tenable OT Security's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 69 of the 78 answers that named Tenable OT Security and are not a share of its labels.
222 of the 242 domain citations in answers naming Tenable OT Security came from a third party's page. Twenty were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |