OT and IoT security
Asked as “OT security platform”, and as “industrial and IoT device security tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
38%
Contested · Claroty xDome 20%
38Microsoft Defender for IoT20Claroty xDome08Nozomi Networks Guardian34others
38% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+17Since October 2026: 21% → 38%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Microsoft Defender for IoT held the lead, +17 points on 21%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessMicrosoft Defender for IoT49%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 40% → 49%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Defender for IoT38%Contested▲+17Since October 2026: 21% → 38%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageEnterprise
Claroty xDome36%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 35% → 36%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Claroty xDome36%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 35% → 36%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Defender for IoT38%8%49endorsed leader▲+17Since October 2026: 21% → 38%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.21% → 38%
02Claroty xDome20%25%61accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 19% → 20%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 20%
Claroty xDome20%25%61accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 19% → 20%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 20%03
Nozomi Networks Guardian8%24%51accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 8%
Nozomi Networks Guardian8%24%51accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 10% → 8%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 8%04
Fortinet OT Security Platform6%14%28accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%
Fortinet OT Security Platform6%14%28accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 6%05
Armis Centrix2%14%37accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Armis Centrix2%14%37accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%06
Tenable OT Security2%7%27accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Tenable OT Security2%7%27accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%07
Forescout Vistaro Platform2%6%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Forescout Vistaro Platform2%6%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08Palo Alto Networks OT Security2%17%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Dragos Platform0%39%44criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Dragos Platform0%39%44criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
Darktrace0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Darktrace0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09AWS IoT Device Defender0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Armis CentrixMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Tenable OT SecurityMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityClaroty xDome vs Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDome vs Fortinet OT Security PlatformClaroty xDome vs Armis CentrixClaroty xDome vs Tenable OT SecurityClaroty xDome vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformClaroty xDome vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityNozomi Networks Guardian vs Fortinet OT Security PlatformNozomi Networks Guardian vs Armis CentrixNozomi Networks Guardian vs Tenable OT SecurityNozomi Networks Guardian vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformNozomi Networks Guardian vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityFortinet OT Security Platform vs Armis CentrixFortinet OT Security Platform vs Tenable OT SecurityFortinet OT Security Platform vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformFortinet OT Security Platform vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityArmis Centrix vs Tenable OT SecurityArmis Centrix vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformArmis Centrix vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityTenable OT Security vs Forescout Vistaro PlatformTenable OT Security vs Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityForescout Vistaro Platform vs Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
M01
020304050607P08
A09
1011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Microsoft Defender for IoT38%
02Claroty xDome20%
Claroty xDome20%03Nozomi Networks Guardian8%
Nozomi Networks Guardian8%04Fortinet OT Security Platform6%
Fortinet OT Security Platform6%05Armis Centrix2%
Armis Centrix2%06Tenable OT Security2%
Tenable OT Security2%07Forescout Vistaro Platform2%
Forescout Vistaro Platform2%08Palo Alto Networks OT Security2%
09AWS IoT Device Defender0%
10Dragos Platform0%
Dragos Platform0%11Darktrace0%
Darktrace0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Dragos Platform39%
17 of 44 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“or Dragos (strong in detection/response but services-heavy) unless you can start with their entry-level or managed service tiers” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Claroty xDome25%
15 of 61 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid premium OT-native leaders like Claroty (excellent for visibility/remote access but complex/expensive)” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Nozomi Networks Guardian24%
12 of 51 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid premium OT-native leaders like Claroty ... or Nozomi (great passive sensors)” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Armis Centrix14%
5 of 37 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid the premium OT-native suites – Claroty, Nozomi, Dragos, Armis – for a tight budget” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 890 links across 231 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 44 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Guideflow28 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks24 answers · 28 citations · 12 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GitHub22 answers · 42 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Fortinet22 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SourceForge21 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Microsoft16 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G214 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ot security platform”, “ot and iot security platforms”, “ot security platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Defender for IoT 38% | 38% | 143 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Claroty xDome claroty.com | 20% | 154 | 170 | 3 | 4,901 | 14 | ||
| Nozomi Networks Vantage nozominetworks.com Nozomi Networks Guardian 8%, Nozomi Networks Vantage 2% | 10% | 127 | 20 | 0 | 3,643 | 25 | ||
| Fortinet parent site Fortinet OT Security Platform 6% | 6% | 86 | 49,500 | 2,339 | ||||
| Suricata | 4% | 12,100 | 390 | |||||
| Armis Centrix armis.com | 2% | 105 | 170 | 2 | 197,925 | $2,192 | 12 | |
| Tenable parent site Tenable OT Security 2% | 2% | 69 | 27,100 | 1,194 | ||||
| Forescout Vistaro Platform forescout.com | 2% | 56 | 0 | 5,690 | 41 | 2 | ||
| Palo Alto Networks parent site Palo Alto Networks OT Security 2% | 2% | 64 | 40,500 | 1,088 | ||||
| Asimily asimily.com | 2% | 10 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (fortinet.com, g2.com, networkintelligence.ai, paloaltonetworks.com). The first result for “best ot security platform” is fortinet.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best OT security platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which industrial and IoT device security tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top OT and IoT security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best OT security platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a OT security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which OT and IoT security platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AsimilyClaroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro PlatformChangedNozomi Networks GuardianFortinet OT Security Platform, Palo Alto Networks OT Securityagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Delta ASDA-Soft, Delta GENESIS64, Samsung SmartThings
Three alternatives
Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, OrdrOne alternative
CISA MalcolmGPT-5.4 miniClaroty xDomeNozomi Networks GuardianChangedArmis Centrix, Claroty xDomeFortinet OT Security Platformagainst: Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Apache IoTDB, Meari IoT Cloud Platform OpenAPI Service, OpenCTI Platform, Splunk, Versa Concerto SD-WAN orchestration
Three alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDomeThree alternatives
AWS, Cisco, Forescout Vistaro PlatformTwo alternatives
Seceon aiSecOT360, Tenable OT SecurityGemini 3.5 FlashClaroty xDomeClaroty xDomeHeldClaroty xDome, Dragos PlatformCISA Malcolmagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei, Hytera, Kaspersky, ZTE
Four alternatives
Armis Centrix, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis Centrix™, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Vantage™Five alternatives
Armis Centrix, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecuritySix alternatives
Cisco Cyber Vision, Elisity, FortiGate, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, runZeroPerplexity SonarMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTHeldClaroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Pulse IoT Security Platform
Three alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityFour alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianTen alternatives
Armis Centrix, Asimily, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, TXOne Networks, Tenable One OT ExposureTwo alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Tenable OT SecurityGrok 4.20Claroty xDomeagainst: Check Point, Cisco, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Honeywell, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, SCADAfenceClaroty xDomeHeldagainst: Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: AWS IoT Device Defender, Cisco IoT, CrowdStrike's XIoT offerings, Darktrace, Forcepoint, Fortinet OT extensions, Google Cloud IoT Core, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Two alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTFive alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianFive alternatives
Endian, Forescout eyeInspect, Tenable OT Security, Wireshark, ZeekMistral SmallClaroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoTMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Three alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, FirstPoint, FortiNACDeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Dragos PlatformClaroty xDomeChangedClaroty xDome, Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Nozomi Vantageno first choiceagainst: Darktrace, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Securonix, Suricata, Symantec, Zeek
Two alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianSeven alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Armis Centrix, Azure Defender for IoT, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityThree alternatives
Security Onion, Tenable OT Security, ZeekLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Defender for IoT
Three alternatives
Claroty xDome, FirstPoint, Nozomi Networks GuardianQwen 3.7 FlashClaroty xDomeagainst: Dragos PlatformArmis CentrixChangedDragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianSnort, Suricata, Tenable Vulnerability Managementagainst: Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, Tenable OT Security, Trellix
Three alternatives
Armis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Tenable OT SecurityFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, ExtraHop, Tenable OT SecurityFour alternatives
Industrial Shield, Nmap, Qualys VMDR, WiresharkKimi K2Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardianagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedagainst: Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceMalcolm, Suricata, Zeekagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Tenable OT Securityno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Bently Nevada, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Emerson, Honeywell, Integrity Technology Group, JTEKT, Motorola, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Omron, Phoenix Contact, Siemens, Yokogawa
Two alternatives
OTORIO, SecuPiThree alternatives
Asimily, Claroty xDome, OrdrThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender for IoT, OneAlert, WiresharkGLM 4.7 FlashXFortinet OT Security PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedClaroty xDome, Dragos PlatformSiemens x Awen Collectiveagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: CISA Malcolm
Two alternatives
Claroty xDome, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityThree alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Cisco Secure Equipment Access, Fortinet FortiNACSeven alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Armis Centrix, Azure Defender for IoT, Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT SecurityFive alternatives
AlphaGuardian Networks, Fortinet FortiGate Rugged NGFW, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Suricata, ZeekMiniMax M2.5Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks VantageMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedagainst: Nozomi Networks VantageDragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoT, Tenable OT Securityno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Palo Alto Networks Zero Trust OT SecurityTwo alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Armis CentrixEight alternatives
Claroty xDome, Fortinet FortiGate OT, Honeywell SecureOT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT, Radiflow, Rockwell Automation SecureOT, TXOne NetworksOne alternative
Claroty xDome EssentialGPT-6 LunaClaroty xDomeagainst: Dragos PlatformNozomi Networks GuardianChangedDragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: Arc, Claroty Secure Access, Nozomi Guardian or CMC before 26.4.0
One alternative
Nozomi VantageOne alternative
Microsoft Defender for IoTSeven alternatives
Armis Centrix, Cisco Cyber Vision, Claroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks OT Security, TXOne NetworksMuse Glimmer 30BNozomi Networks Guardianagainst: Armis Centrix, Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedClaroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Darktrace, Dragos Platform, Nozomino first choiceagainst: Armatura One, Monta, Moscollector, Rockwell Automation, Schneider Electric, Siemens
Four alternatives
Claroty xDome, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro PlatformSeven alternatives
ELK, Forescout Vistaro Platform, GUARDIAN, Scada-LTS, Security Onion, Snort, SuricataBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:00 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:27 | yes | 22 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:53 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:26 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:47 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:01 | yes | 24 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:42 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 20 | 74 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:08 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:26 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:57 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:23 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:05 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:36 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 10 | 88 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:15 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:24 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 25 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:15 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 25 | 149 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:24 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:04 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:04 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:13 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:49 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:57 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:05 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:36 | yes | 23 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:30 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:39 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:40 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:55 | yes | 4 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:09 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:34 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:14 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:03 | yes | 24 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:38 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:10 | yes | 24 | 98 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 25 | 75 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:20 | yes | 23 | 86 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:10 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 4 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:45 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Armis read as Armis Centrix
Armis (Armis Centrix) read as Armis Centrix
Armis (Now owned by ServiceNow) read as Armis Centrix
Armis (ServiceNow) read as Armis Centrix
Claroty read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (CTD / xDome) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (Claroty xDome) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (Medigate/CTD) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty Platform read as Claroty xDome
Dragos read as Dragos Platform
Forescout read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Forescout (Vistaro) read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Fortinet read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiGate, FortiOS OT View) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiOS / OT Security) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiOT / OT Security Platform) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Nozomi Networks read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Guardian / Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Guardian) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks Platform read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks (IoT Security / OT offerings) read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks (IoT/OT security + Cortex XSIAM) read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks (OT/IoT offerings) read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT Security read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security read as Palo Alto Networks OT Security
Tenable read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable (One OT Exposure) read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable (Tenable.ot) read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable (tenable.ot) read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable OT (formerly Indegy) read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.ot read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.ot (formerly Indegy) read as Tenable OT Security
Unresolved, counted raw
AlphaGuardian Networks (Site Radar)
Armatura One
Armis Centrix™
Atonomi
Bently Nevada
Bitdefender BOX
CISA's ICS Network Protocol Parsers
Cisco IoT
Cisco Secure Equipment Access
Claroty Secure Access
Claroty xDome Essential
CrowdStrike's XIoT offerings
Defender for IoT
Delta ASDA-Soft
Delta GENESIS64
Emerson
Endian
Fortinet FortiGate OT
Fortinet FortiGate Rugged NGFW
Fortinet OT extensions
GRFICSv3
GUARDIAN
Google IoT Core Security
Honeywell SecureOT
Hytera
Industrial Shield
Integrity Technology Group
JTEKT
Mbed OS
Meari IoT Cloud Platform OpenAPI Service
Monta
Moscollector
Motorola
Nozomi Guardian or CMC before 26.4.0
Nozomi Networks Vantage™
OTForge
Omron
OneAlert
OpenCTI Platform
OpenPLC
Palo Alto Networks OT
Palo Alto Networks Zero Trust OT Security
Phoenix Contact
Phosphorus
Pulse IoT Security Platform
Rhebo
Rockwell Automation SecureOT
Samsung SmartThings
Scada-LTS
Seceon aiSecOT360
Seceon's Open Threat Management (OTM) platform
Sectigo IoT Security Platform
Shieldworkz
Siemens SIBERprotect
Siemens x Awen Collective
Snap7
Versa Concerto SD-WAN orchestration
Xage Security
Yokogawa
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.