Third-party risk management
Asked as “third-party risk management platform”, and as “vendor risk assessment tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
44%
Clear leader
44UpGuard06SmartSuite04Fair TPRM46others
44% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−11Since October 2026: 55% → 44%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.UpGuard held the lead, −11 points on 55%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
UpGuard38%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 39% → 38%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketUpGuard44%Clear leader▼−11Since October 2026: 55% → 44%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageEnterprise
ProcessUnity25%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 19% → 25%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
UpGuard38%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 39% → 38%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketUpGuard44%Clear leader▼−11Since October 2026: 55% → 44%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageEnterpriseProcessUnity25%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 19% → 25%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01UpGuard44%17%59endorsed leader▼−11Since October 2026: 55% → 44%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.55% → 44%
UpGuard44%17%59endorsed leader▼−11Since October 2026: 55% → 44%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.55% → 44%02
Prevalent4%21%33accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Prevalent4%21%33accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%03
Venminder4%11%19accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Venminder4%11%19accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%04
Whistic2%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Whistic2%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%05ProcessUnity2%32%38criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
ProcessUnity2%32%38criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%06
Bitsight2%31%35criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Bitsight2%31%35criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the nine products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
Archer0%59%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Archer0%59%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management0%53%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management0%53%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%45%51criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%45%51criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
MetricStream0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
MetricStream0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
SecurityScorecard0%24%33accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SecurityScorecard0%24%33accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Drata0%21%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Drata0%21%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%07
Vanta TPRM0%12%33accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 12% → 0%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.12% → 0%
Vanta TPRM0%12%33accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 12% → 0%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.12% → 0%11
LogicGate0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
LogicGate0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08
Panorays0%0%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Panorays0%0%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01UpGuard44%
UpGuard44%02Prevalent4%
Prevalent4%03Venminder4%
Venminder4%04Whistic2%
Whistic2%05ProcessUnity2%
ProcessUnity2%06Bitsight2%
Bitsight2%07Vanta TPRM0%
Vanta TPRM0%08Panorays0%
Panorays0%09SecurityScorecard0%
SecurityScorecard0%10Drata0%
Drata0%11LogicGate0%
LogicGate0%12MetricStream0%
MetricStream0%13ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management0%
ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management0%14OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management0%15Archer0%
Archer0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management45%
23 of 51 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“avoid enterprise-grade governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) suites (like OneTrust or ProcessUnity) which typically require minimum contracts of $15,000–$50,000+” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
UpGuard17%
10 of 59 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Generally considered expensive, especially for smaller organizations <br>• Limited functionality and reporting depth <br>• False positives in risk scores” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
ProcessUnity32%
12 of 38 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“avoid enterprise-grade governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) suites (like OneTrust or ProcessUnity)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Bitsight31%
11 of 35 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“BitSight / SecurityScorecard – Enterprise-grade, but minimum spends typically start around $20k–$30k/year.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 860 links across 216 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 11 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · UpGuard36 answers · 71 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Risk Ledger23 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Riskonnect19 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · RiskXchange18 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sprinto15 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Bitsight15 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Mitratech15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Vanta13 answers · 18 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
19 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UpGuard upguard.com | 44% | 186 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 | 25 | 3 | |
| SmartSuite smartsuite.com | 6% | 13 | 19,550 | 0 | ||||
| Prevalent mitratech.com | 4% | 96 | 74,000 | 4,082 | 46,305 | $10,768 | 106 | |
| Venminder venminder.com | 4% | 38 | 1,900 | 14 | 4,956 | 4 | ||
| Vendorapp vendorapp.co | 4% | 9 | ||||||
| Fair TPRM fairtprm.com | 4% | 6 | ||||||
| Whistic whistic.com | 2% | 37 | 49,500 | 14 | 15,430 | 16 | ||
| ProcessUnity processunity.com | 2% | 109 | 880 | 19 | 2,672 | 17 | 2 | |
| Centraleyes centraleyes.com | 2% | 42 | ||||||
| Bitsight bitsight.com | 2% | 160 | 4,400 | 146 | 126,245 | $60 | 31 | 4 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bitsight.com, gartner.com, riskledger.com, riskonnect.com, upguard.com). The first result for “best third-party risk management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vendor risk assessment tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top third-party risk management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a third-party risk management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which third-party risk management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5StandardFusionUpGuardChangedno first choiceSmartSuite, Strac Complyno first choiceagainst: Hyperproof, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuard, Vanta TPRM
Four alternatives
LogicGate, Onspring, Panorays, UpGuardThree alternatives
Panorays, Vanta TPRM, VenminderSeven alternatives
Bitsight, Drata, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
6clicks, ISMS.onlineGPT-5.4 miniUpGuardPrevalentChangedProcessUnityCreditsafeagainst: Secureframeno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, Secureframe, Vanta TPRMFive alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, RiskRecon, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardNine alternatives
Archer, Bitsight, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, VenminderOne alternative
Vanta TPRMGemini 3.5 FlashUpGuardagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardHeldagainst: Archer, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementno first choiceUpGuardagainst: Archer, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard
Five alternatives
Drata, Panorays, Prevalent, Vanta TPRM, WhisticFour alternatives
Drata, Panorays, Vanta TPRM, WhisticEight alternatives
Bitsight, Diligent One, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuard, VenminderEight alternatives
Airtable, Cynomi, Drata, Eramba, Notion, Risk Ledger, Vanta TPRM, WhisticPerplexity SonarUpGuardagainst: Aravo, Riskonnect, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardHeldOneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementagainst: Drata, Vanta TPRMUpGuardno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, Drata, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuard, Vanta TPRM
Six alternatives
Bitsight, LogicGate, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMFour alternatives
Panorays, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, Vanta TPRMSeven alternatives
Aravo, Bitsight, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Drata, Vanta TPRMGrok 4.20UpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementUpGuardHeldagainst: Bitsight, SecurityScorecardno first choiceagainst: BitsightFair TPRM, LT-VRMagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalentno first choiceagainst: Aravo, Archer, Graphite Connect, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, Risk 365, Riskpro India's Third Party Risk Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Three alternatives
Aravo, Diligent One, ProcessUnityFour alternatives
Centraleyes, ProcessUnity, Sprinto, Vanta TPRMFive alternatives
Aravo, Diligent One, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow TPRMFour alternatives
Bitsight, SecurityScorecard, ThirdProof.ai, Vanta TPRMMistral SmallBitsight, UpGuardCentraleyes, Cyber SierraChangedServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementSmartSuite, UpGuardno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuard, Venminder
Three alternatives
Drata, Panorays, Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
UpGuard, VendorLensThree alternatives
Centraleyes, Panorays, UpGuardTwo alternatives
RiskXchange, Vanta TPRMDeepSeek V4 FlashUpGuard, VenminderSprintoChangedagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnityOneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityVendorappagainst: Bitsight, Drata, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, Black Kite, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Riskpro India, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard
Three alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, PrevalentFour alternatives
Centraleyes, Panorays, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMNine alternatives
Archer, Bitsight, Panorays, Prevalent, Risk Ledger, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow TPRM, UpGuard, Viso TrustTwo alternatives
SBS Vendor Management Database, UpGuardLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceRiskXchangeno first choiceagainst: Archer, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, UpGuard, Venminder
Two alternatives
SmartSuite, UpGuardQwen 3.7 FlashUpGuardagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementVendorLensChangedagainst: MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementno first choiceConveyoragainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityLogicGate Real-Time Riskagainst: IBM OpenPages, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow Archeragainst: Archer, Bitsight, LogicGate, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Onspring, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
Three alternatives
LogicGate RealRisk, SecurityScorecard, SureCloudTwo alternatives
Centraleyes, UpGuardSix alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuardThree alternatives
UpGuard, Vendorapp, WhisticFour alternatives
Drata, Prevalent, Secureframe, Vanta TPRMKimi K2UpGuardagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityUpGuardHeldagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityProcessUnityThirdProof, UpGuardagainst: Archer, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalentno first choiceagainst: Archer, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Managementnothing named
Three alternatives
Panorays, Vanta TPRM, VenminderTwo alternatives
Sprinto, Vanta TPRMSix alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, VenminderFour alternatives
Drata, RiskXchange, Spreadsheets, Vanta TPRMFour alternatives
Complies.ai, Hyperproof, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMGLM 4.7 FlashXProcessUnity Vendor Risk Management, UpGuardUpGuardChangedPanoraysFair TPRMagainst: RiskXchangeno first choiceagainst: ProcessUnity, UpGuard
Three alternatives
LogicGate Risk Cloud, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Risk LedgerOne alternative
OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementFive alternatives
LogicGate, MetricStream, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, Vanta TPRMFour alternatives
MLab TPRM, Riskpro India, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardMiniMax M2.5no first choiceProcessUnity, VenminderChangedno first choiceVendorappagainst: Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, UpGuard
Three alternatives
Centraleyes, SecurityScorecard, Vendor Risk DashboardTwo alternatives
ThirdProof, UpGuardGPT-6 LunaWhisticUpGuardChangedno first choiceClarynagainst: UpGuardno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
One alternative
Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
Vanta TPRM, WhisticTen alternatives
Archer, Bitsight, Black Kite, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuardOne alternative
WhisticMuse Glimmer 30BPrevalentUpGuardChangedno first choiceSmartSuite, UpGuardno first choiceagainst: ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management, Risk 365, UpGuard
Five alternatives
Hyperproof, LogicGate, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Scytale, SureCloudThree alternatives
Scytale, Sprinto, Vanta TPRMTwo alternatives
ComplyJet, EasyRisk.ioBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:53 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:31 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:15 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 23 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 14 | 113 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:10 | yes | 5 | 96 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:55 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:46 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:43 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:49 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:20 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:12 | yes | 16 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:10 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:27 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 13 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:07 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:16 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:52 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:18 | yes | 10 | 50 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 25 | 174 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 11 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:07 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:15 | yes | 20 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:24 | yes | 5 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:11 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:28 | yes | 24 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 3 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:25 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:32 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:56 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:30 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:21 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:37 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:35 | yes | 18 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:45 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:25 | yes | 20 | 107 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:19 | no | 0 | 75 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:15 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:23 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:07 | yes | 19 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:52 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 25 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Diligent read as Diligent One
OneTrust read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust (TPRM Module) read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust (TPRM module) read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust Third-Party Management read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
Vanta read as Vanta TPRM
Unresolved, counted raw
360factors
Aprovall
Aravo Solutions
BlackKite
Censinet
Claryn
D&B Risk Analytics
EasyRisk.io
Graphite Connect
LogicGate RealRisk
MLab TPRM
Panorama (by OneTrust) / Panorays
Process Unity
ProcessUnity Vendor Risk Management
Risk Cloud
Riskpro India's Third Party Risk Management
SBS Vendor Management Database
Zip
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.