Client-side protection · RankedReflectiz
Strongest at enterprise. Ranked 111 of 116 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is first at 19%.
cside is first at 18%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Feroot Security is first at 16%.
Why models recommend it
“Reflectiz ⭐ (Highest Rated: 4.9/5 on G2) ... Fastest deployment, zero code changes | Reflectiz”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, I recommend Feroot Security or Reflectiz”Kimi K2 · Direct question · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company, I'd recommend starting with Reflectiz”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Best Overall for Low Overhead & Ease of Use: Reflectiz”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Client-side monitoring, sandboxing, or behavioral detection tools (e.g., those from Reflectiz, Feroot, Human Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Source Defense) ... ineffective against sophisticated attacks”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“"such as JavaScript sandboxing agents (e.g., from vendors like JScrambler, SourceDefense/Reflectiz, Human Security)" ... 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“Reflectiz (in some implementations) ... have been criticized because: They run inside the customer's browser, which means they can be bypassed”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning
“such as those from vendors like JScrambler, SourceDefense, Reflectiz, and Human Security) are often criticized”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Reflectiz, over the 93 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 3 | View → | |
| 52 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 50 | 21 | Compare → | |
| 44 | 2 | View → | |
| 44 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 36 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 34 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 31 | 4 | View → | |
| 28 | 0 | View → | |
| 15 | 9 | View → |
What the models named instead of Reflectiz →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Reflectiz's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- Security, Privacy, Marketing, Digital and Compliance teams
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free
- Certifications
- ISO 27001
- Customers named
- Cox Communications, Leeds United, Village Roadshow, DAZN, Apexx Global, Castore, Broadway Gaming, lastminute.com
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 92 of the 93 answers that named Reflectiz and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
284 of the 382 domain citations in answers naming Reflectiz came from a third party's page. Sixty-one were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 278 | 24 | 2026-09-28 | GRC | |
| Conference or event | 28 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Case study | 27 | 4 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 25 | 4 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Comparison | 16 | 1 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-13 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2023-09-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2023-01-16 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Most secure browsers blog
- 2026-09-23Uk travel technology pci case study case study
- 2026-09-22Magento stylesmuggler cve 2026 75650 blog
- 2026-09-16Founders case study webinar case study
- 2026-09-15Owasp appsec israel 2026 conference or event
- 2026-09-14Reflectiz vs horizon3 comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page reflectiz.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.