Client-side protection for enterprise buyers
Asked as “client-side protection tool”, and as “tool to monitor third-party scripts on payment pages”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
16%
Contested · cside 14%
16Feroot Security14cside12Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance59others
16% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Feroot Security (16%) replaces cside (17% then, 14% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Feroot Security leads at 16%, replacing cside, which led at 17% and stands at 14% now: 2 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Microsoft Defender for Cloud19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Defender for Cloud (19%) replaces cside (14% then, 17% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
cside18%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 13% → 18%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Feroot Security16%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Feroot Security (16%) replaces cside (17% then, 14% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This page
Microsoft Defender for Cloud19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Defender for Cloud (19%) replaces cside (14% then, 17% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketcside18%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 13% → 18%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseFeroot Security16%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Feroot Security (16%) replaces cside (17% then, 14% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Feroot Security16%6%18accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 6% → 16%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 16%
Feroot Security16%6%18accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 6% → 16%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 16%02cside14%0%30accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 17% → 14%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.17% → 14%
cside14%0%30accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 17% → 14%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.17% → 14%03
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance12%9%32accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 6% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 12%
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance12%9%32accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 6% → 12%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 12%04
Reflectiz12%29%31criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 12%
Reflectiz12%29%31criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 12%05
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint10%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 8% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 10%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint10%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 8% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 10%06
Cloudflare Page Shield4%8%26accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
Cloudflare Page Shield4%8%26accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%07
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity4%26%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity4%26%23criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%08
Source Defense4%27%22criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
Source Defense4%27%22criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%09
Imperva Client-Side Protection2%12%26accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Imperva Client-Side Protection2%12%26accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%10
CrowdStrike Falcon2%30%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
CrowdStrike Falcon2%30%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
HUMAN Security0%54%13criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
HUMAN Security0%54%13criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
Feroot PaymentGuard0%0%12accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%
Feroot PaymentGuard0%0%12accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 8% → 0%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
cside vs Source Defensecside vs Feroot PaymentGuardCloudflare Page Shield vs Feroot SecurityCloudflare Page Shield vs ReflectizCloudflare Page Shield vs Source DefenseCloudflare Page Shield vs Feroot PaymentGuardFeroot Security vs ReflectizFeroot Security vs Source DefenseFeroot Security vs Feroot PaymentGuardReflectiz vs Source DefenseReflectiz vs Feroot PaymentGuardSource Defense vs Feroot PaymentGuard
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Feroot Security16%
Feroot Security16%02cside14%
cside14%03Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance12%
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance12%04Reflectiz12%
Reflectiz12%05Microsoft Defender for Endpoint10%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint10%06Cloudflare Page Shield4%
Cloudflare Page Shield4%07Jscrambler Webpage Integrity4%
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity4%08Source Defense4%
Source Defense4%09Imperva Client-Side Protection2%
Imperva Client-Side Protection2%10CrowdStrike Falcon2%
CrowdStrike Falcon2%11Feroot PaymentGuard0%
Feroot PaymentGuard0%12HUMAN Security0%
HUMAN Security0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Reflectiz29%
9 of 31 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Pure browser‑based JavaScript agents (e.g., JScrambler, SourceDefense, Reflectiz, Human Security) | Avoid as primary defense” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
HUMAN Security54%
7 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Pure browser‑based JavaScript agents (e.g., JScrambler, SourceDefense, Reflectiz, Human Security) | Avoid as primary defense” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity26%
6 of 23 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Pure browser‑based JavaScript agents (e.g., JScrambler, SourceDefense, Reflectiz, Human Security) | Avoid as primary defense” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Source Defense27%
6 of 22 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Pure browser‑based JavaScript agents (e.g., JScrambler, SourceDefense, Reflectiz, Human Security) | Avoid as primary defense” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 892 links across 249 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 94 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · cside39 answers · 84 citations · 12 models
publisher (Gane)32 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow27 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G226 answers · 53 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Akamai22 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SourceForge17 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Feroot16 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cloudflare15 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Imperva14 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cloudflare11 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Radware11 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
30 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best client-side protection tool”, “client-side protection tool”, “client-side protection tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feroot Security feroot.com Feroot Security 16%, Feroot PaymentGuard 0% | 16% | 56 | 70 | 1 | 4,806 | $62 | 7 | |
| cside cside.com cside 14%, c/side 2% | 16% | 83 | 1,900 | 0 | 3,519 | 2 | 4 | |
| Akamai parent site Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance 12%, Akamai Page Integrity Manager 2% | 14% | 59 | 27,100 | 1,614 | ||||
| Reflectiz reflectiz.com | 12% | 92 | 320 | 0 | 1,811 | 26 | ||
| Microsoft Defender parent site Microsoft Defender for Endpoint 10% | 10% | 264 | 18,100 | 3,525 | ||||
| Cloudflare parent site Cloudflare Page Shield 4%, Cloudflare One 2% | 6% | 355 | 550,000 | 10,897 | ||||
| Jscrambler Webpage Integrity jscrambler.com | 4% | 75 | 0 | 3,194 | 42 | 6 | ||
| Source Defense sourcedefense.com | 4% | 57 | 170 | 16 | 713 | 2 | ||
| Imperva imperva.com Imperva Client-Side Protection 2% | 2% | 63 | 3,600 | 184 | 417,309 company | 1 | ||
| CrowdStrike crowdstrike.com | 2% | 302 | 74,000 | 5,130 | 715,209 | $13,967 | 119 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akamai.com, cside.com, g2.com, imperva.com, startupstash.com). The first result for “best client-side protection tool” is imperva.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best client-side protection tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which tool to monitor third-party scripts on payment pages would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade client-side protection tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best client-side protection tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a client-side protection tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which client-side protection tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceOneTrustChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint P1no first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Qualys Web Application Scanning, ScriptShield/ScurityOne alternative
csideGPT-5.4 miniCrowdStrike FalconAkamai Client-Side Protection & ComplianceChangedCloudflare Page ShieldMicrosoft Defender for Endpointagainst: CrowdStrike Falconno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, SentinelOne Singularity EndpointTwo alternatives
Imperva Client-Side Protection, Report URIThree alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Coraza WAF, Webshield LibraryOne alternative
SentinelOne SingularityGemini 3.5 FlashFeroot Security, Source DefenseAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page ShieldChangedJscrambler Webpage IntegrityFeroot Security, Source Defenseno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Akamai Page Integrity Manager, Cloudflare Page Shield, Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityThree alternatives
Feroot Security, HUMAN Client-Side Defense, Source DefenseSix alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, HUMAN Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Reflectiz, Source DefenseFive alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, CrowdStrike Falcon, Island Enterprise Browser, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, csidePerplexity SonarAkamai Client-Side Protection & ComplianceAkamai Client-Side Protection & ComplianceHeldAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Imperva Client-Side Protectioncsideagainst: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Imperva Client-Side Protectionno first choiceagainst: Reflectiz
Two alternatives
Source Defense, csideTwo alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Source Defense ProtectSeven alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Fastly Client-Side Protection, Feroot PaymentGuard, HUMAN Code Defender / Page Defender, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense, csideGrok 4.20ReflectizAkamai Page Integrity Manager, ReflectizChangedCloudflare Page Shieldagainst: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Imperva Client-Side Protectioncsideagainst: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, CrowdStrike Falcon, Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Reflectiz, SentinelOne Singularity EndpointJscrambler Webpage Integrityagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Four alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, c/sideFour alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot PaymentGuard, Imperva Client-Side Protection, csideSeven alternatives
CHEQ AI Technologies, Feroot Security, HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense, csideOne alternative
Microsoft Defender for EndpointFour alternatives
Cloudflare, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Radware Client-Side Protection, csideMistral SmallAkamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Imperva Client-Side ProtectionFou Analytics, Sentry Performance MonitoringChangedcsideagainst: Reflectiz, Source Defensecsideno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Feroot Security, csideThree alternatives
Datadog Real User Monitoring, New Relic Browser, Report URIFour alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot PaymentGuard, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Microsoft Defender for EndpointDeepSeek V4 Flashc/sideReflectizChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for EndpointReflectizagainst: Jscrambler Webpage Integritynothing named
Three alternatives
Feroot PaymentGuard, Feroot Security, ReflectizEight alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense, csideTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne SingularityFour alternatives
Akamai Page Integrity Manager, Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot PaymentGuard, csideLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceMonity, Script MonitoringChangedno first choicecsideno first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security
Qwen 3.7 FlashCrowdStrikeDatadog Browser RUM & Synthetic MonitoringChangedCrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender for Endpointagainst: CrowdStrike Falconno first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Two alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Endpoints, SentinelOne Singularity EndpointThree alternatives
Catchpoint, New Relic, TealiumThree alternatives
Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, SentinelOne Singularity EndpointOne alternative
Sophos Intercept XKimi K2Feroot Security, ReflectizFeroot SecurityChangedReflectizCloudflare OneFeroot Securityagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Two alternatives
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, csideTwo alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, csideSix alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare, Feroot Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense, c/sideThree alternatives
HUMAN Client-Side Defense, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Source DefenseFour alternatives
CHEQ AI, Cloudflare Page Shield, Imperva Client-Side Protection, csideGLM 4.7 FlashXAkamai Client-Side Protection & ComplianceFeroot SecurityChangedagainst: MonityReflectiz, csidecsideno first choiceagainst: Cloudflare Page Shield, HUMAN Security, Reflectiz, Source Defence, cside Privacy Watch
Three alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Imperva Client-Side Protection, csideOne alternative
PCI OasisSeven alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare, Fastly Client‑Side Protection, Feroot PaymentGuard, FortiWeb, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Microsoft Defender for EndpointTwo alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, CloudflareMiniMax M2.5Feroot Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrityno first choiceChangedCrowdStrike FalconMicrosoft Defender for Endpointno first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Three alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, csideNine alternatives
Cloudflare Gateway, CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR, Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, SentinelOne Singularity, Zscaler Internet Access, dope.securityThree alternatives
Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Sophos Intercept XThree alternatives
Cloudflare One, Netskope, ZscalerGPT-6 LunaCloudflare Page ShieldReflectizChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Endpointagainst: SentinelOne Singularity Endpointno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Fastly Client-Side Protection, Microsoft Defender for EndpointOne alternative
csideMuse Glimmer 30BFeroot SecuritycsideChangedCrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDRcsideno first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Radware Client-Side Protection, ReflectizThree alternatives
Feroot PaymentGuard, Monity, ReflectizThree alternatives
Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity EndpointTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ReflectizBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:44 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:34 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 11 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:27 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:51 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 22 | 64 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:38 | yes | 23 | 82 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:27 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:10 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:57 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:43 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:11 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 19 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 24 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:45 | yes | 5 | 110 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:19 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:21 | yes | 12 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:57 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:56 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:04 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 18 | 75 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 20 | 60 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:23 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 14 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:25 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:40 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:14 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:49 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:28 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:31 | yes | 23 | 68 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 14 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:29 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 21 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:01 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:28 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:43 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:15 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:34 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:40 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:47 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:51 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:43 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 20 | 112 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 3 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:33 | yes | 35 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:58 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:33 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 12 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 18 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:43 | yes | 14 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:23 | yes | 25 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 18 | 163 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:19 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Akamai read as Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance
Akamai Client-Side Protection read as Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance
Akamai Client‑Side Protection read as Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance
Akamai Client‑Side Protection & Compliance read as Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance
Bitdefender GravityZone read as Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security
Cloudflare Application Security read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Client-Side Security read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Client-Side Security (Page Shield) read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Client‑Side Security (Page Shield) read as Cloudflare Page Shield
CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Protection Platform read as CrowdStrike Falcon
Fastly read as Fastly Client-Side Protection
Feroot read as Feroot PaymentGuard
Feroot (Inspector + PageGuard) read as Feroot PaymentGuard
HUMAN (formerly PerimeterX) read as HUMAN Security
HUMAN Security Client-Side Defense read as HUMAN Client-Side Defense
Human read as HUMAN Security
Imperva read as Imperva Client-Side Protection
JScrambler read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Jscrambler read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Jscrambler (Webpage Integrity) read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Radware read as Radware Client-Side Protection
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Unresolved, counted raw
Aperia – Script Monitor
CHEQ AI Technologies
Content Security
Datadog Browser RUM & Synthetic Monitoring
Fastly Client‑Side Protection
Fastly – Client‑Side Protection
Feroot – PaymentGuard
Forrester's Webassurance/Script Monitoring Solutions
Fou Analytics
HUMAN Code Defender / Client-Side Defense
HUMAN Code Defender / Page Defender
Kount (by Equifax)
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint P1
Microsoft Defender for Endpoints
Minded Security
Monity – Script Monitoring
ScriptShield/Scurity
Sentry Performance Monitoring
Sift
Signifyd
Source Defence
Source Defense Protect
Squirrel – Payment Page Script Inventory & Change Monitoring
Webshield Library
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.