Client-side protection · RankedFeroot Security
Feroot Security is a client-side protection product from Feroot for securing websites and automating compliance with payment and privacy regulations such as PCI and HIPAA · feroot.com ↗
Strongest at enterprise, contested with cside. Ranked 6 of 116 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is first at 19%.
cside is first at 18%. 4 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first, contested: cside has 14%.
Why models recommend it
“Cloudflare Client-Side Security (Page Shield) and Feroot Security are the best choices due to their free tiers and strong reputations.”Mistral Small · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Best for Compliance & Ease of Use: Feroot Security ... Feroot is often cited as the strongest option.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“If you want the best balance of reputation, compliance, and user satisfaction: go with Feroot Security.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“Feroot Security (4.9/5 on G2 — highest rated) | AI-powered website compliance and security”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Feroot Security (higher cost, but excellent for payment page protection)”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Feroot Security, over the 59 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 36 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 36 | 0 | View → | |
| 29 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 2 | View → | |
| 25 | 5 | View → | |
| 22 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 14 | 1 | View → | |
| 12 | 2 | View → | |
| 11 | 5 | View → |
What the models named instead of Feroot Security →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Feroot Security's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- Security teams, privacy teams, and compliance teams
- Price stated
- Contact Feroot for a custom quote tailored to your specific needs.
- Free plan or trial
- Free scan
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS
- Customers named
- Instacart, Reddit, Gusto
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 56 of the 59 answers that named Feroot Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
199 of the 243 domain citations in answers naming Feroot Security came from a third party's page. Twenty-eight were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 310 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | GRC | |
| Glossary or explainer | 132 | 0 | 2025-11-25 | SIEM, Compliance automation | |
| News or press | 51 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Comparison | 20 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 13 | 0 | 2026-04-16 | GRC | |
| Template or tool | 8 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Feroot expands dxcomply with code free consent auditing for native mobile apps news or press
- 2026-09-23The consent compliance paradox blog
- 2026-08-21Beyond the compliance snapshot why grc needs continuous evidence blog
- 2026-07-31Ivan tsarynny on cnbc ai regulation should empower defenders not limit their ability to defend news or press
- 2026-06-25Cookie consent vs gdpr compliance why network traffic matters more than banners comparison
- 2026-06-18What canadas bill c 36 means for ai powered digital experiences blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page feroot.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.