Third-party risk management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “third-party risk management platform”, and as “vendor risk assessment tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management 19%
25ProcessUnity19OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management12Prevalent44others
25% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+6Since October 2026: 19% → 25%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.ProcessUnity held the lead, +6 points on 19%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
UpGuard38%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 39% → 38%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketUpGuard44%Clear leader▼−11Since October 2026: 55% → 44%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
ProcessUnity25%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 19% → 25%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
UpGuard38%Contested▼−1Since October 2026: 39% → 38%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketUpGuard44%Clear leader▼−11Since October 2026: 55% → 44%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseProcessUnity25%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 19% → 25%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ProcessUnity25%10%50accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 19% → 25%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 25%
ProcessUnity25%10%50accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 19% → 25%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 25%02
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management19%20%56accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 19% → 19%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 19%
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management19%20%56accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 19% → 19%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 19%03
Prevalent12%11%46accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 4% → 12%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 12%
Prevalent12%11%46accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 4% → 12%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 12%04
Aravo6%6%17accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
Aravo6%6%17accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%05
Bitsight4%26%46criticized challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 13% → 4%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 4%
Bitsight4%26%46criticized challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 13% → 4%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 4%06UpGuard2%20%41accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 2%
UpGuard2%20%41accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 2%07
SecurityScorecard2%23%47accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
SecurityScorecard2%23%47accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%08
Diligent One2%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Diligent One2%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09
Riskonnect2%7%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Riskonnect2%7%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%10
Archer2%32%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Archer2%32%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
MetricStream0%27%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
MetricStream0%27%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15
Vanta TPRM0%18%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Vanta TPRM0%18%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%11
ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management0%17%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management0%17%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12
Panorays0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Panorays0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Venminder0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Venminder0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01ProcessUnity25%
ProcessUnity25%02OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management19%
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management19%03Prevalent12%
Prevalent12%04Aravo6%
Aravo6%05Bitsight4%
Bitsight4%06UpGuard2%
UpGuard2%07SecurityScorecard2%
SecurityScorecard2%08Diligent One2%
Diligent One2%09Riskonnect2%
Riskonnect2%10Archer2%
Archer2%11ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management0%
ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management0%12Panorays0%
Panorays0%13Venminder0%
Venminder0%14MetricStream0%
MetricStream0%15Vanta TPRM0%
Vanta TPRM0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management20%
11 of 56 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Verdict: Avoid if your primary need is *just* TPRM.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Bitsight26%
12 of 46 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“Cyber-risk ratings as your entire TPRM system. BitSight, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, RiskRecon, and Black Kite can provide useful outside-in signals. But don't treat a rating as a complete assessment” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
SecurityScorecard23%
11 of 47 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“BitSight, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, RiskRecon, and Black Kite can provide useful outside-in signals. But don't treat a rating as a complete assessment” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
UpGuard20%
8 of 41 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“BitSight, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, RiskRecon, and Black Kite can provide useful outside-in signals. But don't treat a rating as a complete assessment” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 911 links across 228 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 11 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Risk Ledger33 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
32 answers · 53 citations · 13 models
vendor site · UpGuard26 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Bitsight25 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mitratech23 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Vanta19 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Riskonnect19 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Aravo17 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · RiskXchange16 answers · 31 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Diligent15 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platform”, “third-party risk management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ProcessUnity processunity.com ProcessUnity 25%, ProcessUnity/CyberGRX 2% | 27% | 109 | 880 | 19 | 2,672 | 17 | 2 | |
| OneTrust onetrust.com OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management 19% | 19% | 130 | 14,800 | 624 | 54,294 company | 58 | 4 | |
| Prevalent mitratech.com | 12% | 96 | 74,000 | 4,082 | 46,305 | $10,768 | 106 | |
| RiskXchange riskxchange.co | 8% | 20 | ||||||
| Aravo aravo.com | 6% | 30 | 1,300 | 27 | 1,717 | 10 | 7 | |
| Bitsight bitsight.com | 4% | 160 | 4,400 | 146 | 126,245 | $60 | 31 | 4 |
| Diligent diligent.com Diligent One 2%, Diligent 3rdRisk 2% | 4% | 54 | 165,000 | 6,449 | 317,551 company | $287 | 120 | 8 |
| ServiceNow parent site ServiceNow TPRM 2%, ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management 2%, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management 0% | 4% | 29 | 135,000 | 13,451 | ||||
| UpGuard upguard.com | 2% | 186 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 | 25 | 3 | |
| SecurityScorecard securityscorecard.com | 2% | 133 | 2,400 | 118 | 151,385 | 9 | 7 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 7 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aravo.com, bitsight.com, diligent.com, gartner.com, riskledger.com, riskonnect.com, upguard.com). The first result for “best third-party risk management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best third-party risk management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which vendor risk assessment tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade third-party risk management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best third-party risk management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a third-party risk management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which third-party risk management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PrevalentProcessUnityChangedBitsightProcessUnity, RiskXchangeagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Archer, MetricStream, Riskonnect, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Archer, OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementSeven alternatives
Archer, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, RiskonnectOne alternative
PrevalentGPT-5.4 miniProcessUnityProcessUnity Third-Party Risk ManagementChangedProcessUnityProcessUnityno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuardThree alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ServiceNow Vendor Risk ManagementSix alternatives
Aravo, Archer, MetricStream, NAVEX, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SAI360One alternative
OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementGemini 3.5 FlashOneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityServiceNow Vendor Risk ManagementChangedProcessUnityProcessUnityagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow Vendor Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, RiskRecon, SecurityScorecard
Six alternatives
Aravo, Bitsight, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management, Vanta TPRM, WhisticSix alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, VenminderSeven alternatives
Aravo, Bitsight, Diligent One, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Vendor Risk ManagementFour alternatives
Panorays, SAFE Security, UpGuard, VenminderPerplexity SonarOneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementProcessUnityChangedagainst: Vanta TPRMAravo, ProcessUnityArcheragainst: Aravo, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnityno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, Drata, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard, Vanta TPRM
Three alternatives
Aravo, ProcessUnity, Vanta TPRMFive alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardNine alternatives
Bitsight, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, Risk Ledger, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management, UpGuardGrok 4.20Aravoagainst: SecurityScorecardBitsight, SecurityScorecardChangedMetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow TPRMOneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementagainst: Bitsight, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardOneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementagainst: Archer, LogicManager, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, Venminder
Five alternatives
Bitsight, Black Kite, ProcessUnity, RiskRecon, UpGuardFive alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, UpGuard, VenminderFive alternatives
Archer, LogicGate, NAVEX, Prevalent, ProcessUnityFour alternatives
Diligent 3rdRisk, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, ServiceNow TPRMThree alternatives
Prevalent, ProcessUnity, ServiceNow TPRMMistral SmallOneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, RiskonnectProcessUnityChangedProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Managementagainst: MetricStreamPrevalentagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
Four alternatives
Bitsight, ProcessUnity, UpGuard, Vanta TPRMFour alternatives
Bitsight, Centraleyes, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecardEight alternatives
Aravo, Black Kite Third Party Risk Intelligence Platform, ComplyScore, LogicGate, Prevalent, Riskonnect, SureCloud, UpGuardDeepSeek V4 FlashOneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityOneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementChangedProcessUnity, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Managementagainst: Bitsight, SecurityScorecardLogicManageragainst: Archer, Bitsight, Prevalent, UpGuardno first choiceagainst: Coupa, ProcessUnity, SAP Ariba, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard
Four alternatives
Bitsight, Diligent One, Prevalent, SecurityScorecardTwo alternatives
Bitsight, Diligent OneFour alternatives
Aravo, Archer, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, PrevalentOne alternative
RiskXchangeLlama 4 MaverickPrevalentagainst: UpGuardCentraleyesChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Riskonnect, Scytale, SecurityScorecardNine alternatives
Aravo, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, Prewave, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, WhisticQwen 3.7 FlashAravoProcessUnityChangedPrevalentRiskXchangeagainst: Prevalent, ProcessUnityno first choiceagainst: Archer, Coupa Risk, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Oracle Procurement Cloud Risk, SAP Ariba Risk, UpGuard, VendorPanel
Five alternatives
Integrar, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, Secureframe, Vanta TPRMFour alternatives
Bitsight, Drata, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecardFive alternatives
Aravo Systems, Diligent One, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnity, RiskCloudTwo alternatives
Acuna / Supplier Shield, LogicManagerKimi K2Diligent One, ProcessUnity/CyberGRXPrevalent, ProcessUnity with CyberGRXChangedno first choiceRiskXchangeagainst: OneTrust Third-Party Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Bitsight, Black Kite, RiskRecon, SecurityScorecard
Three alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementTen alternatives
Archer, Bitsight, Black Kite, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuard, VenminderTwo alternatives
Prevalent, ProcessUnityEight alternatives
Bitsight, Diligent One, Galvanize, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, Rescana, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow TPRMGLM 4.7 FlashXAravo, Diligent 3rdRiskagainst: MetricStream, Riskonnect, SureCloudProcessUnityChangedVanta TPRMServiceNow TPRMno first choiceagainst: Avetta, ProcessUnity
Five alternatives
Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SAFE Security, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardTwo alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, PrevalentTwelve alternatives
Hyperproof, LogicGate, MetricStream, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, Resilinc, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecard, SureCloud, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Prevalent, SmartSuiteMiniMax M2.5BitsightOneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, PrevalentChangedno first choiceUpGuardno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Diligent One, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Bitsight, SecurityScorecardThree alternatives
Diligent One, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ProcessUnityGPT-6 LunaProcessUnityProcessUnityHeldagainst: Bitsight, SecurityScorecardno first choiceSmartSuite Signatureno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, Black Kite, RiskRecon, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuard
Two alternatives
OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementOne alternative
ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementSeven alternatives
Aravo, Archer, Certa, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
ProcessUnity, WhisticMuse Glimmer 30BOneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, PrevalentOneTrust Third-Party Risk ManagementChangedno first choiceRiskXchangeagainst: Bitsight, Black Kite, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, Prevalent, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecardno first choiceagainst: Archer, Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, SecurityScorecard, ServiceNow Risk and ServiceNow vendor risk modules, UpGuard
Four alternatives
Aravo, ProcessUnity, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardSix alternatives
Bitsight, Mitratech, Prevalent, ProcessUnity with CyberGRX, Riskonnect, SecurityScorecardSeven alternatives
Bitsight, OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management, Panorays, ProcessUnity, ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management, UpGuard, VenminderThree alternatives
ThirdSentry, UpGuard, episkiBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:15 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:06 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 6 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 13 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 5 | 75 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:44 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:11 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:57 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:33 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:18 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:03 | yes | 23 | 135 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:59 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:43 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:51 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:35 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 8 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 23 | 55 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:40 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:12 | yes | 18 | 66 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:44 | yes | 17 | 51 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:53 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:35 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:39 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:12 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:33 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 25 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 23 | 65 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 18 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 24 | 97 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:33 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:06 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:30 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:00 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:46 | yes | 12 | 73 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:15 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:09 | yes | 20 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:14 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:38 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:52 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:52 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:23 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:03 | yes | 19 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:13 | yes | 23 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:27 | yes | 21 | 64 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 23 | 151 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 18 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 4 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Diligent read as Diligent One
Diligent (3rdRisk / ThirdPartyBond) read as Diligent One
Diligent (3rdRisk) read as Diligent One
Diligent (formerly HighBond) read as Diligent One
OneTrust read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust (Third-Party Risk Management) read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust (Vendor Risk Management) read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
OneTrust Third-Party Management read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
Onetrust read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Third-Party Risk Management
Vanta read as Vanta TPRM
oneTrust read as OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Acuna / Supplier Shield
Aravo Systems
Black Kite Third Party Risk Intelligence Platform
Cotocus
Coupa Risk
Integrar
Oracle Procurement Cloud Risk
Prewave
ProcessBolt
RSA Security LLC
Recorded Future Third-Party Intelligence
RiskCloud (by Korn Ferry)
SAFE Security's SAFE TPRM AI Co-Worker
SAP Ariba Risk
ServiceNow Risk and ServiceNow vendor risk modules
VendorPanel
Whistic Network
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.