2 categories · RankedPrevalent
Prevalent is third-party risk management software from Mitratech that automates workflows and simplifies compliance for organizations · mitratech.com ↗
Strongest at enterprise. Ranked 103 of 107 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
UpGuard is first at 38%.
UpGuard is first at 44%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
ProcessUnity is first at 25%.
Why models recommend it
“If you're starting from scratch and want the best balance of functionality and ease of adoption, I'd lean Prevalent.”GPT-5.4 mini · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Prevalent / Mitratech is the most cited pure-play.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
“For a more robust solution, consider platforms that combine questionnaire workflows with continuous monitoring... such as Mitratech Prevalent”Mistral Small · Negative question · alternative
“Best for organizations that want a specialized TPRM platform with strong workflow automation”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“heavily reliant on questionnaires, such as OneTrust, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, Venminder, and Archer”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“Avoid overkill enterprise platforms like OneTrust or Prevalent unless you grow.”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Questionnaire-focused platforms (like OneTrust, Archer, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, Venminder) are useful for assessments but may not offer continuous monitoring”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Most enterprise solutions (OneTrust, Prevalent, Archer) require custom quotes and typically start at $25,000–$75,000+/year”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Prevalent, over the 105 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 87 | 9 | View → | |
| 73 | 17 | Compare → | |
| 67 | 11 | Compare → | |
| 67 | 2 | View → | |
| 65 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 38 | 1 | View → | |
| 36 | 9 | View → | |
| 32 | 1 | View → | |
| 28 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 25 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Prevalent →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 96 of the 105 answers that named Prevalent and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
269 of the 304 domain citations in answers naming Prevalent came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 951 | 2 | 2026-07-22 | GRC | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 500 | 0 | 2022-09-15 | GRC | |
| Report or ebook | 225 | 0 | 2018-10-22 | GRC | |
| Podcast or video | 167 | 0 | 2020-08-16 | GRC | |
| Blog | 130 | 7 | 2026-09-23 | GRC | |
| Conference or event | 100 | undated | GRC | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 92 | 2 | 2026-08-25 | GRC | |
| Case study | 87 | 0 | 2020-06-25 | GRC | |
| Template or tool | 37 | 0 | 2022-02-24 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 1 | 2026-07-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Immigration case reporting better visibility with inszoom custom reports blog
- 2026-09-21International ebilling compliance blog
- 2026-09-21Mitratech mineral earns 13 g2 badges fall 2026 blog
- 2026-09-20Why matter management matters to corporate legal departments blog
- 2026-09-18Unified third party control framework grc blog
- 2026-09-17Eu ai act digital omnibus grc blog
Events in person
- March 11, 2026The Future State of the Legal IndustryNew York, United States · attended
- March 11, 2026Where Legal Leaders RiseAt the Peak, New York, United States · hosted
- March 9, 2026 to March 12, 2026Legalweek 2026Javits Center, New York, United States · exhibited
As the event pages on mitratech.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mitratech.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name GRC (66); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.