The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Defender for IoT is first at 49%.
Microsoft Defender for IoT is first at 38%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Claroty xDome is first at 36%.
“OT appliances start at $2,200-$4,000 with bundles scaling to $7,000-$10,000, making this a more affordable entry point than enterprise solutions.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“converged solutions from vendors like Microsoft, Palo Alto, or Claroty are increasingly preferred”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“The Premium Choice: Palo Alto Networks ... The Trade-off: It is generally more expensive and has a steeper learning curve than Fortinet.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · alternative
“Device security with cloud-native elastic scaling and threat intelligence sharing”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“consistently highlight expensive pricing (often the top con...), complex setup/configuration, and a steeper learning curve for OT teams”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“Complex setup, steep learning curve, high cost, requires specialized expertise. May be overkill for small operations.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Also noted as a "criticized challenger" with limited positive feedback in recent rankings”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“often simpler for mid-market but less "OT-native" than the top three”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Palo Alto Networks OT Security, over the 68 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | 23 | Compare → | |
| 53 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 53 | 9 | View → | |
| 52 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 48 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 44 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 34 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 33 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 14 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Palo Alto Networks OT Security →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Palo Alto Networks OT Security's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 64 of the 68 answers that named Palo Alto Networks OT Security and are not a share of its labels.
164 of the 208 domain citations in answers naming Palo Alto Networks OT Security came from a third party's page. Sixteen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |